• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

piledriver - Official AMD FX4300,FX6300 and FX8350 review thread

Not true the 8320 is in stock at 1 online store which i cant mention
Must be the one that shipped mine today. Now I've just got to wait for the rest of my build to arrive too.

I'm going from an E2200 booting off a 74Gb Raptor and 4 gb 1066MHz DDR2 to an FX 8320 with a Samsung 830 SSD bootdrive and 8 gigs of 2133 Mhz DDR3. I may find myself too shocked to provide a proper evaluation for days. Still need to order a case and cooling though. To go air or water...and which midsize tower for each?
 
Also think OCUK had stock at one point?

The website says they have the 8320, but not on the Piledriver section page. :confused:

Must be the one that shipped mine today. Now I've just got to wait for the rest of my build to arrive too.

I'm going from an E2200 booting off a 74Gb Raptor and 4 gb 1066MHz DDR2 to an FX 8320 with a Samsung 830 SSD bootdrive and 8 gigs of 2133 Mhz DDR3. I may find myself too shocked to provide a proper evaluation for days. Still need to order a case and cooling though. To go air or water...and which midsize tower for each?

Now that's an upgrade! :cool:
 
Is there anything expected soon after the 8350 (that would fit in the same mobos) that is coming around soon (a refresh or another faster chip?)? I'm toying between a small upgrade from my 8120 to 83xx and waiting a bit longer, as long as I don't need to change mobo.
 
Did see something interesting when reading the 8320/8350 owners thread on overclockers.net. Apparently if you turn off cores 1, 3, 5, & 7 iso that you only have one core per module it'll boost IPC circa 20%. Very interesting for when you're running those lower threaded games and the like. This'll also mean you can clock it a little bit higher at the same time so will make it much more competitive in WoW and the like.
 
Did see something interesting when reading the 8320/8350 owners thread on overclockers.net. Apparently if you turn off cores 1, 3, 5, & 7 iso that you only have one core per module it'll boost IPC circa 20%. Very interesting for when you're running those lower threaded games and the like. This'll also mean you can clock it a little bit higher at the same time so will make it much more competitive in WoW and the like.

just swapped my 8350 order for a 8320.

will have togive this a go.

Do you have links?
 
There seems to be plenty of 8320 stock knocking around but no 8350, I am guessing they're struggling with yields again.

Did see something interesting when reading the 8320/8350 owners thread on overclockers.net. Apparently if you turn off cores 1, 3, 5, & 7 iso that you only have one core per module it'll boost IPC circa 20%. Very interesting for when you're running those lower threaded games and the like. This'll also mean you can clock it a little bit higher at the same time so will make it much more competitive in WoW and the like.

Wasn't the scheduler patches eventually only included in Windows 8 supposed to achieve that? if you only run a 4 thread game it should only use one core per module anyway?
 
Last edited:
just swapped my 8350 order for a 8320.

will have togive this a go.

Do you have links?

It's on this thread somewhere. I don't know if that's true but I'll try it on mine once it's assembled and see.

It'll be interesting to see how far I can push it, I'm going aircooling with a Thermalright Silver Arrow so may not get quite as high as some of the watercooled rigs have done.
 
There seems to be plenty of 8320 stock knocking around but no 8350, I am guessing they're struggling with yields again.



Wasn't the scheduler patches eventually only included in Windows 8 supposed to achieve that? if you only run a 4 thread game it should only use one core per module anyway?

Yeah, I thought Windows 8 did that by default...
 
Go for something like Fritz chess, set it to 4 threads (When it's an 8 core) and then when it's a quad core try 4 again, see if it improves.

Then Cinebench single thread benchmark with it as an 8 core, then as a quad core.

Although, if the scheduler patch doesn't work correctly in some benchmarks, it may show a gain when it should already be getting that performance.
 
Back
Top Bottom