Pentagon releases UFO footage
- Thread starter Doobedoo
- Start date
A lot of military personal have given testimony about UFO disabling missiles and nukes over multiple bases in a 6 month timeframe. Many of then respectable high-ranking officers from captains, majors and even Colonels. Many of which have nothing to gain from speaking out. They are not making money from this.
Yesterday it was David Schindele who gave testimony to AARO that 10 nuclear missiles where disabled in an AARO encounter. Which goes along with retired USAF Staff Sergeant Mario Woods, who recently testified under oath to the Pentagon's UAP / UFO Program. This is two of many former nuclear officers that have testified to the AARO office in the past few months some of which apparently have official military records to go along with the event.
There are others as well like retired Air Force Capt Robert Salas, Major Brad Runyon, Colonel Fred Meiwald. All the fighter pilots who say they had closed calls and near misses with advanced UFOs which the USA Airforce acknowledge with an official policy.
Apparently there are official military documents and even an audio recording of Colonel Fred Meiwald's testimony to Captain Robert Salas which confirms that soldiers were injured during the UFO event.
Some of these officers are known to be honourable.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8diIRa7mUA0 (not the testimony from yesterday to ARRO) but gives a good indication of how genuine this appears to be. No blaming this one on balloons.
Yesterday it was David Schindele who gave testimony to AARO that 10 nuclear missiles where disabled in an AARO encounter. Which goes along with retired USAF Staff Sergeant Mario Woods, who recently testified under oath to the Pentagon's UAP / UFO Program. This is two of many former nuclear officers that have testified to the AARO office in the past few months some of which apparently have official military records to go along with the event.
There are others as well like retired Air Force Capt Robert Salas, Major Brad Runyon, Colonel Fred Meiwald. All the fighter pilots who say they had closed calls and near misses with advanced UFOs which the USA Airforce acknowledge with an official policy.
Apparently there are official military documents and even an audio recording of Colonel Fred Meiwald's testimony to Captain Robert Salas which confirms that soldiers were injured during the UFO event.
Some of these officers are known to be honourable.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8diIRa7mUA0 (not the testimony from yesterday to ARRO) but gives a good indication of how genuine this appears to be. No blaming this one on balloons.
Associate
- Joined
- 27 Jan 2022
- Posts
- 756
- Location
- UK
Interesting. Do they have an evidence to back up their claims? or that covered in their new book on sale now?
How does one disable a nuke? Big off button or more technical?
How does one disable a nuke? Big off button or more technical?
Did you skip over the video again? Most of them are not profiting from this in fact the opposite they are worried about losing money. Some of the other military officers didn’t want their names shown as they are worried about losing the military pension for breaking the rules and speaking out. They had strict orders not to talk about the event even among themselves.
Don’t you think it’s interesting that all these different high level military officers from different bases and different dates all have the exact same event to tell? We are talking about respectable honourable people with notable rank.
I haven’t got time to link everything, I can do later if you are really interested. There are at least 6 witness Affidvits, 12 official military records and the audio recording between Colonel Fred Meiwald's and Captain Robert. The official military documents say 70 military personal involved and multiple UFOs involved. The official records also mention video footage but I have not seen this.
https://ufohastings.com/storage/files/image/2010-10-11/fbi_new_mexico_1950-08-23.jpg
https://ufohastings.com/storage/files/image/2012-02-05/FE_Warren_1965_1.jpg
https://ufohastings.com/storage/fil...letype_1967-03-17_loss_of_strategic_alert.jpg
Its officially confirmed that the event did happen. All 10 nukes/missiles disabled within 10 seconds of each other. No big off button, more technical.
Last edited:
Associate
- Joined
- 27 Jan 2022
- Posts
- 756
- Location
- UK
I know all about UFOs but I've been sworn to secrecy, sorry.
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 30 Sep 2005
- Posts
- 16,717
is that you Luis Elizondo?
Reading the report from Malmstrom AFB, which is where the land based minuteman missiles are kept, the report simply states that there was a computer malfunction and 10 missiles were taken offline.
The report was dated march 1967, which was right in the middle of a program to upgrade the missiles from minuteman I to minuteman II, and and a hell of a lot of upgrade work had been done.
There’s no mention of flying saucers in the report that I saw, that related to the missiles being disabled.
The report even states that there was no known reason for the malfunction, so they basically had no idea.
I think a rational and simple explanation is that there was probably a bug, and after a reload it went away..
I imagine a load of Boeing systems engineers spent ages replicating it, and eventually fixed it….
The event was classified and all military personal sworn to secrecy. So yes the official report from 1967 that came out to the public didn't mention UFO's. UFOs are in the official classified files about what really happened at the site. For 40+ years the files where highly classified and personally where not allowed to talk about the event even between themselves. The official classified records tell a different story and clearly mention UFOs backed up by all the officers who confirm the official records. It wasnt even a one off event but happen time and time again at multiple bases over a period of time.
So you are just going to ignore the multiple UFOs observed by 70+ military personal and all the high ranking officers who testified under oath an gave witness affidavits about what happened and all the mentions about UFOs in the official reports? Backed up by radar and other sources?
So you are saying it’s a complete fluke and unrelated that the UFOs appeared multiple times as the missiles got disabled not once but time and time again over differing military bases? It was just a bug reload that went away that just happened to appear every time the the UFO appeared?
Its also a complete fluke that the time the strike team attempted to engaged the UFO all the radios died, equipment died and static hit. Just a random computer fault that hit every independent radio at the same time. Completely unrelated to the missiles fault and everything else that happened. How do you explain the radar confirmation, the F-106 interceptors, strike teams along with the surveillance teams? That seems a bit excessive for a random computer fault. Speaking of which if it was just a computer bug why did radar pick up the UFO with interceptors, strike teams and surveillance teams despatched?
You seem to be really stretching at calling this just a random bug fault.
https://ufohastings.com/storage/files/image/2010-10-11/minot_afb_1966-08-25_03.jpg
There are loads more official documents like this backed up by military officers including high ranking officers. One document said “in several instances sightings where verified by other observations from nearby control centres”.
https://ufohastings.com/storage/files/image/2010-10-11/salas_01.jpg
https://ufohastings.com/storage/files/image/2010-10-11/jamison_01.jpg
These are not the only officers reports there are more to go along with the official records.
Considering the military has said this is all backed up on radar, video and audio with both military and civilian witness's I don't see how you can deny it or pretend its just a random computer fault. Its not just the military, civilians in nearby towns where mass reporting UFOs at the same time in the same location. There is even a recording of Colonel Fred Meiwald's talking to to Captain Robert Salas about the UFO incident. I don't think your explanation is remotely rational or comers close to matching the facts of the event that we have.
Last edited:
The thing is @Pottsey all you’re really doing is posting a load of spam, then saying “omg how can you deny”
Nothing in any of those links contains any evidence at all, what people decide to come out and say now, 43 years after it apparently happened, should be taken with a boulder of salt.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and I don’t see any evidence at all, just conjecture.
I think you simply want to believe in flying saucers so much, you’ve pre-supposed that flying saucers are the default explanation based on blind faith.
Nothing in any of those links contains any evidence at all, what people decide to come out and say now, 43 years after it apparently happened, should be taken with a boulder of salt.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and I don’t see any evidence at all, just conjecture.
I think you simply want to believe in flying saucers so much, you’ve pre-supposed that flying saucers are the default explanation based on blind faith.
I do. It's all from the same tinpot website. Find a proper source and we'll talk.
Closed protocol, you need the supervisor level passwords. A quick call to Nukes'R'Us will generally sort you out.
All I am doing is posting evidence and you seem to be in a state of denial unable to accept what you are seeing that is if you even clicked the links and read them. Your the one that keeps coming up with all the nonsense explanations to try to write off what is being seen, as you have throughout this thread. The only reason you cannot see any evidence is you keep blanking it out like the conspiracy theorists who deny COVID is real.
So because you cannot accept UFOs are real you are calling official classified reports from the event that date back to 1967 spam. Official reports that match all the eye witness's both civilian and military. If it was just a few people talking 43 years after the event sure that's just conjecture. But we have the base records dating back to 1967 that confirm the events. So you are just going pretend none of classified reports happened?
Those are official military reports dating from the event stating as a matter of fact of what happened. So far you have completely failed to debunk them just like all the other evidence in this thread you have failed to debunk.
The fact is the US Airforce has had so many Fighter pilots in near miss's with UFO's that required pilots to take action they acknowledge UFO's and have created a official procedure for dealing with them.
The US Navy also acknowledges UFO's again now having an official procedure for dealing with them due to wide spread interactions.
The president of the US came forward and said in seriousness UFO are real as per the link seen in this thread multiple times.
Senators have came forward talking about the skies are not clear UFOs are real as per the link provide before
The ground based military also confirmed in official records as per my links and backed up by standing up under oath to tell Senators what happened.
Its not just the US military either others like the Brazil military have long admitted UFO's and attempted to engage them backed up by military evidence, radar and wide spread witness's. The Brazil military is open about how often they come across UFO's backed up by wide spread ground reports and military action to engage UFO's.
At some point you have to question how and why so many separate official government entities from different counties are all reporting the same thing. Why are so many military personal and civilians reporting the same thing world wide. Why is there a pattern in the reported data with reports being mostly consistent? The best you can do is "there is no evidence" despite all the evidence shown which makes you sound more and more like the COVID denying conspiracy theorists.
Those are official military records that don't change due to where they are hosted. Go do a freedom of information act you can can get the same files directly from the DOD yourself. Those officers testified officially under oath to the AARO and Senators. The website is just rehosting and reposting the official records that you can cross refence and see are real. How are those not proper sources? You can cross refence and see its all real. Plus its not all from the same website. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8diIRa7mUA0 nothing to do with tinfoil hat websites. matches the official classified records of what happened at the base.
Prove it.
Congress passed a bill around 2021 that includes the provision for calling for UFO related document disclosure along with more recently making it legal for military personal to speak out without breaking disclosure rules.
Consequently the CIA released approx 2,780 documents detailing the government findings on UFOs. Likewise, Freedoms of information request to the DOD are being completed with UFO files being declassified and provided on request as per the files I linked to before. As per the recent Congress briefing there is currently a big push in getting UFO data out there and for stigma to be removed and UFO to be investigated properly. If you really want to read the full authorization with all its legal speak.
Publications | Intelligence Committee
The UAP phenomenon has full support from both parties in both Houses of Congress.
UFOs: Fact or Fiction? | CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov)
Just some semiu random examples https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/DOC_0000015441.pdf minuets of Branch Chief meetings 1952
https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/DOC_0000015374.pdf 1955 UFO confirmed by military pilot, confirmed by ground radar, dual electronic sightings for 49mins
There is a massive wealth of declassified official military files. 2,780 aprox reports. Direct from the official CIA website. So if you don't like the UFO sites re hosting the data go take a look directly at the CIA files.
As for the missiles incident two vets testified see https://myemail.constantcontact.com...acobs.html?soid=1114176610901&aid=3JAzoRbWq30 plus you can look up how a 3rd vet David Schindele testified just yesterday.
I hope that's enough proof that the missile UFO event really happened and the official files are real.
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Sep 2012
- Posts
- 3,213
.
Last edited:
No lol.
The way you present your argument is like spam.
You give this example of 10 minuteman ICBMs being disabled by flying saucers, back in 1967, which to someone who’s studied Cold War and nuclear weapons history (me) is very interesting.
You then present a declassified document which details how an unexpected computer fault temporarily took the missiles offline, the report makes no mention of any possible cause and no mention of flying saucers.
You then, pull out all of these eyewitness reports from people, detailing vague, unverifiable things from 43 years ago, with zero evidence full of fantastic claims about flying saucers, discs, spheres etc etc - but no ******* evidence, zero - just written testimony.
To be honest, all of the reports you linked just sound like generic sci-fi stuff you’d get from a tourist book about Roswell, there isn’t really anything specific or original being said, just the same old **** we’ve all heard before.
And where did I say UFOs don’t exist?? Of course they exist, there will always be bits of crap, balloons, misidentified objects and all manner of things floating about, I just haven’t seen any evidence that it’s aliens or anything special at all.
Last edited:
This is why I think you’re in denial and blanking out information as the base commander wrote UFO multiple times in the report. It feels like you didn’t even look at the entire event just laser focused on 1 tiny bit so you can pretend the rest didn’t happen. Which is funny as the bit you laser focused on says no software bugs found but you think it’s a software bug.
Just like when you pretended Gofast was a bird or the recent Plane UFO video was Crypto related when it wasn’t. Everything points to, you don’t want to accept what you are looking at and are making up excuses to write-off what you are seeing.
If you are really interested in the history it was a lot more then more than 10 missiles that got disabled and it happened multiple times both at the same base and different bases with a UFO nearby the other event. At one time the strike teams who was hunting the UFO had all the radios go dead at the same time.
As for not evidence that’s where I disagree. There is a massive difference between 1 random person from the street giving testimony without proof compared to testimony under Oath by a Captain, confirmed by a Major, confirmed by a Colonel confirmed by a base operations manager, backed up by base reports. All done all under Oath and backed up by reports that date back to the event and backed up by other personal who where active at the base. We are not talking some random interview with a cheap newspaper looking for a story. They had to go to congress for official under Oath interviews.
I also don’t agree the reports count as just random written testimony. When the UFO was there on base investigations were done. They picked up the object on radar, they sent out fighter jets, they sent out strike teams they confirmed via nearby bases with radar, they had teams on the ground who also reported equipment being disabled.
They didn’t write those reports based on make believe. They wrote those reports based on the evidence at hand at the time. Like the radar they looked at the logs.
Don’t you see the difference between someone saying something happened 40 years ago and someone saying something happened 40 years ago backed up by everyone else who was there and backed up by the official records from that date and records based on hard data like radar?
The people who wrote these reports had the hard facts in front of them like the radar data. Yet it feels like your answer is “its just written testimony. It doesn’t count as evidence”. Well that written testimony is based on facts and data from the people on the ground at the time of the event. If a car crash investigator writes a report about a car being written off based on the data in front of him and the car being smashed up. You don't say that's just written testimony. It doesn’t count as evidence.
Perhaps you can agree on this. There was clearly a psychical unknown object flying around at the same time as the missiles got disabled. There is a lot of collaborating evidence and witness's with matching testimony and enough data to suggest this this should be investigated further and looked into in more detail officially.
This is what I am on about you don’t look at the data objectively. One of the files I pulled out said the UFO was spotted by a trained military pilot simultaneously observed by ground radar, also observed by base site, dual visual and electronic sighting simultaneously from multiple sources. The difference to before is these are trained professionals with cross referenced data so its not a mistake by one person. If the person on ground radar is seeing the same as the people on base and the pilot in the air all cross refenced by electronic systems then there really was real object and something strange going off, far more then just a random untrained tourist spotting something.
Why do you think the Governments are taking this seriously and opening up a team to look into UFO’s? Its because the amount of data pointing to something being real and something flying around is overwhelming. There gets to a point where you get so many reports that you have to go “hang on, perhaps there is something to this”
There is a difference between a handful of reports from unreliable people and no evidence. To countless 1000’s of reports from high ranking officers backed up by radar and other data and not just your own military but from other country's military reports the same as well. Something is going off and balloons, birds and crap doesn't explain it.
EDIT: Not going be posting for a while. I didn't want you think I was ignoring any reply. Looking at my timetable I am not going have any free time shortly.
Last edited:
Associate
- Joined
- 27 Jan 2022
- Posts
- 756
- Location
- UK
UFOs: Fact or Fiction? | CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov)
Unsubstantiated.
"2. Essentially, the "object" was apparently simultaneously observe by a tanker aircraft (KC 97) pilot (visiually) and ground radar (type unknown) site (electronically)."
Apparently.
The report is about the claims of 2 witnesses, no evidence, nothing recorded beyond hearsay.
Hear'Say - Wikipedia
The most likely explanation for gofast based on the data is that it’s a migratory bird of some sort, possibly a duck or a goose.
The only people who say it isn’t, are the people who are convinced that it’s a flying saucer, the government have made no other comments other than the video is genuine.
And I stand by the Mexican flying saucer video appearing on a crypto retweet account, it’s just odd. It feels like a bunch of people have made it all up to grab some clicks and make some cash, the footage isn’t exactly convincing.
No - there’s no evidence whatsoever anywhere, that a flying saucer was flying around Malmstrom AFB disabling minuteman ICBMs.
What’s basically happened, is you’ve taken one report of what looks like a computer malfunction, then you’ve conflated it with a bunch of stuff from
a website dedicated to flying saucers.
None of which can be corroborated, verified or reviewed - it’s just written witness statements, written 43 years later.
It means jack **** @Pottsey
What “data?” There is no data - that’s the problem, somebody writing a witness report isn’t data, it’s just somebody saying something.
Data is measurements, telemetry, photographs, sensor readings, satellite photos, physical evidence or something.
Associate
- Joined
- 10 Jul 2018
- Posts
- 510
- Location
- London.
Writen Testimony is evidence?