Pentagon releases UFO footage

MoNkeE said:
The biggest mystery in this thread is how it’s taken until today for you to watch this Congress briefing, despite you banging on about it for WEEKS before hand, and posting innumerable long replies in this thread since it was held!
Click to expand...
You must be confusing me with someone else. I don't recall banging on about this briefing weeks before hand. In fact I don't think anyone else did either. So what are you on about? It only came out Wednesday and I was busy at work. I read the highlights on Thursday then Saturday I watched half with half on Sunday.
 
You having a laugh mate? The talk in this thread for literal weeks has been about the build up to this Congress briefing, along with ad nauseam debate of the attendees credentials and believability of their claims……
 
MoNkeE said:
You having a laugh mate? The talk in this thread for literal weeks has been about the build up to this Congress briefing, along with ad nauseam debate of the attendees credentials and believability of their claims……
Click to expand...

He's been talking about the Tic Tac videos, not this new BS.
 
MoNkeE said:
Which is part of the hearing though, isn’t it?!
Click to expand...
It was brought up in the recent hearing where it showed Screeech's duck/balloon idea is wrong. While I was talking about those videos over the past weeks I didn't know they would be in the hearing. My posts over the past few weeks have been unrelated to the hearing.
 
Pottsey said:
It was brought up in the recent hearing where it showed Screeech's duck/balloon idea is wrong. While I was talking about those videos over the past weeks I didn't know they would be in the hearing. My posts over the past few weeks have been unrelated to the hearing.
Click to expand...

Even though Pottsey is a bit mad he hasn't been speculating about the hearing :)
It's not his fault the Tic Tac BS was in the hearing.
 
keyser van someone said:
ok. Maybe ghosts? Maybe save that for another day of hearings.

Click to expand...
Who cares about Mick West who is just one of the usual BS artiest youtubers who likes to target gullible people so he can make money off his videos. Not really surprised you are into his BS videos where he makes stuff up based on subjective evidence rather then real evidence.
Anyway I don't know anything about Knapp, he is not someone I follow and it was a public hearing that anyone could go to. Why does it matter that some guy called Knapp was setting in the public free to watch area? If we wanted to we could have got flights over and got seats to watch it live. So what is your point that Knapp who looks to have an interest in UFO's is sitting a public hearing that any member of the public can sit in?
 
Pottsey said:
Who cares about Mick West who is just one of the usual BS artiest youtubers who likes to target gullible people so he can make money off his videos. Not really surprised you are into his BS videos where he makes stuff up based on subjective evidence rather then real evidence.
Anyway I don't know anything about Knapp, he is not someone I follow and it was a public hearing that anyone could go to. Why does it matter that some guy called Knapp was setting in the public free to watch area? If we wanted to we could have got flights over and got seats to watch it live. So what is your point that Knapp who looks to have an interest in UFO's is sitting a public hearing that any member of the public can sit in?
Click to expand...
It's interesting to me what you regard as what is isn't BS.
 
Pottsey said:
It was brought up in the recent hearing where it showed Screeech's duck/balloon idea is wrong. While I was talking about those videos over the past weeks I didn't know they would be in the hearing. My posts over the past few weeks have been unrelated to the hearing.
Click to expand...
My apologies then! However I will stress my original post was just a tongue in cheek comment that I’m shook you hadn’t reviewed the hearing footage with a bit more urgency given your interest in the topic! :D
 
Its a shame this thread is filled with stupid comments from both ends of the spectrum, the full on sceptics who wont entertain any of it regardless and the other end of the spectrum who lap up anything and call it fact, both as bad as each other, whatever your belief it's still an interesting topic and its a shame that it's being ruined with the bickering and rubbishing of all the interesting posts.
 
Last edited:
Pottsey said:
It was brought up in the recent hearing where it showed Screeech's duck/balloon idea is wrong. While I was talking about those videos over the past weeks I didn't know they would be in the hearing. My posts over the past few weeks have been unrelated to the hearing.
Click to expand...

These hearings showed people making wild statements, some of which are undermined by the videos offered as evidence.
 
Maximum Triceratops said:
Its a shame this thread is filled with stupid comments from both ends of the spectrum, the full on sceptics who wont entertain any of it regardless and the other end of the spectrum who lap up anything and call it fact, both as bad as each other, whatever your belief it's still an interesting topic and its a shame that it's being ruined with the bickering and rubbishing of all the interesting posts.
Click to expand...

That is always going to happen with a subject like this. Some people are making extra ordinary claims but providing zero evidence. I don't see this as any different from the Moon landings were faked crowd or 911 was an inside job and towers were bought down in controlled explosions. Actually those are more believable and they are totally not believable.
 
keyser van someone said:
You tell me. Knapp must be super interested in both UFOs and ghosts I guess. He's written a book about them.
Click to expand...
Perhaps he is super interested, I don't really know as I don't know anything about him. What has that got to do with this thread any why did you feel the need to post a link to him and bring up ghosts?
Your the one who brought ghosts into this. I don't see what relevance that has. You seem to be suggesting its some foundation to the story as per your link. What foundation and what story? Are you just trying to derail the thread with more nonsense from Mick West? So far all you are doing is backing up my opinion that Mick is a BS artist after clicks and money and you blindly believe his nonsense. What has any of this got to do with the hearing?

First you bring up breads and aliens and now ghosts. You say "its interesting to me what you regard as what is isn't BS." which I am starting to wonder about you with what you are posting.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom