• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Possible Radeon 390X / 390 and 380X Spec / Benchmark (do not hotlink images!!!!!!)

Status
Not open for further replies.
waspy88 said:
Fury is priced so well.. annoyed I invested in a G-Sync monitor now :P

Might get that mini thing with two GPUs so I can have everything
Click to expand...

Same price as the 980TI in the US, no UK price released yet. Looks to be similar performance for the same price, so i don't see why you should be annoyed.
 
mmj_uk said:
AMD haven't made a real improvement though, going by the presentation they're just shutting down parts of the GPU when it's able to be shut down (ie when you have v-sync on), if you need all the frames the card is capable of like at 4K it's probably still going to pull a huge amount of power, hence the AIO cooler.
Click to expand...

Your misinformed.. Shutting down parts of the core when not needed is not what causes the higher performance per watt.. they are 2 separate things. The cards will be able to perform 1.5 times faster per watt when going full tilt.. 2 times for the nano. Thats pretty well done on AMDs part. Give credit were credit is due friend.
 
RavenXXX2 said:
AMD say it's the fasted GPU on the planet, I would say it's a safe bet the TX is beat.

I love the fact they are actively encouraging overclocking and apparently the fury is a beast at it.
Click to expand...

If the Fury X beats the Titan X and comes in at under 980 Ti prices, Nvidia are in serious trouble.
 
the guy after annoyed me too hard to stick around for the giveaway lol

yeh i like the look of nano too
& huddy did good <3
 
I'm particularly interested in the possible application of HBM to an APU.

Could make them a rather attractive proposition if it's feasible.
 
LoadsaMoney said:
Im still stunned here! :D

Loving that new ref design, and what happened to Fury being a higher tier card, higher price ? :p
Click to expand...

Me too. The whole thing turned out better than my best expectations.

Now I fancy buying a Fury X ffs. lol. But I will be strong and wait until 16nm (I think) :D
 
Phixsator said:
Your misinformed.. Shutting down parts of the core when not needed is not what causes the higher performance per watt.. they are 2 separate things. The cards will be able to perform 1.5 times faster per watt when going full tilt.. 2 times for the nano. Thats pretty well done on AMDs part. Give credit were credit is due friend.
Click to expand...

Him give credit? :eek:
 
Best info for release dates I can find Quote:

"A new family of the world's first HBM-powered GPUs - The AMD
Radeon(TM) R9 Fury X, which is the world's first HBM-powered
graphics card (previously codenamed "Fiji"), is scheduled for
availability starting June 24th. The AMD Radeon R9 Fury, with both
liquid- and air-cooled options, is slated for availability starting
July 14th. The deceptively small (6" in length), category-creating AMD
Radeon R9 Nano is scheduled to follow in Q3 2015. AMD also plans to
bring to market this fall a flagship Radeon Fury product for very
smooth 4K gaming and VR that is based on two "Fiji" GPUs."
 
Let's hope it lands for under £550 and outperforms the 980ti. The equivalent 980ti is the EVGA Hybrid at £650. Add in an overpriced gsync monitor and it'll be over £200 cheaper to go with an AMD product. I'd prefer an 8Gb card, but I prefer fps to AA, so as new games come out I'd happily cut out the AA (and VRAM usage) to boost the frames.
 
I think reviews will only come out once these are available at retail. AMD didn't seem to send their cards to reviewers so they'll have to get a hold of one themselves.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom