Soldato
- Joined
- 20 Jun 2004
- Posts
- 5,936
- Location
- Essex
I don't get your point... every review says it's a better car in every way yet simply doesn't sound as good.
I don't get your point... every review says it's a better car in every way yet simply doesn't sound as good.
I don't get your point... every review says it's a better car in every way yet simply doesn't sound as good.
Which is similar to the 993 to 996 move, wah wah watercooling, then all forgotten.
Anyone driven or owned a Panamera Turbo S? Considering one.
The engine creates the drama as its builds to a crescendo and it's one of the main things for buying a sport car as its one of tha main factors why I purchased mine. However, a dull souless engine doesn't want to make get up and drive the car no matter how well it handles.
The engine would be fine in a normal car but not a sports car.
Which is similar to the 993 to 996 move, wah wah watercooling, then all forgotten.
[TW]Fox;29786562 said:I'd say the comparative values of each car suggest it very much wasn't all forgotten.
Lol, it's a slightly worse sounding engine, it's a bit much claiming it's dull and soulless!
The old flat 6 is hardly amazing, it sounds like a bag of spanners at low revs and is comparatively lethargic compared to the turbo 4.
[TW]Fox;29786562 said:I'd say the comparative values of each car suggest it very much wasn't all forgotten.
Lol, it's a slightly worse sounding engine, it's a bit much claiming it's dull and soulless!
The old flat 6 is hardly amazing, it sounds like a bag of spanners at low revs and is comparatively lethargic compared to the turbo 4.
But same could be said for 964s up until about 2 years ago.
Lol, it's a slightly worse sounding engine, it's a bit much claiming it's dull and soulless!
The old flat 6 is hardly amazing, it sounds like a bag of spanners at low revs and is comparatively lethargic compared to the turbo 4.
Whilst the dream is to own a 911, I wonder if the 981 boxster is actually a much better proposal for owning a convertible Porsche before I have children! Although no option for child seat fitment...
How many flat 6 Porsches have you owned?
Never heard so much nonsense posted.
I owned a 997.1 C2S with the 3800cc engine with PSE and the car sounded amazing at any rpm, it got a lot of attention for the noise it made at idle, low revs and full chat because it sounded very good.
It was also never lethargic, throttle response in sports mode was superb and it would get up and go from any rpm and pulled hard to the 7500rpm limit.
Apart from the reliability issues of the the gen1 they go and sound awesome, of course I am speaking from an ownership experience of nearly five years and having driven all the other flat 6 engines Porsche had to go offer also and none of them matched your description.
I disagree gibbo the 911 engines don't sound great at idle and just above. However lethargic is definitely not true.
For me a car is heavily about how good the engine sounds and how it makes power and throttle response, but noise is a big importance. End of the day if noise was not important everyone would buy Ecoboost Mustangs, but they don't because those one sound completely crap like pretty much all 4 cylinder turbocharged cars do. For me the engine makes a car and it can make some cars truly great.