Postman no delivery.... in any weather

The reality is that what you describe happens now, the "life-time doley" would be paying nothing basically now anyway.
You need to address the situation you used to (still do but to lesser extent) get where really well of people would keep "their" council house, often to try to pass that on, when they could and should have moved out as they no longer needed the cheap council support.

Every house now has different rates bar some; social, shared ownership would vary, private rent will vary, people with mortgages will vary etc.

Even now you have people holding on to council properties who don't live in them, they illegally sub let and make a bit extra.
If your on £150k as a solicitor I see absolutely no reason you need social housing. Paying say £500 a month, letting it for £1500 whilst living a nice life in a private flat elsewhere.
If it was linked to salary and that rent went from £500 to £2k a month they would certainly give it up if they could only get £1500 on the dodgy sub let.
This is rarer now due to the declining number but it does still happen.

Really its about targeting the social to those who need it most and at the point someone really doesn't need it, to encourage them to move on, freeing it up.
But if they insist on staying then at least they are paying a commercial level like everyone else.

But where do you draw the line of who can have a social housing property?

I mean my local authority told me a few years back now that because I earned (at the time) a shade over £24k that I needed to look at private rents because I earned too much for a council house. When I asked why there were council tenants earning significantly more than that on the street that I lived, some recently moved in, I couldn't get an answer. I'd gone to the council because I was being made to move out of the property I was in due to it being sold and private rents had increased to almost double for the area.

Sub-letting is a separate issue tbh. It's rife in certain areas of my town but the council don't bother investigating it despite it being pretty much public knowledge.
 
Apparently most rounds were increased in size last year, so to finish by contract finishing time, they have to prioritise parcels and rotate which sections of round doesn't get letters. Service has gone downhill massively since pandemic and the workload for posties is often impossible, while t&C's for posties has got so much worse since the strikes that ended last summer. We often get letters delivered that are postmarked 5-7 days ago.
 
Last edited:
Our postal mail has been reduced by 75%. Bank statements, insurance documents, utility statements (Severn Trent still send mine by post) are done online. Then with friends and family dying, fewer birthday cards and Christmas cards. Then most communication between people is text, WhatsApp, e-mail and phone.
 
Our usual postie is very good. He has delivered parcels to me when I am at work - his round includes my work. Then when my neighbour moved out a few months ago. She didn't bother doing redirection mail. I told him the address and he wrote it, popped the mail in the post box outside the delivery office. I'm not sure he's supposed to do this.
 
I hardly get any paper mail of value, but living in a small village there's only a few chaps that takes turns doing the rounds.

They try hard enough but normally if there's a lack of post, they will say it's one of the DCs further up the chain.

We didn't have mail for two weeks once, the told us that the DC before ours, all the staff had covid and the DC was closed for a week now there's a backlog.
I was thinking hows about telling the DC before them to send delivers straight to you rather than to one that's closed.
 
£39.510 and £25.000 for the two Peugeot EV models bought and you will be give or take + £0000000+ for livery, paint and fitout = Pretty much spot on.
Post bod = £16,000 to £25,000 with London showing £21,000 to £28,000.
Manager average = £47,975 per year
Ops manager = £35,000 to £50,000

Not sure where you got your figures @jpaul
 
It's a pain. I had a speeding notice dated the 12th of Jan telling me I needed to pay the fine or do a course by the 19th or I'd be taken to court. The letter arrived on the 21st...I booked the course anyway and am hoping the police are as ineffective as the royal mail.
 
Used to see our postie daily. Today I couldn't tell you the last time I saw ANY postie on their rounds.

Royal mail is done.

Horizon scandal, Tax dodging to the tune of over £100 million & now they want to reduce the service level?
Royal Mail and the Post Office are two separate organisations. Both incompetently run so it’s difficult to tell them apart but they are separate!
 
We had a letter yesterday as apparently there was an issue with our council tax payment going out this month (my wife had noticed it but she's not been well so hadn't chased them up and I'd forgotten about it :o) it was dated the 18th and gave us 7 days from that date to pay...so we got it just in time.

I'd take email over that any time.
 
We had a letter yesterday as apparently there was an issue with our council tax payment going out this month (my wife had noticed it but she's not been well so hadn't chased them up and I'd forgotten about it :o) it was dated the 18th and gave us 7 days from that date to pay...so we got it just in time.

I'd take email over that any time.
The same happened recently with hospital appointments that took over a week to travel 20miles and meant I could not visit (it was private, so easy to get another appointment) but not so if it was NHS...
After this I informed the hospital to stop all letters and do it only by email.

Times like these and with RM's poor performance, I can see more and more dropping their services tbh.
 
The idea that the postal service could be worse than it was 50 years ago is fascinating.

50 years ago there were barely any computers in the postal system, everything was sorted by hand, every address read by hand, no bar codes etc. Hugely labour intensive. Even the post vans themselves were far less efficient, used more fuel etc. And yet the postal service was cheap, effective and universal.

WHY hasn't 50 years of technicalogical progress, computerisation, logistics, efficiency resulted in a BETTER postal service?
 
The answer to that one is simple.

The government has encouraged the management of the postal service to go from running it as an actual service, with sufficient staff, to running it to make a profit (and syphon off every penny that could be), whilst cutting staffing to below the minimum required to ensure that they can cope with normal workloads, let alone anyone being off ill.
And like the worst workplaces, getting rid of "expensive" experienced staff and covering the gaps with "cheaper" or at least lower paid temps as often as possible (please ignore the agency that arranges them is getting paid more than it would cost to employ experienced staff directly), with the result that they are far less efficient.

And don't forget the number of times they've applied technology to make things worse, IIRC they were planning the likes of the routes based on a postman walking to the edge of the property, little or no allowance for the fact that the postman would have to deal with such things as garden gates, paths, waiting for someone to answer the door, or even that you can't walk at full speed whilst getting the post for the next address in your hand from the bag no matter how "efficiently" you've prepared them at the sorting office, or little things like the days they are having to deliver leaflets to every single door rather than post to say half the doors on their round.
 
£39.510 and £25.000 for the two Peugeot EV models bought and you will be give or take + £0000000+ for livery, paint and fitout = Pretty much spot on.
Post bod = £16,000 to £25,000 with London showing £21,000 to £28,000.
Manager average = £47,975 per year
Ops manager = £35,000 to £50,000

Not sure where you got your figures @jpaul

And you will find there are too many managers sat around twiddling their thumbs or even worse trying to justify their position by making stupid decisions.
 
Back
Top Bottom