Poll: Boris voters - is he camping with a baby?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 68110
  • Start date Start date
Last edited:
Is the offical line from the government that he was camping or something?

Personaly Id like to see obligatory photos of one of them in bed in the tent before Id say he was camping but Ill also say I dont really care. Im just interested why people have gone so sure on him camping unless its meant to be the offical line.

So back to the question.

Was he camping with the baby or in the cottage not camping?

@garnett those photoshops are hilarious. :D
 
He's attempting to mask his idiocy in silliness. He is ignorant to the fact that the majority here discussing with him appear a lot smarter and probably are wise to his attempted distraction.

It's a shame really, being so closed off stops you from getting better at life.
So the question I asked originally, that's triggered so much vitriol from you was "who believes Boris Johnson is holidaying in a tent with his girlfriend and their infant child?"

It's so idiotic, I believe you've refused to give an answer.

:rolleyes:

But, yeah, I'm the closed minded one.
 
So the question I asked originally, that's triggered so much vitriol from you was "who believes Boris Johnson is holidaying in a tent with his girlfriend and their infant child?"

It's so idiotic, I believe you've refused to give an answer.

:rolleyes:

But, yeah, I'm the closed minded one.
1 - there's a difference between legitimate criticism and vitriol.
2 - I said I'd answer once you answered my original question, which you continually evaded with repetitive vagueness
 
fevaH5f.gif
 
1 - there's a difference between legitimate criticism and vitriol.
2 - I said I'd answer once you answered my original question, which you continually evaded with repetitive vagueness
I answered multiple times, and you just insisted it wasn't enough - like the kid that repeatedly asks "why?"

There's nothing stopping you answering my question other than your arbitrary unilaterally-imposed prerequisite.
 
I answered multiple times, and you just insisted it wasn't enough - like the kid that repeatedly asks "why?"

There's nothing stopping you answering my question other than your arbitrary unilaterally-imposed prerequisite.
Using big words doesn’t make you look clever.
 
Even more ridiculous is that in one of the photos Symonds is wearing an almost £90 tshirt.

I dont think thats ridiculous tbh. It may seem it to us, but they have money.

When you have money, if you see a shirt you like, you buy it. Doesnt matter if its £2 or £200.
 
Back
Top Bottom