Man of Honour
Underclocking memory barely makes any difference now.
And again, that won't really show it making any actual difference
It will on the Heaven 4 bench and more importantly you can do the same to GDDR5 cards.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Possible Radeon 390X / 390 and 380X Spec / Benchmark (do not hotlink images!!!!!!)
- Thread starter Boomstick777
- Start date
- Status
It will on the Heaven 4 bench and more importantly you can do the same to GDDR5 cards.
Caporegime
The hoses are the same as the ones on my CoolerMaster CPU cooler.
*EDIT: this is what I mean about the rivet position giving it away:
Ah yes the rivet does look more like a 120 than 240, good point.
Caporegime
I meant the way the hoses are positioned but maybe they use the same hoses.
Caporegime
If that's to be believed, they've created a parity card, at least in that synthetic.
Soldato
videocardz be making **** up.
Caporegime
Whycry has got many things right before, so I am inclined to put a bit of faith in that.
Soldato
Mate if those pics are legit AMD have a whole entire market all to themselves. If they really have made a card as powerful or better than Titan X on a board that size it will sell by the bucket load. Up until now those who have gone full ITX (as in the real one, not an enormous pretender like the Corsair 250D) then this will be the only top end GPU to come in that size.
Up until now real ITX owners have only had a choice of the 970 from Nvidia or a 285 Radeon from AMD. Couple this Nano version with that new X99 ITX board from Asrock and a 5960x and the power per square inch will be absolutely and utterly mind blowing.
Man of Honour
I will not be impressed if that is the best the Fiji cards can do
These benches are traditionally strong for AMD so it may not look so good on the Unigine benches.
Soldato
I misread this, I thought it was normal firestrike, I was thinking my 290x gets 13,000 on that, thats a crap card! Oops
Soldato
im sure you'll be impressed if the cards come in under £600 Kaap..this is key now, the price point.
Caporegime
The only time they have ever got anything right was when they have information released by proper channels.
AMD were tight lipped about the 290X and their speculations on that were way out.
This is one of their speculations given that AMD have not yet released performance figures.
Man of Honour
By chance I ran Firestrike Extreme on a pair of oced TX and a 5960X this morning and here is what I got.
The TXs are beasts at overclocking, as you can see it is a long way away from the stock scores.
The TXs are beasts at overclocking, as you can see it is a long way away from the stock scores.
It sounds like he's had different information, coming in from different sources, and he's just bunged it all into a chart. He even says he's 'done his best' to make sure all the benches were taken using the same CPU. Ergo: they weren't.
Soldato
AMD with similar 980ti performance and less memory will have to slot in below the ti price wise, say $599. If legit, it's disappointing.
If that's right it's worrying, it gives Nvidia a lot of room to maneuver, they could drop prices or they could launch a 6GB version of the TX which would still have 50% more VRAM than fury and probably OC better than regular TX.
Man of Honour
I will take performance please.
Having said that what AMD need is for the Fiji cards to compete against the 980 Ti on price and performance.
Caporegime
Don't worry, they have yet to get anything right RE: AMD prerelease, it looks like they cobbled this together from fudzela crap.
- Status