Caporegime
Can't see it coming October at all, no wa Sony expect people to drop £350 on PSVR and then £XXX on Neo.
Unless they expect us all to get second jobs.
Ken Kutaragi says herro.
Can't see it coming October at all, no wa Sony expect people to drop £350 on PSVR and then £XXX on Neo.
Unless they expect us all to get second jobs.
If this has a rumoured October time release, how comes we still don't have any hard facts about the spec and images of console?
Very surprised Sony didn't give any Neo news. Tough act to follow I guess
Andrew House more worried about losing PS4 players to PC. That's his reason for Neo.
https://www.theguardian.com/technol...n-boss-andrew-house-ps4-neo-microsoft-scorpio
I would definitely throw myself into that group. I only started playing games on my PC late last year. And this year alone I've spent well over £1.5k. Changing the GPU three times and purchasing a new ultrawide monitor.
In reality unless consoles become modular there is nothing he can do to stop people like me making that move.
People jumped from the Xbox to PS4 because of MS, Sony offered a more powerful console for the right price sure and that was a factor but the main reason was because Sony gave the gamer what they wanted where MS tried to tell the gamer what they'd get and if they didn't like it they could always buy the xbox 360... they pushed it as a TV box and not a games console and made you pay for a kinnect whether you wanted it or not, they messed up and paid the price.
Is the demand for 4k really that high? I really don't think it is.
Just release a modular console. Problem solved
Im expecting the ownership of 4K UHDTVs to still be the minority by the time the Neo/Scorpio are replaced - beyond them falling to reasonable prices that makes them appeal to people looking to naturally replace their old TV theres little impetus to buy one when decent 4k content is pretty much non-existent outside of UHD BD. The failure of getting ubiquitous 1080p content is largely the cause of that IMO.
ps3ud0
Yep, I bought a new TV at the start of the year and went for a good 1080p one because a similarly-good 4K one would have been twice as expensive. My Blu-rays are 1080p, my games are 1080p, Sky is 1080i. Pointless paying more when I'd see little benefit for at least a couple of years yet.
I would hate to be a person that early adopted 4k UHD and doesnt have a TV set that supports HDR (if it doesnt youve got a 8bit panel not a 10bit one IIRC). The same happened with early HDTVs that didnt have HDMI/HDCP connections.
The HD era makes me very pr-ickly regards jumping early even before you consider how far behind content is. Im still in the old ways of waiting for a TV to die before I replace it...
ps3ud0
How much truth is in this is unknown, but could be correct.
https://twitter.com/isaparrot/status/744166963845312513