Pentagon releases UFO footage

but Earth seems to be a target for crashed Alien craft because, according to some, we have had a lot.
About 1 every 5 years are the number hinted at by David in that they find them around about 1 every 5 years on average. Though he didn't say he was talking about where extra-terrestrial space craft only none human exotic which could mean other things then extra-terrestrial.

It all comes down to numbers which we have nothing to really go on. If we go with the 200,000+ UFO reports and assume this means there are 200,000 visits. I know, this is an unrealistic number. But lets pretend everything is true and the amount of visits a year are high. Then 5 to 10 crash over a 50 year timeframe from a high umber of visits is not that unreasonable. It all depends on the ratio of crashes to visits. If they have only visited us 500 times over 50 years then yeah those 12+ crashes seem rather high. That's if aliens are even visiting which I am still not convinced about. As far as I recall David never mentioned extra-terrestrial space craft.
 
I hope this is sarcasm.. if not

So these advanced aliens with physics we can't imagine cross the galaxy and then crash when they arrive at Earth and if the stories are to be believed, keep crashing. Earth must the most jinxed planet in the universe.
As I said, peak civilisation, these aliens having nothing to do but tour the galaxy and get high, I'm just surprised their degeneracy hasn't given birth to a demon of chaos yet
 
I would imagine it would be some what deflating to travel for hundreds of years on a generation ship and then arriving at your destination (or at least you as a descendent) to find it had already been colonised because after the generation ship had left further advancement in technology had led to much faster travel.
I’d imagine it’d be a ***** sight more deflating travels hundred of years only to arrive at earth and see the shape it and it’s supoosedly most intelligent life form is in!!
 
About 1 every 5 years are the number hinted at by David in that they find them around about 1 every 5 years on average. Though he didn't say he was talking about where extra-terrestrial space craft only none human exotic which could mean other things then extra-terrestrial.

It all comes down to numbers which we have nothing to really go on. If we go with the 200,000+ UFO reports and assume this means there are 200,000 visits. I know, this is an unrealistic number. But lets pretend everything is true and the amount of visits a year are high. Then 5 to 10 crash over a 50 year timeframe from a high umber of visits is not that unreasonable. It all depends on the ratio of crashes to visits. If they have only visited us 500 times over 50 years then yeah those 12+ crashes seem rather high. That's if aliens are even visiting which I am still not convinced about. As far as I recall David never mentioned extra-terrestrial space craft.
By that logic, if I draw my own lottery ticket, eventually I will win the lottery. I mean, if I make enough of them, one day I will have created a winning one. Right?
 
but Earth seems to be a target for crashed Alien craft because, according to some, we have had a lot.
Well they get close enough, pick up radio signals and hearing a Mariah Carey high note blows a gasket in their alien minds like shattering glass.

Crash ensues.
 
By that logic, if I draw my own lottery ticket, eventually I will win the lottery. I mean, if I make enough of them, one day I will have created a winning one. Right?
Yes that sort of the point. The more an event happens the more often you expect to see the rare event linked to that main event happening.

Think of it in airplane terms. If we say 0.1% of planes crash (just a random number I picked). Then if there are 500 flights in 1 year we would expect to see less crashes then if there was 1 million flights in 1 year. Then multiple that over 50 years. It doesn't matter how low the odds of a crash are. Put enough flights in the air over a long enough period of time and you expect to see a crash at some point. Same with UFO's if they are visiting us and visiting us in high enough numbers over the past 70+ years then its not surprising that at some point over enough years one or more of then will run into a problem and crash.

Just to be clear I am not saying aliens are visiting us. I am just trying to offer and explanation of why a handful of crashes is not impossible if it turns out UFOs are real and have been year for 70+ years.
 
oh yeah aliens are idiots, can't even land a space craft. Give it here, I'll land it for you.
Real life unmanned probes are not exactly known to have a 100% success rate at unmanned landings. Sometimes they fail that's the nature of technology. Even expert veteran pilots who have countless hours flying make mistakes and crash. No known intelligent life is flawless, No known technology is flawless. When it comes to landing from space or going to space its always a risk with a possibility of a crash.
 
Last edited:
It's the DM so make of it what you will but...




WMEDnZZ.gif
Haha, someone is basically trolling at this point. Surely nobody could believe this.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: mrk
Real life unmanned probes are not exactly known to have a 100% success rate at unmanned landings. Sometimes they fail that's the nature of technology. Even expert veteran pilots who have countless hours flying make mistakes and crash. No known intelligent life is flawless, No known technology is flawless. When it comes to landing from space or going to space its always a risk with a possibility of a crash.
For somebody who claims they’re agnostic about the visitation of aliens, you’re come across as desperate to link how everything could still yet be aliens.

“It could still be aliens visiting us because their technology would be too incomprehensibly advanced for us to understand, but their technology might also be bad enough for a tree to give them issues”. :D
 
It’s also possible - and I suspect probable - that out of 200,000 sightings, that zero percent of those are actually alien sightings or crashes.
Very likely yes. I personally still think many of the UFO sighting are just classified maned or unmanned military drones or vehicles. Even David Grusch didn't say extra-terrestrial space craft despite all the people saying he did.
 
For somebody who claims they’re agnostic about the visitation of aliens, you’re come across as desperate to link how everything could still yet be aliens.

“It could still be aliens visiting us because their technology would be too incomprehensibly advanced for us to understand, but their technology might also be bad enough for a tree to give them issues”. :D
Think we just posted at the same time :) I have been very clear on my stance. As my post just before this shows, though you might not have seen it as it looks like we posted at the same time.
 
Last edited:
As an aside, I’ve always thought the chances of us being able to reverse engineer alien technology has always been incredibly small. Even ignoring being able to reproduce alien manufacturing processes, surely there’s a high chance they could use materials/elements/alloys that we don’t have access to on Earth?

I don't think we'd recognise it as technology, I think it would be so unlike anything we can imagine - the idea of reverse engineering it is perverse.

The nature of the problem; travelling hundreds or thousands of lightyears to another planet, is so vast that the physics theories you'd need to know would be so implausible and exotic, that the resulting machine or technology wouldn't be like a machine or anything we recognise at all.

It would literally be beyond human imagination,
 
Last edited:
I don't think we'd recognise it as technology, I think it would be so unlike anything we can imagine - the idea of reverse engineering it is perverse.

The nature of the problem; travelling hundreds or thousands of lightyears to another planet, is so vast that the physics theories you'd need to know would be so implausible and exotic, that the resulting machine or technology wouldn't be like a machine or anything we recognise at all.

It would literally be beyond human imagination,

 
Real life unmanned probes are not exactly known to have a 100% success rate at unmanned landings. Sometimes they fail that's the nature of technology. Even expert veteran pilots who have countless hours flying make mistakes and crash. No known intelligent life is flawless, No known technology is flawless. When it comes to landing from space or going to space its always a risk with a possibility of a crash.

These are Alien probes though with technology so advanced we can't even comprehend, there is no way those probes aren't landing safely, too much time and effort has gone into them.
If I came back to Earth in a 1000 years and cars were still crashing into each other and blaming it on cyclists who don't pay Road Tax I'd be very disappointed in technolology.

(I'm leaving that spelling mistake in).
 
These are Alien probes though with technology so advanced we can't even comprehend, there is no way those probes aren't landing safely, too much time and effort has gone into them.

It's hilarious,

I mean look at how many planes we have in the skies at any time - there's around 8000 in the air at any point in time, and we have a couple of crashes a year.

These flying saucers, considering there must be hardly any of them (because we've never seen an actual verified picture of one) must be made by British Leyland or Jaguar back in the 1990s or something - because they're falling out of the skies like flies recently.

And logically, compared to an actual, legit alien flying saucer, and Airbus A380 would be like a literal paper aeroplane, in comparison - yet not a single A380 has ever crashed ever. :cry:
 
Back
Top Bottom