Poll: Poll: UK General Election 2017 - Mk II

Who will you vote for?


  • Total voters
    1,453
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
somewhat missing the point - which was in reference to a first strike causing us to be wiped out too

dropping a bigger bomb still doesn't mean we necessarily get any incoming in return... rather it lowers the odds of that

Not missing the point at all. One our first strike birds are in the air we are finished as our enemies birds will have left their bays/subs/silo's minutes after ours our airborne. Nuclear war is a mugs game that no one wins.
 
Under what circumstances would the lowly UK be the first to decide it was time to push the button.

Who do some people think we are ?

It's a question based on pure fantasy. What would the rest of the world be doing while Jeremy was fretting over which code to enter?
 
Not missing the point at all. One our first strike birds are in the air we are finished as our enemies birds will have left their bays/subs/silo's minutes after ours our airborne. Nuclear war is a mugs game that no one wins.

everyone seems to be assuming a Russian enemy here...
 
Under what circumstances would the lowly UK be the first to decide it was time to push the button.

Who do some people think we are ?

It's a question based on pure fantasy. What would the rest of the world be doing while Jeremy was fretting over which code to enter?

We arent ever going to be first to the button
 
I'm sure those people working for those companies (and paying tax) arent complaining their government attracted lots of skilled jobs. What you lose in one hand you gain in another


So because we gain one grain of rice in one hand we don't need to worry about the hundreds slipping through the fingers of our other hand?

The employment brought and the subsequent taxes attached to those earnings in no way balance out the income lost from tax avoidance.

It is not balanced in any way shape or form, how can people simply refuse to see this.
 
We arent ever going to be first to the button

The whole point of it is the weight hanging overhead if it ever comes to actually using it the system has failed.

I think people significantly underestimate just how much nuclear weapons have actually driven the relative peace and stability we have enjoyed in this country for the past few decades.
 
Stay in
I am a Tory voter, but will admit Corbyn spoke well and answered more coherently than May. He always does. Some of the questions asked of him were also not at all relevant (IRA).

However, May did seem to get more of a gilling and it did, to me, seem to be a slightly left audience again.

The country is. Just too ******* lazy to vote half time.
 
The rule is even if your not willing to press the button you still damn well say you will.

Jeremy Corbyn is not fit for this purpose.
You also don't enter negotiations by preliminary saying you will be sure to accept any deal. Just stupid tactics.

Corbyn and labour are too weak in this unstable world.

 
The rule is even if your not willing to press the button you still damn well say you will.

indeed - though Russia is hardly the only country we need worry about in this case... obviously it is game over if we ever got into it with them yet that is what people seem to have blindly focused upon when the question of a first strike is posed... completely neglecting North Korea, Iran(in future) etc..

it is, as mentioned before, very unlikely however it isn't impossible that there could be some scenario where it is warranted
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom