Possible Radeon 390X / 390 and 380X Spec / Benchmark (do not hotlink images!!!!!!)

Mtom · 12 Jun 2015 at 09:38

CAT-THE-FIFTH said:
Custom cooled Fuji card:

http://semiaccurate.com/2015/06/11/powercolor-shows-hybrid-future-gpu-card/

It appears to be a Powercolor card with a hybrid cooler.

If that is a DVI port, then its not a Fiji

sprite1275 · 12 Jun 2015 at 09:49

fs123 said:
I think it'll be braided. The videocardz site shows two different pics..one where it's braided and another just standard. Standard must be a review version.

http://videocardz.com/56236/amd-radeon-fury-x-pictured-some-more

Hope the back plates are jazzed up a bit for retail.

chaosophy · 12 Jun 2015 at 09:55

TheRealDeal said:
Is this the active users from steam or active users who participated in the survey?

(Thankfully) The thread's moved on but just to reply. It was from the last active Steam users announcement I could find and it just happened to fit the final total they came up with - didn't bother checking all the individual card percentages.

But as stated - and discussed since - there are so many issues with trying to extrapolate the stats that way.

------

Anyway.. getting close now ! Good to see some more relevant info in this thread, even if it is only a few leaked pics.

Next week should be good. E3 in general, some (hopefully) decent PC focus this year and the poop storm that this forum will be what ever AMD end up releasing.

pandem0nium · 12 Jun 2015 at 09:58

Mtom said:
If that is a DVI port, then its not a Fiji

This looks like the earlier posted Powercolor hybrid prototype cooler on a 290x.

fs123 · 12 Jun 2015 at 10:02

pandem0nium said:
This looks like the earlier posted Powercolor hybrid prototype cooler on a 290x.

It's damn ugly anyway with the fan angled like that. Good thing it's only a prototype.

theor14 · 12 Jun 2015 at 10:06

fs123 said:
It's damn ugly anyway with the fan angled like that. Good thing it's only a prototype.

I agree, I prefer simple and clean to transformer when it comes to PC parts.

CAT-THE-FIFTH · 12 Jun 2015 at 10:17

Thanks for the clarification everyone.

ubersonic · 12 Jun 2015 at 10:18

The fans angled so it works better.

TwsT · 12 Jun 2015 at 10:19

nearly 8000 posts before launch I reckon we will get OVER 9000

Baboonanza · 12 Jun 2015 at 10:29

I hate to break it to you but the average posts per day to this thread is only(!) 36.77 (7869/214, excluding today).

Unless this thread goes absolutely mental in the next 4 days we will only just break 8000.

TwsT · 12 Jun 2015 at 10:30

So what we need is some decent rumours to get gregster going

chaosophy · 12 Jun 2015 at 10:32

What about view count? Reckon it can hit half a mill ?

theor14 · 12 Jun 2015 at 10:34

Something will pop up with only 4 days left surely.

Perfect_Chaos · 12 Jun 2015 at 10:34

TwsT said:
nearly 8000 posts before launch I reckon we will get OVER 9000

What, 9000?! There's no way that can be right, can it?

stulid · 12 Jun 2015 at 10:35

Perfect_Chaos said:
What, 9000?! There's no way that can be right, can it?

It is, I passed that ages ago.

Owenb · 12 Jun 2015 at 10:41

Baboonanza said:
I hate to break it to you but the average posts per day to this thread is only(!) 36.77 (7869/214, excluding today).

Unless this thread goes absolutely mental in the next 4 days we will only just break 8000.

The thread has been 'mental' for a while now. In the last 4 days there has been ~1300 posts.

Dis86 · 12 Jun 2015 at 10:49

stulid said:
It is, I passed that ages ago.

It's true. Stulid is over 9000.

Besty · 12 Jun 2015 at 10:52

Fury X is 54% quicker than 290X with just a 10% heat bump. That seems to tally with the leaked Firestrike bench which has it trading blows with the TX.

Assuming that is correct, if they can launch the Fury X at £599inc then happy days.

I am keen to see what HBM brings to 1080p, in theory some of the benches should rocket simply because of the extra bandwidth making 1080p@144fps within reach.

Even if the 390X is just a 290X re-brand with a TDP drop, it will still be as quick as a 980 and beat it in a far few benches due to the 8GB Vram. AMDMatt's 290X cards held their own against the 980, even my reference 980s which are tricked out so don't understand the '9 months unanswered' comment from earlier as the 290X was only really beaten up once thermals were considered. In terms of cost and straight-line speed the 290X was solid.

ubersonic · 12 Jun 2015 at 10:53

Owenb said:
The thread has been 'mental' for a while now. In the last 4 days there has been ~1300 posts.

And like six confirmed facts XD

andybird123 · 12 Jun 2015 at 10:57

Besty said:
Fury X is 54% quicker than 290X with just a 10% heat bump. That seems to tally with the leaked Firestrike bench which has it trading blows with the TX.

Assuming that is correct, if they can launch the Fury X at £599inc then happy days.

I am keen to see what HBM brings to 1080p, in theory some of the benches should rocket simply because of the extra bandwidth making 1080p@144fps within reach.

Even if the 390X is just a 290X re-brand with a TDP drop, it will still be as quick as a 980 and beat it in a far few benches due to the 8GB Vram. AMDMatt's 290X cards held their own against the 980, even my reference 980s which are tricked out so don't understand the '9 months unanswered' comment from earlier as the 290X was only really beaten up once thermals were considered. In terms of cost and straight-line speed the 290X was solid.

So if it trades blows with a 980ti but has less vram and is more expensive, then that is good?