- Joined
- 2 Jan 2012
- Posts
- 12,224
- Location
- UK.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Possible Radeon 390X / 390 and 380X Spec / Benchmark (do not hotlink images!!!!!!)
- Thread starter Boomstick777
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- 2 Jan 2012
- Posts
- 12,224
- Location
- UK.
If the price is good, I will get one but need to save some pennies first, as I am poor
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Posts
- 30,290
- Location
- Dormanstown.
I'm in the market for AMD card with 40% better performance than a 290X.
But it all depends how AMD end up messing it up
I'm debating on buying the fury but not the 4gb model, will be waiting for 8gb instead depending on price and performance obviously lol. Otherwise 980ti it will be!
Also @ greg sorry couldn't resist
I definitely won't be. In fact the only reason I've been posting in this thread is because I'm GPUless (thanks to OCUK and EVGA).
But now that I have been posting I'll follow the aftermath of the release. The build up has been so long that it's quite exciting to see what happens.
If the Fury had more than 4 GB VRAM I would have seriously considered it as a single GPU solution. Though it would also have to be noticeably faster than the Titan X.
Soldato
- Joined
- 14 Feb 2011
- Posts
- 7,490
If the price is good, I will get one but need to save some pennies first, as I am poor
Then borrow some ram from the Titan X
You don't need the whole 12 Gig.
Possibly me. It all depends on the performance and price. Plus how the release may affect the price of all the other cards. Definitely want a new card before the end of July though!
Associate
- Joined
- 29 Sep 2003
- Posts
- 593
- Location
- Stoke-on-Trent
I would get one depending on the price/performance compared to a 980Ti (not sure i could stomach TX price, as much as i want one)
gpus only come in twos for me , so they need to display a major overhaul in multi GPU support , needs to be as fast as a 980ti and a good 50-75 quid cheaper and I'll be first to drop an order . Saying this I need to know that 4gb HBM is going to be used differently as it just isn't enough
I desperately want a new card and a new monitor to step up to 1440p, so this is pencilled in on the list. Just waiting to see how it all pans out tbh.
- Joined
- 2 Jan 2012
- Posts
- 12,224
- Location
- UK.
Going to be interesting seeing how these stack up. 6GB/12GB's of GDDR5 vs a lesser amount of HBM at possibly twice the speed.
Is more always better? I mean would you pick a 4GB DDR3 card over a 2GB GDDR5 card? Because moarz ram ! Doubtful.
I am wandering if it will mean stutter when going from GPU to system but I'll hold judgement until you know we actually see the performance. HBM is an unknown quantity atm.
Only 3 days to go.
Is more always better? I mean would you pick a 4GB DDR3 card over a 2GB GDDR5 card? Because moarz ram ! Doubtful.
I am wandering if it will mean stutter when going from GPU to system but I'll hold judgement until you know we actually see the performance. HBM is an unknown quantity atm.
Only 3 days to go.
This is the big question, and the benchmarks will give us the answer. I suspect it will perform FAR better than people suspect though... more is certainly not always better. We'll just have to see what difference HBM makes.
You can't be that emphatic without seeing benchmarks surely? Would you ignore the Fury X if it came in cheaper than the 980Ti and trounced it (or equalled it) in all benchmarks... simply because the 980Ti has 2GB extra RAM?? That would make zero sense.
I'm eagerly waiting to see what happens with the benchmarks... should prove VERY interesting.
- Status