• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Post Your 3DMark2K1/2K3 results here

Can I really have got 5639 in 3Dmark03 with only a 2500@3200 and 1Gb with a Sapphire 9800 Pro, and thats without really trying to overclock anything.... hopefully should be able to 5700 or 5800 with decent drivers and a pushing the ram and gpu a little
 
This system was built on a tight budget (Nov 2003) as I'm waiting for 939 AMD 64 and new Gen GFX cards.

20401 3DMark01

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7114906

and

6731 3DMark03

wow.jpg


Abit IC7 (£75 from the members market)
PIV 2.6 running @ 250 FSB (£95 from the members market)
1 GB Geil 4000 2.5 Cas running 1:1 (£180)
9800 Pro 450 Core 380 Mem (£250)
 
Last edited:
Originally posted by HugoFJH
Can I really have got 5639 in 3Dmark03 with only a 2500@3200 and 1Gb with a Sapphire 9800 Pro, and thats without really trying to overclock anything.... hopefully should be able to 5700 or 5800 with decent drivers and a pushing the ram and gpu a little
Click to expand...

I got 5962 with a non oc'd xp2800 with my rad9800 pro clocked up. I picked up around 400-500 points in o3 just by clocking that. So i reckon if you clock your rad you may even see 6000!
 
updates. 600 extra marks from tweaking ram and using Ati tool to find the max core and mem of my card. 21799
Just gotta sort out windows and gonna try some of those omega drivers. Should crack 22k in no time.Link
 
Last edited:
ok the tables are growing and growing and the lead has changed over the past couple of days for the 2001 Table but it seems the 2003 table is not changing at all.

I will would like to clarify what is acceptable:

1) Valid links that have been sent and published on Futuremark's website


what is not acceptable:

1) Screenshots will not be accepted
2) Just saying you have a score but can't submit it
 
Thought i just put a quick post to see if there any more people wanting to include their scores and also bring this thread back to page 1. it will be especially cool when the next gen cards can be included and these completely blitz the scores we already have.

Me i'm personally going to go with the X800 Pro/XT
 
Originally posted by davetherave2
ok the tables are growing and growing and the lead has changed over the past couple of days for the 2001 Table but it seems the 2003 table is not changing at all.

I will would like to clarify what is acceptable:

1) Valid links that have been sent and published on Futuremark's website


what is not acceptable:

1) Screenshots will not be accepted
2) Just saying you have a score but can't submit it
Click to expand...

it would appear 3Dk 2001 has trouble recognising or coming to terms with an Athlon64 CPU, as i cant publish most of my scores
 
Help!

Got an IC7 running at 255FSB, a 2.6P4 at 3.312Gig, 512 OCZ 4000Gold and a 9800Pro at ~400core.


Getting like 16K in 3dMark 01. What Gives?

Skidd.
 
Originally posted by Skiddley
Help!

Got an IC7 running at 255FSB, a 2.6P4 at 3.312Gig, 512 OCZ 4000Gold and a 9800Pro at ~400core.


Getting like 16K in 3dMark 01. What Gives?

Skidd.
Click to expand...


its a p4

/me hides ;)
 
Got me new Scores here :

2003 = 7029 . Not enough for top 10, but i am proud! :cool:

2001 = 22939

Just wait until i get a new x800xt...ha hah hah hah hah hah ha ha ha !;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom