Poll: Boris voters - is he camping with a baby?

[Akagi]

Well this took a weird dive in tone.

Did it? It has been a trainwreck since the thread was posted.

 

[SexyGreyFox]

@garnett
Absolutely disgusting, Sunday papers full of photoshopped pictures of Boris with his partner and baby obviously on a farm near his house.
What do you think?

 

[Devilman]

That is literally what you did. But sure, whatever. As you were.

So by your logic, anyone who draws attention to another person's wrongdoing is therefore automatically culpable of the same wrongdoing?

Wow, you really are a simpleton aren't you?

 

[dowie]

Garnett hasn’t been seen here since Friday night lol.

he must realise what a plank he looks

Seems your post has triggered an update... and he's not really elaborating much after his initial narrative fell apart, more evasion and terse replies.

Anyway since then photos have been released including partner and baby:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ares-photos-PM-hiking-Wilfred-baby-sling.html

Yes, that does look like Scotland... not Greece or a yacht... oh how "credulous" people have been

It is funny though how easily people are triggered by a silly GD thread.

I think that was the intent when posting the thread no? OP wanted some reason to have a go at Brexiters in GD and it backfired somewhat.

In addition to illustrating that the warped perspective here is perhaps more a case of Boris derangement syndrome among some it certainly seems to have triggered this particularly angry remainer:

What is even the point in your post?

What a pointless post.

As opposed to your post which demonstrates shear ignorance and total lack of self-awareness?

Take a look in the mirror big boy...

You sit here talking **** in a forum acting like you're someone special.

Grow up you pathetic infant.

^^^ I think that counts as "triggered" right?

 

[Akagi]

So by your logic, anyone who draws attention to another person's wrongdoing is therefore automatically culpable of the same wrongdoing?

Wow, you really are a simpleton aren't you?

Sorry but I don't think it is I who is the simpleton in this "argument" we appear to be having.

Maybe re-read what I originally said and you might understand.

 

[Devilman]

Sorry but I don't think it is I who is the simpleton in this "argument" we appear to be having.

Well they do say ignorance is bliss... must be nice for you not to realize how stupid your logic is. I almost envy you. Actually no, I don't.

 

[Akagi]

Well they do say ignorance is bliss... must be nice for you not to realize how stupid your logic is. I almost envy you. Actually no, I don't.

I really don't care what you do or dont think or feel.

Just stop before you embarrass yourself further.

 

[Deleted member 68110]

Seems your post has triggered an update... and he's not really elaborating much after his initial narrative fell apart, more evasion and terse replies.

Anyway since then photos have been released including partner and baby:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ares-photos-PM-hiking-Wilfred-baby-sling.html

Yes, that does look like Scotland... not Greece or a yacht... oh how "credulous" people have been

I think that was the intent of the thread no? OP wanted some reason to have a go at Brexiters in GD and it backfired somewhat.

In addition to illustrating that the warped perspective here is perhaps more a case of Boris derangement syndrome among some of the angrier remainers it certainly seems to have triggered this particularly angry one:

^^^ I think that counts as "triggered" right?

Ah back to the fallacies, I see.

I don't think he went camping with his infant baby, you show me a picture of them walking, and bluster about it proving your point.

Do you think we all forget how fixated and pedantic you get about minute issues of evidence posted by others? Why do you think such a glaring problem with your evidence isn't going to get spotted?

This Boris Derangement Syndrome you exhibit, where you must defend him to the hilt against people daring to question his story about going camping... It's very odd.

 

[dowie]

Ah back to the fallacies, I see.

I don't think he went camping with his infant baby , you show me a picture of them walking and bluster about it proving your point.

Do you think we all forget how fixated and ledanric you get about minute issues of evidence? Why do you think such a glaring problem with your evidence isn't going to get spotted?

This Boris Derangement Syndrome you exhibit, where you must defend him to the hilt against people daring to question his story about going camping... It's very odd.

So what do you think happened? Your earlier posts seemed to imply that she wasn't even there.

You've spent several posts avoiding questions etc.. go ahead and provide some clarification:

 

[Deleted member 68110]

So what do you think happened? You've spent several posts avoiding questions etc.. go ahead and provide some clarification:

It's right there in the post where I listed all the questions I believe you asked and answered them one by one. The post you called "terse".

I think you'd have to be credulous to believe Johnson spent more time in a tent than on a yacht.

 

[Dis86]

@Tony Edwards your lover is doing a silly again, quick, come to his rescue on your white stallion!

 

[chroniclard]

Most of the bad/condescending tone is coming from the right wingers. I dont think they want their supposed 'holy grail' deliverer to have died from bat aids.

Deliverer of job losses, recession and general incompetent chaos. AKA Brexit. #GolfClap

 

[james.miller]

Weird thread. I can feel the ovulation-driven anger just reading it.

 

[dowie]

As suspected.. another terse response from the OP - just a reminder of some of his arguments to support the vague claim he now refuses to elaborate on - he was initially implying the partner and kid weren't there at all and didn't grasp why a pap shot from a distance just showing Boris isn't really informative on that matter - that it is a bit different to an official shoot or some privately taken holiday pics... (which have since been published) was a point he struggled to grasp... but no, it's other people who are credulous here:

There's no photo of either girlfriend or child, which defies all historic precedents - where reliably the PM is always photographed with at least their spouse.

The holiday coincides at the time of a global pandemic, and (until they went through a u turn they insisted would not happen) one of the biggest policy scandals - over the A-level grades - in recent UK political history.

For so many reasons it seems only the most willingly credulous would buy this story that Johnson took his infant child camping.

Your counter to "lack of photos" appears to be "all there are are pap shots" - you'll have to expand on how that counter works.

Yeah, other points would include:- contrary history of no inclination to "rough it", history of turbulent relationship with partner, history of lack of parernal/familial instincts/compulsions...

OP - hahaha brexiters are credulous

Also OP, doubting the girlfriend or child are there:

There's no photo of either girlfriend or child,

 

[Akagi]

Weird thread. I can feel the ovulation-driven anger just reading it.

Yeah it just seems like no amount of evidence is going to make a difference. 24 hour spy cameras inside the tent wouldn't be good enough. Its just impossible that they actually SLEPT in a tent.

 

[NVP]

Not really.. more like #faceshoot

Not sure what your bukake obsession has to do with this, but acting superior whilst labelling others pathetic is rather odious.

Just stop before you embarrass yourself further.

He can't embarrass himself, as he said; ignorance is bliss.

As suspected.. another terse response from the OP - just a reminder of some of his arguments to support the vague claim he now refuses to elaborate on

Oh I do love your posts sometimes Mr Dowie sir

 

[Uther]

What a car crash.

 

[Deleted member 68110]

As suspected.. another terse response from the OP - just a reminder of some of his arguments to support the vague claim he now refuses to elaborate on - he was initially implying the partner and kid weren't there at all and didn't grasp why a pap shot from a distance just showing Boris isn't really informative on that matter - that it is a bit different to an official shoot or some privately taken holiday pics... (which have since been published) was a point he struggled to grasp... but no, it's other people who are credulous here:

OP - hahaha brexiters are credulous

Also OP, doubting the girlfriend of child are there:

Are you unable to speak to me directly? Really odd approach to social interaction.

I said there was no picture. There wasn't. Now Carrie Symonds has provided some to the media.

As I've said - in the OP and throughout, you need to be very credulous to believe Johnson went on a camping holiday.

I note that the papers that reported it as such have shifted to calling it a "stay at a cottage". No doubt it will shift further.

Given your insistent that my posts answering all your points are somehow "terse", and the urgency and length of your posts defending Johnson, you certainly seem very triggered. What is your view? More time on the yacht or in the tent with his baby?

 

[Akagi]

The thing I dont understand is why its hard to believe. Its a giant glamping tent, not some little two man crawl in tent you leave behind at a festival show ground. Google "glamping tent interiors" or similar.

I'd very much enjoy a stay in one myself

 

[robfosters]

WHO THE **** GIVES A ****!!!!!