Pentagon releases UFO footage

Screeeech said:
Ok, all you've done is just provide a load of spam, my question was specific for a reason,

Where is the evidence that these people:

Senior Chief Kavin Day, Patrick Hugues Petty Officer (Technician), Petty Officer Gary Voorhis, Senior Chief Kavin Day and Aex Dietrich.

Saw this craft ECM jamming the fighter jet, when did they say it and what exactly did they say?
Click to expand...
Your lying again. Other users provided links directly to the Congress Briefing. A 2nd video link was provided that was directly to the precise section where jamming was brought up for the 2nd time. To be fair we didn't provide a direct link to the first time jamming was brought up but its in the full briefing. What you call spam was me providing direct text quotes more then once of what was said at the hearing. Which clearly you just ignored. It was around about the time the mods removed you spam/trolling posts if you need a ball park area to start searching from. If you are really interested go look back as I am not wasting time posting the same data over and over for you to just ignore and then throw childish insults as me. The search bar is there for everyone to see I am telling the truth. Just how many times do you have to be provided with the quotes and links? I am sure you can use search opton and type jamming or ECM to find the multiple links and quotes.

"Senior Chief Kavin Day, Patrick Hugues Petty Officer (Technician), Petty Officer Gary Voorhis, Senior Chief Kavin Day and Aex Dietrich."
There testimony was posted ages ago long before the hearing. There where not at the hearing but was directly involved in the event as first hand witnesses from the navy ships. They have been brought up multiple times in this thread, how have you not read about them or seen the links?
 
Screeeech said:
Look at the people sat behind him in the hearing, bunch of complete charlatans. You can't have people like George Knapp and Jeremy Corbell in the room and take it seriously,

I think they've cooked the whole thing up, as an elaborate way to make some money and because politicians and government officials are all completely stupid, some of them have been conned hook-line and sinker, some of them probably don't know. I imagine some of them are making a bit of cash out of it too, and I also suspect that this will come out later down the line as a massive hoax.
Click to expand...
This has been brought up and explained before. More proof you ignore posts. It was a public hearing that anyone was free to go to. That area was the public seating area for you know the public. Those people where not part of the hearing they where just members of the public watching it with other members of the public.
 
Pottsey said:
This has been brought up and explained before. More proof you ignore posts. It was a public hearing that anyone was free to go to. That area was the public seating area for you know the public. Those people where not part of the hearing they where just members of the public watching it with other members of the public.
Click to expand...

No Pottsey, non of this has been explained at all. That’s the problem.
 
MookJong said:
This is what I cannot get my head around when people completely denounce Grusch. I understand people being sceptical of the claims, but you have to meet it half way, do you honestly think this would have got this far, that two bills would be written into law to facilitate declassification of the evidence, if it were just hearsay?
Click to expand...
It's all claims and hearsay, under oath.
 
jigger said:
It’s pretty clear the bird in the video isn’t blocking anything, because birds don’t possess those technologies, and nothing reported was large enough to generate the power levels required.

So IF, something was blocking sensors all these people missed it. TBH the claims of sensor spoofing is just a distraction to this investigation it’s really insignificant to the overall statements and claims being made. I’d focus on the outrageous claimed Mach 70+ plus performance of these craft as that is the real magic and what would be important to discover evidence of. Mach 7 at sea level in a flying tic tac shaped craft would be amazing enough. 60 miles in seconds? WOW, Mach 140! now we are into super alien tech/hand of god dreamland territory.
Click to expand...
Its pretty clear its not a bird and there is zero evidence its a bird. Do you have any proof its a bird? As everything points to its not a Bird. This entire bird thing is made up by you.
 
Pottsey said:
What you call spam was me providing direct text quotes more then once of what was said at the hearing.
Click to expand...

No - the spam is how you create a wall of text of waffle, conflate several different things together - then when asked specific details about it, such as "When, who, where?" you get upset and say I'm a liar or some other nonsense.

Pottsey said:
"Senior Chief Kavin Day, Patrick Hugues Petty Officer (Technician), Petty Officer Gary Voorhis, Senior Chief Kavin Day and Aex Dietrich."
There testimony was posted ages ago long before the hearing. There where not at the hearing but was directly involved in the event as first hand witnesses from the navy ships. They have been brought up multiple times in this thread, how have you not read about them or seen the links?
Click to expand...

Yes, and I'm asking you EXACTLY, with all the details - what occurred in relation to ECM jamming, what did they see? what happened? what was jammed? where did it happen? what was the outcome?
 
Last edited:
Pottsey said:
Its pretty clear its not a bird and there is zero evidence its a bird. Do you have any proof its a bird? As everything points to its not a Bird. This entire bird thing is made up by you.
Click to expand...

Nothing other than a video of what appears to be a cormorant behaving as you’d expect a cormorant to behave
 
Screeeech said:
No - the spam is how you create a wall of text of waffle, conflate several different things together - then when asked specific details about it, such as "When, who, where?" you get upset and say I'm a liar or some other nonsense.



Yes, and I'm asking you EXACTLY, with all the details - what occurred in relation to ECM jamming, what did they see? what happened? what was jammed? where did it happen? what was the outcome?
Click to expand...
The specific details you asked for have been provide to you half a dozen times over the past week both as text quotes and direct links. Go use the search bar. My lunch break is over, I am heading back to work.
 
jigger said:
Nothing other than a video of what appears to be a cormorant behaving as you’d expect a cormorant to behave
Click to expand...
What video are you watching as there was no cormorants in any videos we are talking about. Just like this flapping of wings you talked about that only you can see and no one else. I think your a CT nut making all this bird nonsense up. Unless you can prove its a bird?
 
Pottsey said:
The specific details you asked for have been provide to you half a dozen times over the past week both as text quotes and direct links. Go use the search bar. My lunch break is over, I am heading back to work.
Click to expand...

No they haven't, I haven't even asked about the ECM jamming stuff since recently - I'm asking for clarification on it, because you've been banging on and on about it and I want to know the details.
 
Pottsey said:
What video are you watching as there was no cormorants in any videos we are talking about. Just like this flapping of wings you talked about that only you can see and no one else. I think your a CT nut making all this bird nonsense up. Unless you can prove its a bird?
Click to expand...

You know what I’m talking about. Come chap this is beyond it now.
 
Last edited:
Screeeech said:
Look at the people sat behind him in the hearing, bunch of complete charlatans. You can't have people like George Knapp and Jeremy Corbell in the room and take it seriously,

I think they've cooked the whole thing up, as an elaborate way to make some money and because politicians and government officials are all completely stupid, some of them have been conned hook-line and sinker, some of them probably don't know. I imagine some of them are making a bit of cash out of it too, and I also suspect that this will come out later down the line as a massive hoax.
Click to expand...
But this just doesn't align with what is happening. If this is a grift why involve the IG and make such radical complaints that could be investigated and backfire? Why not just do a Bob Lazar and keep it to the media circuit? I can equally ask you where your evidence this is a grift and a hoax?
 
MookJong said:
But this just doesn't align with what is happening. If this is a grift why involve the IG and make such radical complaints that could be investigated and backfire?
Click to expand...

Because they're taking a risk, they're seeing how far they can push it - get it as far as possible into the public domain, getting the government involved only makes it seem more credible to the layman, so ultimately they'll make more money by doing this.

MookJong said:
I can equally ask you where your evidence this is a grift and a hoax?
Click to expand...

I don't have any, it's a guess based primarily on my own instincts.

When I see Jeremy Corbell sat next to George Knapp, in that hearing - my BS detector is literally just screaming constantly.
 
MookJong said:
But this just doesn't align with what is happening. If this is a grift why involve the IG and make such radical complaints that could be investigated and backfire? Why not just do a Bob Lazar and keep it to the media circuit? I can equally ask you where your evidence this is a grift and a hoax?
Click to expand...

Some men just wanna watch the world burn/Alfred off

Who knows under/over medicated. Maybe Aliens. Those making the claims need to provide the evidence and the burden of proof is set at astronomical heights with some of these claims. It’s boarding on liable.
 
jigger said:
You know what I’m talking about. Come chap this is beyond it now.
Click to expand...
You sound like a full on conspiracy theorist who's making up nonsense about special things only you can see.


keyser van someone said:
Anything that hasn't already been made public?

It's up for debate about what that is evidence of. Something, nothing, noise, duck, alien, etc.
Click to expand...
Let me guess yet again you skipped all the links I have been giving you and you have been ignoring everything about the field trip to Eglen base by Congress.
Calling everything hearsay is just you being disingenuous at this point. It was confirmed Congress was given radar, photos, documentation e.c.t That is not hearsay.
 
Pottsey said:
It was confirmed Congress was given radar, photos, documentation e.c.t That is not hearsay.
Click to expand...

Well, it's the very definition of hearsay.

Somebody says they were shown something by somebody else, but they have nothing substantive they can actually show us.

hearsay


noun
noun: hearsay
  1. information received from other people which cannot be substantiated; rumour.
Click to expand...
 
Screeeech said:
Well, it's the very definition of hearsay.

Somebody says they were shown something by somebody else, but they have nothing substantive they can actually show us.
Click to expand...

Someone claims they went to a place. They seen a radar tape showing an anomalous result. Clearly a cover up in progress and proves outrageous claims.

That seems more than enough for Pottsey to start name calling anyone that questions the claims.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom