To be so sure, you must have personally examined this ‘evidence’ for yourself?
No, I haven’t but I have seen what the people have said who have examined the evidence personally and we have zero reason to doubt them.
Which is my problem with your scam idea to sell books. At this point it makes absolutely zero sense and goes completely against the facts and evidence.
I see it sort of like this.
If some guy at the pub tells me there is a hidden illegal classified SAP running skunkworks style projects and illegally testing them, I am going have major doubts. But listen as its entertaining.
If then see this guy on TV giving interviews and the interviews have said they vetted this person background and looked into who he says he is and its all real. Ok now it’s not only entertaining its now looking a little more real but I still have major doubts.
Next it turns out the guy worked at a highly classified government project which was not even publicly known at the time and he had direct access to the evidence in question. OK now my doubt is starting to fade away but it’s still pretty strong.
Next it turns out this person was on a 130k to 150k wage, $1million+ pension and is risking jail time, risking pension and risking reputation and was personally briefing the president on intelligence matters. Ok now more doubt is going and I now have doubt this is some scam to sell books. Why give all that up to just make £10k selling books?
Next the guy says he has been running an investigation and has collected a load of evidence and it been shown he did have access to this classified data from his job. He is not only willing but has handed over evidence to the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community. The IGIC is not only trained to look out for scams but they specialise in investigations involving classified data. The IGIC comes back and says this evidence was handed over, its valid, has merit and is serious. Now I am not just viewing it as entertainment but taking it more seriously. Now I have real trouble believing its some sort of scam to sell books.
So, a SKIF committee is created some of the people are completely anti UAP and don’t remotely believe any of this going into the SKIF. These are highly ranked people with high classification access. They come out the SKIF some of them visibly shaken and disturbed and almost everyone single one gives statement saying the evidence is valid, has merit, is real. More doubt drops away and I just don’t see at this point how it can be just a bunch of people speaking BS making up nonsense to sell books.
Fast forward and a muti year long Congress investigation again made up of high ranked people with classification access. They too come to the same conclusion and while they cannot give us the direct evidence they can describe the evidence which they did in the report and confirm they have direct access to muti sensor data, high resolution data and more. This investigation involved direct field trips to the locations provided by the original guy. What reason do I have to doubt this?
At this point how do you justified it’s just a bunch of people BS talking as a scam to sell books? This isn’t even taking into account all the heads of department and admirals and other who are all confirmed the events.
So while I am not remotely 100% convinced neither can I just write this off as just entertaining nonsense anymore.
Did you even read this weeks Congress investigation report? What did you make of it given it gives the sources of there evidence and describes in detail the evidence they viewed? EDIT: As I said before if its just BS talk to sell books how do you explain the SKIF investigation, ICIG investigation and now the Congress investigation all agreeing the evidence is real and has merit?
