- Joined
- 31 May 2009
- Posts
- 21,457
Coalition of Chaos sounds cool, yes please Korne and Nurgle
I see a dark future for us all, under the coalition of chaos!
A glorious, dark, doom ridden future.
Poll: Poll: Prime Minister Theresa May calls General Election on June 8th
- Thread starter Destination
- Start date
- Status
Coalition of Chaos sounds cool, yes please Korne and Nurgle
I see a dark future for us all, under the coalition of chaos!
A glorious, dark, doom ridden future.
Are you saying the NHS is in a healthy state under the tories?
no and it probably wouldn't be under the alternative either
what I'm saying, which I thought I'd made clear earlier, is that you don't need to sell your house to have an operation under the NHS and there doesn't seem to be any future plans for this to be the case either... which is why I asked you to clarify what you were referring to
Just lol at the Tory directive to try and get "coalition of chaos" tag line in to every TV interview. Its actually at a point now where most answers are little more than "yeah, yeah well at least we aren't as bad as a coalition of chaos"
Thought you didn't like hyperbole?
Permabanned
- Joined
- 23 Apr 2014
- Posts
- 23,552
- Location
- Hertfordshire
Actual facts and polices are irrelevant these days.
'coalition of chaos' is just a catch phrase
it isn't making a exaggerated claim as you were with re: selling a house to pay for an operation
the important distinction is that it's true - labour under Corbyn is chaotic already. As for a coalition under Corbyn: 'coalition of chaos' is an apt description
Labour under anything else is what I would phrase, mentally challenged. Not that the Momentum lot aren't equally as dumb, this idea that coalitions are bad are we now have this politically retarded society.
Also a General election right after a Council election, a year after a massive referendum where the leader of the party flips his **** and leaves and two years after another General election isn't itself chaotic? Alongside "forgetting" they're own manifesto and attempting to **** out a tax isnt chaotic?
Also a General election right after a Council election, a year after a massive referendum where the leader of the party flips his **** and leaves and two years after another General election isn't itself chaotic? Alongside "forgetting" they're own manifesto and attempting to **** out a tax isnt chaotic?
Soldato
- Joined
- 22 Feb 2010
- Posts
- 5,214
- Location
- Southampton
Apart from that it's a load of balls made up to scare people out of voting anything other than tory
Lib Dems said no to labour coalition
Snp said no to labour coalition
Not much left for the coalition of made up hyperbole
There is no coalition under a labour govt, ok you can have 1 green MP, see how much that helps bump the numbers up
Lib Dems said no to labour coalition
Snp said no to labour coalition
Not much left for the coalition of made up hyperbole
There is no coalition under a labour govt, ok you can have 1 green MP, see how much that helps bump the numbers up
Last edited:
It is funny to see that nobody wants a coalition with Labour, yet Surrey Labour Party are considering not fielding a candidate in the interest of inter-party cooperation.
The wolves really are circling.
Surrey labour candidate would not get anywhere near getting the seat
I don't think anyone is objecting to coalitions in general - we've already seen one coalition work recently under Cameron
it is the idea of a coalition under a leader who can't even lead his own party let alone work with others that would be chaotic
The trouble with the NHS - and any form of UHC - is that you can always do more. You could spend the entire tax income on the NHS and still there could be more to be done. The question should be, "Are we doing enough?" Don't let the perfect get in the way of the good enough. Funnily enough, the American Right who oppose UHC fall for the same trap.
The NHS has been hit from 4 sides recently tough.
1) Increasing population
2) Increasing price of drugs
3) Collapse of social care causing bed blocking of operations
4) A decrease in real terms of funding/capita
And that's at the same time the government tries another costly reorganisation and takes the money from their budget to do it..
It seemed to work under Cameron though right?
Just cos they say no now, doesn't mean they won't say no if the General Election result enables a Labour-Lib-SNP coalition. Come on, you should know how politics and politicians work by now.
that was the point, yes
the issue being Corbyn 'leading' one not coalitions in general
- Status