Soldato
I very much doubt between them you would notice any difference, a difference worth £400+
Now the jump from 290x to 980ti is massive and something you would notice.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Possible Radeon 390X / 390 and 380X Spec / Benchmark (do not hotlink images!!!!!!)
- Thread starter Boomstick777
- Start date
- Status
I very much doubt between them you would notice any difference, a difference worth £400+
Now the jump from 290x to 980ti is massive and something you would notice.
Edit - misread what you said. I'd assume pre-orders will go up soonish.
Last edited:
Caporegime
Probably not, even after launch a lot of the 980ti models are still preorder.
Associate
I'd be a bit miffed if I had ordered a 980ti two weeks ago and was still waiting for it now. To watch these reveals so shortly after must make people question purchases.
In Vulkan and DX12 the extra features and vastly more parallel architecture that is GCN won't go un-used, unlike old DX.
am guessing samples are being sent today to reviewers, for them to be ready for the 24th
If its 1.5X the performance of a 290X, then looking at benchmarks and doing the maths.
It sits in between the 980 and titan x, on some games but matches and beats the titan in others.
Example from guru 3d used 4gb version of R290
Hitman Absolution @ 2560x1444
Titan x 98fps
R290 x 67/2 = 33.5+67 = 100fps
Metro last light same rez
Titan X 72fps
R290 x 50fps same maths comes out at 75fps
Looking at the numbers the Fury X beats the titan @ 2560x1444 by a small fraction.
It sits in between the 980 and titan x, on some games but matches and beats the titan in others.
Example from guru 3d used 4gb version of R290
Hitman Absolution @ 2560x1444
Titan x 98fps
R290 x 67/2 = 33.5+67 = 100fps
Metro last light same rez
Titan X 72fps
R290 x 50fps same maths comes out at 75fps
Looking at the numbers the Fury X beats the titan @ 2560x1444 by a small fraction.
Indeed. The Nano looks quite cool. Depends on what it is priced at though.
Nvidia enjoyed a record breaking 980 release and a year of increased sales leading to record market share and record profits.
That is a pretty good strategy. AMD likely has around 8 months to sell Fury before Pascal turns up.Soemthing tells me they wont make as much profit as Nvidia int his round.
Caporegime
Nvidia is green which means a 300W Nvidia card is ECO-Friendly but since AMD is red,it means a 300W AMD card kills all the bunny rabbits and kittens and destroys the world.
Caporegime
The one I've ordered isn't in stock until early July, (eta). Tbh it would have been nice to see AMD benchmarks. But after this presentation, were still as much in the dark about how theese cards will perform as we were yesterday.
Indeed. I will definitely be holding on to my 980 until the die shrink now. I suspect these big powerful 28nm will look silly once Pascal is released.
Looking at the numbers the Fury X beats the titan @ 2560x1444 by a small fraction.
But you won't be able to fry your breakfast on the Fury X, nor dry your hair with it.
Soldato
Depends if Bitcoin kicks off again and AMD have another record year XD
Probably, but the difference is more like £200 if you buy wisely / compare the prices. 12GB of vram will no doubt keep the X relevant longer than it's lilttle brother.
- Status