• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

piledriver - Official AMD FX4300,FX6300 and FX8350 review thread

:confused:

It's 8C/8T

To use 4 cores, you'd just set Prime to use 4 threads, it'd use the 4 cores. (2 modules)

I figured you were trying to be clever, but you failed at it, it'd be 4C/8T ;) (If you call the modules cores)

right i see, set 4 cores in prime, yes, but you can't do that in heaven.

I wasn't trying to be clever, you misunderstood.

I was saying the chip has 8 integer and 4 threads, your talking about the software. :)
 
Unless I'm being silly?


Its confusing,

350w on one rig with 8 cores but with an unmentioned GPU (prime-95 only)

420w on a different setup, 6950 (Prime-95 and heaven) only 4 cores.

PII x6 @ 3.8Ghz (unmentioned GPU) prime-95 = 290w

PII x6 @ 3.8Ghz (unmentioned GPU) heaven = 420w

Have i got that right?

If i assume the unmentioned GPU in the x6 heaven run is the same 6950 he used in the FX run with only 4 cores then the FX-83## / 4 cores / 4.6Ghz uses the same power as a 3.8GHZ PII x6.

What i would like to know is what will the FX-83## use with the 6950 on heaven with all its 8 cores running at 4.6Ghz
 
Last edited:
What i would like to know is what will the FX-83## use with the 6950 on heaven with all its 8 cores running at 4.6Ghz

480 watts

Piledriver 8350 at 4.6GHz 8 threads on prime95 large FFT
MSI Hd 6950 running heaven 2.5 benchmark 4x antialiasing full screen 1680 x 1050. (OCUK test spec)
8GB DDR3 at 1840MHz
Sandisk extreme 240GB
WD Black 1 TB
WD RE2 500GB
ASUS M5A99x
4 x 120mm fans
DGX Soundcard installed
2x DVB-T card installed
Seasonic 650x Gold PSU

Anything else? :)

Looking at the above, I am at 73% of the PSU, so a 650 gold would be about the minimum spec you would want if everything was as shown. This is unlikely in my opinion but may be possible in some games. A 7850 would use less power for about the same performance but if you are going for max on the graphics with SLI, x-fire, you would want more, a 750W upwards.
 
Last edited:
480 watts

Piledriver 8350 at 4.6GHz 8 threads on prime95 large FFT
MSI Hd 6950 running heaven 2.5 benchmark 4x antialiasing full screen 1680 x 1050. (OCUK test spec)
8GB DDR3 at 1840MHz
Sandisk extreme 240GB
WD Black 1 TB
WD RE2 500GB
ASUS M5A99x
DGX Soundcard installed
2x DVB-T card installed
Seasonic 650x Gold PSU

Anything else? :)

Looking at the above, I am at 73% of the PSU, so a 650 gold would be about the minimum spec you would want if everything was as shown. This is unlikely in my opinion but may be possible in some games. A 7850 would use less power for about the same performance but if you are going for max on the graphics with SLI, x-fire, you would want more, a 750W upwards.


Thanks :)

@ 4.6Ghz the FX-83## uses 60 Watts more than a Phenom II x6 at 3.8Ghz

Thats not bad, thats really not bad at all.
 
I am going to save my 4.6 profile in bios and use 4.2 as a 24/7 clock on this processor. Core temps will drop down to 40ish from 55 with my current cooling and the fan profiles will be at 30%, nice and quiet. The project is 'silentpiler' after all. Following lots of testing on software I use, I am very pleased with the processor performance, the system is highly stable, responsive and at stock very quiet.

I sold my 1090T at a bargain price of £60 (£55 nett) so if I sell the 'free' games, the actual cost will be £168 - £55 - say £35 for the games = £78. This is acceptable to me as although the stock performance is not a huge amount different to the x6 @ 3.8, the processor is newer, the potential performance with overclocking and the two extra cores is there to use and if I watercool at some stage possibly more.
 
Back
Top Bottom