Conjecture is what forums are made for, what else are we meant to do between new hardware launches 
Some of you take it way to seriously
Some of you take it way to seriously
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Possible Radeon 390X / 390 and 380X Spec / Benchmark (do not hotlink images!!!!!!)
- Thread starter Boomstick777
- Start date
- Status
Caporegime
she knows
Predicted GM200 VS Fiji XT Benchmarks:
Both are beasts ! Within punching distance of each other at least in the hypothetical
Translated > https://translate.google.com/transl...p://udteam.tistory.com/688&edit-text=&act=url
Both are beasts ! Within punching distance of each other at least in the hypothetical
Translated > https://translate.google.com/transl...p://udteam.tistory.com/688&edit-text=&act=url
Yeah few people said AMD had another high end card waiting to launch, wasn't there going to be a 285X as well. Maybe Maxwell could have altered AMD plans..
Pretty sure both new high end cards are gonna awesome.
Caporegime
what else are we meant to do between new hardware launches
Argue about which 5% is faster?
Caporegime
Predicted GM200 VS Fiji XT Benchmarks:
Both are beasts ! Within punching distance of each other at least in the hypothetical
Translated > https://translate.google.com/transl...p://udteam.tistory.com/688&edit-text=&act=url
With 40% more SP's alone i would expect it to be at least 20% better than the 290X, with HBM it should be 30 to 50%
Argue about which 5% is faster?
Lol
Yeah looking forward to getting some info that we know is legit. HBM and all them shaders should be really good GPU performance. Interested to see if upcoming APU's get HBM as well, would give them a massive boost in performance, 4 CPU cores, 2GB HBM on chip and 768 shaders would be beast.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 30,718
Everyone's gonna be devastated if AMD's next line-up is 28nm-based and no HBM
Caporegime
Everyone's gonna be devastated if AMD's next line-up is 28nm-based and no HBM
I am still waiting for a sub £200 GTX960 and R9 380X.
Soldato
- Joined
- 27 Feb 2012
- Posts
- 6,586
What does HBM supposed to do? Does it only increase the bandwidth, the thing we don't currently saturate.
Caporegime
I think it might also help with power consumption too?? Not sure about that one.
However. funnily enough despite Hawaii having 40% more shaders than Tahiti,and the GK110 having 88% more shaders than the GK104,performance does scale that well. I do wonder if bandwidth considerations are an issue too???
Yeah reduction in power consumption and big jump in bandwidth. All good things..
Caporegime
Traditionally if you over clock your Card you get 0.6 from the GPU and 0.3 From the VRam.
So a 10% overclock on the core = 6% and 10% overclock on the VRam = 3%
So in theory if you add 40% more shaders you get about 25%, add 80% more memory bandwidth and get another 20%, totalling 45%
So a 10% overclock on the core = 6% and 10% overclock on the VRam = 3%
So in theory if you add 40% more shaders you get about 25%, add 80% more memory bandwidth and get another 20%, totalling 45%
Did you just pull this out of your ass? Btw, 0.6 would be 60% while 0.3 would be 30% lol
Last edited:
Associate
- Joined
- 13 Oct 2013
- Posts
- 171
Reread his post, he stated a 10% overclock, not a 100% overclock.
Associate
- Joined
- 13 Oct 2013
- Posts
- 171
Does it? I took it you get a 90% improvement if you overclock by 100% theoretically, so a 10% overclock is 6% and 3%, not particularly confusing.
- Status