• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Possible Radeon 390X / 390 and 380X Spec / Benchmark (do not hotlink images!!!!!!)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Exactly, and tbh most people don't even use 4k at the mo let alone 5k and by the time 4k becomes more common we will be on to HBM2 anyhow, so really if those leaked benches are infact anything like a real indication then the FuryX will be special.

I'm tempted to hold out for the x2 version, however pending actual real game benchmarks that Fury-X looks potentially too good to not buy especially with a 1440p 144hz IPS panel from Asus to partner it with:)

Another thing, this could also breathe a lot more confidence into AMD, next year could be massive for them once they get the die shrink and HBM2 and could really smash it with Zen cpu's or HBM apu's etc

the X2 yes deffo, because that'll be great for next year at 4K.............but only at 4K............. twice as powerful as TX, bloody hell :eek:
 
The AMD Caribbean Islands Family: Not Just a Rebrand
While AMD’s Fury X provides a halo for the Radeon brand, AMD still has other new
graphics cards in the Radeon 300 series including the following air cooled cards:
 R9 390 & R9 390X each with 8GB of GDDR5 and 275W for 4K gaming
 R9 380 2 or 4GB of GDDR5 and 190W for 1440p gaming
 R7 370 up to 4GB of GDDR5 and 110W for everyday gaming
 R7 360 up to 2GB of GDDR5 and 100W for everyday gaming


AMD has been hard at work over the past year-and-a-half optimizing and re-architecting
the microcontrollers within the ASICs themselves. Combined with the improvements to
their manufacturing process, AMD has been able to squeeze more performance out of
each of their cards and increase performance while maintaining the same price tier as
its predecessor.

So much for rebrands.
 

AMD has been hard at work over the past year and a half optimizing and rearchitecting
the microcontrollers within the ASICs themselves. Combined with the
improvements to their manufacturing process, AMD has been able to squeeze more performance out of each of their cards and increase performance while
maintaining the same price tier as its predecessor.
 


Leaked benchmarks.

It's pretty much neck and neck with 980Ti at lower resolutions but then starts to tail off at the highest resolutions, AMD obviously haven't enabled the magical HBM memory doubling feature yet.

Also worth noting that FireStrike is just a simple benchmark scene and won't fill memory with lots of ****.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom