PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS - Thread

Psycho Sonny said:
don't know what video you were watching but it was the same throughout the whole video maybe 2 fps faster at points. and 1 specific point where it was quite a bit faster but that could have been due to anything. at some points the slower ram was even faster which goes to show you how it doesn't prove anything
Click to expand...

Try watching again :p try from 2min onwards
Even some part where the fps takes a hit and the faster ram just continues on.

It also seems the more demanding the area the better chance the fps will be for example the lobby area loads players on screen.
 
I know this game needs a lot more optimisation, but what card will run this to a good standard as my 390 is struggling badly? Got everything on low with full draw distance to keep my FPS at a decent rate.

CPU is a 4790 which is cruising.
 
PapaLazaru said:
I know this game needs a lot more optimisation, but what card will run this to a good standard as my 390 is struggling badly? Got everything on low with full draw distance to keep my FPS at a decent rate.

CPU is a 4790 which is cruising.
Click to expand...

What resolution? At 1080p you should easy keep way above 60fps
My last GPU R9290 was perfectly fine at 1080p
1440p was a struggle though
 
Hiya, need some help/advise with this game & my PC/Internet.

Have a haswell i5-k (not overclocked), 16 GB Ram & an Asus R9 290X, the game is installed on a secondary SSHD 1TB drive,
the primary is a 250 GB SSD. Hard drives are set to never turn off & Power is set to Performance. Everything is updated software wise.

Main problem apart from i'm crap is that when the shooting starts at medium to close range my FPS hits the floor, 1 fps or 5 fps seems to be common,
even when spectating a friend. when just running about or sneaking around it's in the 80 to 60 range. At long range it's ok but anything closer is terrible but not every single time, just most of the time.

1920 x 1080 with high to medium settings, also have the same thing on 1650 & 1050.....

Is it my internet, server based?

No idea what to do, any ideas to fix it ?
 
Little*Freak said:
Hiya, need some help/advise with this game & my PC/Internet.

Have a haswell i5-k (not overclocked), 16 GB Ram & an Asus R9 290X, the game is installed on a secondary SSHD 1TB drive,
the primary is a 250 GB SSD. Hard drives are set to never turn off & Power is set to Performance. Everything is updated software wise.

Main problem apart from i'm crap is that when the shooting starts at medium to close range my FPS hits the floor, 1 fps or 5 fps seems to be common,
even when spectating a friend. when just running about or sneaking around it's in the 80 to 60 range. At long range it's ok but anything closer is terrible but not every single time, just most of the time.

1920 x 1080 with high to medium settings, also have the same thing on 1650 & 1050.....

Is it my internet, server based?

No idea what to do, any ideas to fix it ?
Click to expand...

your CPU is holding you back. you need to overclock it, your card is just slightly slower than a 1060 3gb and i used to use that card and i hit 110 fps with ultra-medium settings with shadows and effects and post processing on low.
 
PapaLazaru said:
I know this game needs a lot more optimisation, but what card will run this to a good standard as my 390 is struggling badly? Got everything on low with full draw distance to keep my FPS at a decent rate.

CPU is a 4790 which is cruising.
Click to expand...

@ 1080p with that setup you should have no issues running a mix of low-high settings.

@ 1440p it will be struggling with everything on low and you need a 1070 minimum
 
if it were me and you want decent constant fps with no lag modern ryzen or decent i7 and a 1070 gtx or 1080 gtx at 1080.anything less you going to get drops. 1080 ultra 1080ti can go to 60 fps. so lower settings and a good cpu is needed.
 
~>Dg<~ said:
if it were me and you want decent constant fps with no lag modern ryzen or decent i7 and a 1070 gtx or 1080 gtx at 1080.anything less you going to get drops. 1080 ultra 1080ti can go to 60 fps. so lower settings and a good cpu is needed.
Click to expand...

you don't need a gtx 1080 for 1080p, i got 110 fps with a 1060 3gb and that is with pretty decent settings too. you do need it for 1440p however if you want high fps (120hz) but a 1070 will do 1440p @ 60hz fine.

also you don't need 8 threads for smooth play. i run a i7600k which is 4 threads and it's stock too not bothered clocking as i don't need to. 7600k is now available for less than £200 brand new. i wouldnt' bother spending £350 which is nearly double on an i7 to get a 5% boost at best.

the game runs poo on any system compared to other games. the game basically has zero optimisation.
 
Psycho Sonny said:
you don't need a gtx 1080 for 1080p, i got 110 fps with a 1060 3gb and that is with pretty decent settings too. you do need it for 1440p however if you want high fps (120hz) but a 1070 will do 1440p @ 60hz fine.

also you don't need 8 threads for smooth play. i run a i7600k which is 4 threads and it's stock too not bothered clocking as i don't need to. 7600k is now available for less than £200 brand new. i wouldnt' bother spending £350 which is nearly double on an i7 to get a 5% boost at best.

the game runs poo on any system compared to other games. the game basically has zero optimisation.
Click to expand...

Did you not play this game in early stages? Lag town got its name from 20fps being the norm lol the game has had loads of optimization its just not complete yet.

Lag town now really isn't a lag town RX vega 1440p I stay very close to 100fps with some dips onto 60s depending where I am.
 
shankly1985 said:
Did you not play this game in early stages? Lag town got its name from 20fps being the norm lol the game has had loads of optimization its just not complete yet.

Lag town now really isn't a lag town RX vega 1440p I stay very close to 100fps with some dips onto 60s depending where I am.
Click to expand...

they still have a long way to go. 20fps? must have had just been released to get some cash in if it was that bad.

i used ultra settings. then i turned a few things to low and guess what i got zero boost in fps in fact they went down. it's stupid how some settings have zero effect on fps going from ultra to low or the other way. i let GE pick the optimal settings then i turn some of them down to give me a competitive edge. effects just put more stuff on your screen to detract your attention. same for ultra foliage. view distance seems to have zero effect on FPS from low to ultra. i wouldn't say it's optimised at all.
 
Psycho Sonny said:
they still have a long way to go. 20fps? must have had just been released to get some cash in if it was that bad.

i used ultra settings. then i turned a few things to low and guess what i got zero boost in fps in fact they went down. it's stupid how some settings have zero effect on fps going from ultra to low or the other way. i let GE pick the optimal settings then i turn some of them down to give me a competitive edge. effects just put more stuff on your screen to detract your attention. same for ultra foliage. view distance seems to have zero effect on FPS from low to ultra. i wouldn't say it's optimised at all.
Click to expand...

The reason you don't see any difference from view distance is because your Cpu is more than enough. That setting is very Cpu
Shadows, and resolution are the biggest performance hitters.

I not saying it's perfect far from it all I saying it's night and day from how it released.
You said it has had no optimizations all I doing is correcting you :p
Next patch shadows and server optimisation.

The other settings, foliage etc are designed to not give an advantage over someone playing very low so the performance hit is very little.
Matter of a fact a lot of the settings have very little performance hit.
Resolution, screen scale and shadows are the big ones and also have the biggest impact on image quality.
 
it's not just view distance. i turned down 3 settings from ultra to low/very low all at the same time and no change to fps.

now you mention it shadows is the one that eats up fps as does effects. post processing seems to make the game blurry no idea why anyone would have that on ultra. most of them don't have any hit on fps though going from 1 extreme to the other. which wouldn't happen if it was optimised unless everything is CPU dependent.
 
Psycho Sonny said:
it's not just view distance. i turned down 3 settings from ultra to low/very low all at the same time and no change to fps.

now you mention it shadows is the one that eats up fps as does effects. post processing seems to make the game blurry no idea why anyone would have that on ultra. most of them don't have any hit on fps though going from 1 extreme to the other. which wouldn't happen if it was optimised unless everything is CPU dependent.
Click to expand...

That doesn't make sense, if a graphics setting shadow for example has little performance hit going from ultra to low that means the game is very optimised.
Graphics settings are only one part of the story with this game and are by no means the biggest issue.
a lot of the performance issues people have is actually from the server.
We know this because at times within a squad each one of us all have had the same frame rate drop and server desync.

Having a game where all the graphics settings perform very well across the range is actually very good for low end to high end users.

Edit
Shadows is a bad example because that setting is quite demanding and does effect image quality a lot.
Foliage would have been a better choice.
 
Must admit I don't really understand how server causes fps drops. Certainly does seem to be the case though.

Just got my new GPU and maxed out textures but other than that I've left at very low.

Other than textures they all seem to put you at a disadvantage despite making it prettier.
 
obviously people are not bench marking this game as many have. just seen someone saying they get 100 fps with a 1060 :p


to get 100 fps constant at 1080 res you need a 1070 gtx and all lowish settings that will drop just under 100 fps but avg about 120 with a decent cpu.

https://imgur.com/a/B3h53

if you want high fps no big drops you need a modern pc.ryzen cpu or a modern i7 and a 1070 gtx or a 1080 for 1080 res.otherwise you get the big drops people talk about.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom