Possible Radeon 390X / 390 and 380X Spec / Benchmark (do not hotlink images!!!!!!)

TheRealDeal · 16 Jun 2015 at 20:23

snips86x said:
It looks amazing but they need to sort their drivers out.

As do Nvidia.

LoadsaMoney · 16 Jun 2015 at 20:23

I can't see any new drivers

billyturbo · 16 Jun 2015 at 20:24

shankly1985 said:
+1
So much rage..

Fury has brought out the fury in a few posters.

snips86x · 16 Jun 2015 at 20:24

TheRealDeal said:
As do Nvidia.

yeah! I still have issues with SLI but its far better than what I had to deal with before

Orangey · 16 Jun 2015 at 20:24

snips86x said:
It looks amazing but they need to sort their drivers out.

See above

shankly1985 · 16 Jun 2015 at 20:24

snips86x said:
It looks amazing but they need to sort their drivers out.

Honestly... Drivers are fine.. Couple crossfire profiles needed sure but the drivers are perfectly fine..

At the moment nvidia are having much more problems with black screen driver crashing, some users reporting sli stuttering even with Gsync..

Not defending amd here I agree crossfire needs some more work on getting games working.. Mind you it is only the odd couple.

But let's not pretend nvidia is Mr driver perfect..

They both need work and at the moment I would rather play then crash.

Silent_Scone · 16 Jun 2015 at 20:25

wunkley said:
Forgive me, but I can't keep up with all the hysteria.....Is "the fastest" card in fact just a dual X2 type with 2 'chips' on one pcb, right? So apart from being small and cute, it basically means that like all other X2 cards in history it's essentially crossfire, and will therefore rely on crossfire profiles for all new games and decent driver support?

Good luck with that....

Pretty much. Clever choice of words.

I'm hoping the regular X is slower than the TX at 4K or on par so I don't have to buy it

.

shankly1985 said:
Honestly... Drivers are fine.. Couple crossfire profiles needed sure but the drivers are perfectly fine..

At the moment nvidia are having much more problems with black screen driver crashing, some users reporting sli stuttering even with Gsync..

Not defending amd here I agree crossfire needs some more work on getting games working.. Mind you it is only the odd couple.

But let's not pretend nvidia is Mr driver perfect..

They both need work and at the moment I would rather play then crash.

The crashes aren't affecting everyone. Both machines in my house hold are racking up hours in Witcher 3 with no crashing at all at desktop or otherwise.

r7slayer · 16 Jun 2015 at 20:26

Kaapstad said:
Am I missing something ?

Single Fury X = 2 X 8 Pin power connectors

Dual Fury X = 2 X 8 Pin power connectors

They stacked the connectors too, its actually 16 pins per connector making it total of 32 pins

Firefox35 · 16 Jun 2015 at 20:27

shankly1985 said:
Honestly... Drivers are fine.. Couple crossfire profiles needed sure but the drivers are perfectly fine..

LMAO

FoxEye · 16 Jun 2015 at 20:27

I wonder if the 390X will end up faster than the Nano? Although the Nano will be more expensive (maybe 500$?) due to the small form factor...

snips86x · 16 Jun 2015 at 20:28

shankly1985 said:
Honestly... Drivers are fine.. Couple crossfire profiles needed sure but the drivers are perfectly fine..

At the moment nvidia are having much more problems with black screen driver crashing, some users reporting sli stuttering even with Gsync..

Not defending amd here I agree crossfire needs some more work on getting games working.. Mind you it is only the odd couple.

But let's not pretend nvidia is Mr driver perfect..

They both need work and at the moment I would rather play then crash.

Oh don't get me wrong, I've had my fair share of issues on both sides, but the issues I had with the 290 was an abomination. I'm not trying to start anything, just giving my opinion that the driver support was the reason I sold it

Squink · 16 Jun 2015 at 20:28

FoxEye said:
I wonder if the 390X will end up faster than the Nano? Although the Nano will be more expensive (maybe 500$?) due to the small form factor...

They said the Nano will be faster than the 390X in the presentation.

Silent_Scone · 16 Jun 2015 at 20:29

Firefox35 said:
LMAO

Reminded me of this

That's the earnings call from last year

FoxEye · 16 Jun 2015 at 20:29

mulpsmebeauty said:
They said the Nano will be faster than the 390X in the presentation.

Did they? They said a lot of contradictory things, tbh...

Gerard · 16 Jun 2015 at 20:30

Firefox35 said:
LMAO

Might want to check the nvidia driver issue thread since apparently everything is fine and dandy on that end.

Nutella33 · 16 Jun 2015 at 20:30

FoxEye said:
Did they? They said a lot of contradictory things, tbh...

more punch than the 290x was the quote. Great for the form factor though. laptops as well maybe?

r7slayer · 16 Jun 2015 at 20:30

Firefox35 said:
LMAO

did you post this in the nvidia thread too? You find that people that have issues hysterical? Well you're not a very nice person at all.

drunkenmaster · 16 Jun 2015 at 20:32

When will people get it, mmj is the single biggest Nvidia troll on the forums. He consistently posts inaccurate information, he goes around every Nvidia and AMD thread to post rubbish trashing AMD, in context or completely off topic. Greg is less of a troll than mmj... way less so.

Squink · 16 Jun 2015 at 20:32

FoxEye said:
Did they? They said a lot of contradictory things, tbh...

I imagine all of them would have been much more comfortable in the lab, so I'm not surprised the presentation was a bit stilted.

LoadsaMoney · 16 Jun 2015 at 20:32

Drivers are out, plus all cards mod.