Prince Andrew not served papers as they were handed to his police security.

Just me that is thinking she could have taken Epstein for so much more?

Probably so yes, especially if he was as rich as we're led to believe.

I'm not sure what she'll get from going after Andrew though, I can't see them paying out, his Royal duties are done either way so he's got nothing to lose by not paying her off and if she can't go after him due to the wording in the Epstein deal then I'm not sure what the point is, she's either going to get paid and go quiet until she runs out of money again or not get paid off and then interest will decrease over time anyway due to that being how the news and media interest goes...
 
I'm largely indifferent to her case now, as she was implicated in the Maxwell case of putting one of the victims in touch with Maxwell, telling her what to do and say to make money.
If she was a victim of grooming and manipulated into doing things she was made to believe were ok then we can't judge her at the time for encouraging others to do the things she did. To her, at the time, it was fine and appropriate. If we judge one of her actions we must judge them all with the same perspective.
 
But you are treating Prince Andrew and Epstein as if they were the same person... Andrew is not guilty of Epstein's crimes because they were friends, surely?

of course he’s equally guilty , we should tar everyone with the same brush


So as I pointed out earlier, this is just a thread to take the **** out of marginalised minority by picking awful people from that group to then give people the excuse to be transphobic to the whole minority. Cool. Thanks dowie.

Do you realise how disingenuous and pathetic it is you are quoting one example of someone, and then tarring a whole group of people with it is?

https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc...-policies-bathroom-safety-study-finds-n911106

or maybe we shouldn’t , I’m not sure now
 
of course he’s equally guilty , we should tar everyone with the same brush


or maybe we shouldn’t , I’m not sure now

lol if you can’t tell the difference between 2 people who openly associate and support each other and people who happen to share an attribute.
 
Zero chance, not a Royal, never. Eventually, once all these little games are over and goes far enough a payout will be offered, under the condition it's not an admission of guilt, with cast iron gag order so she will never speak of it again or risk getting sued to hell.

Then how long until she suffers an unfortunate accident?
 
of course he’s equally guilty , we should tar everyone with the same brush

or maybe we shouldn’t , I’m not sure now

Make your mind up, I picked Jimmy Savile up a couple of times at Euston Station back in the day, and took him to his London flat in Netherhall Gardens Hampstead, should I hand myself in to The Met or the N.Y.P.D?
 
Last edited:
Make your mind up, I picked Jimmy Savile up a couple of times at Euston Station back in the day, and took him to his London flat in Netherhall Gardens Hampstead, should I hand myself to The Met or the N.Y.P.D?

If you suspected him of being a kiddy fiddler, then yes, you should have.
 
If you suspected him of being a kiddy fiddler, then yes, you should have.

Have a word with yourself, I was a Black Cab driver, providing the job could pay what was on the hickory I could care less whether or not he robbed banks, evaded income tax, or was a hit man for the Mafia.
Plus if memory serves, rumours of Savile’s nefarious deeds surfaced in late 2012, I hung up my badge in February that year, so in the eighties and nineties he was just an ugly northern berk to me, with zero dress sense, who kept turning up on TV, and ran marathons from time to time.
 


That does my nut, americans get so many sayings arse about face. A favourite of mine is when someones going to try and do something like build a pc for instance and they say "lets see if we can't build this pc"...right.. so you're going to attempt to fail? Or even when they pronounce some words, like multiplayer in a game they make it a 3 part word and say "Mul-Tie-Player".
 

As much as I like David Mitchell and admire his humorous expounding on the rights and wrongs of expressing oneself correctly in English, I could care less what he or anyone thinks of my use of “I could care less.”
I know what I mean, everyone in the English speaking world knows what I mean, you know that it’s grammatically incorrect, I know that it’s grammatically incorrect, the difference is that I could care less that it’s grammatically incorrect.
Presumably you will counter that I’m being wilfully ignorant in using language that I know is grammatically incorrect.
I’ll see your counter and raise you that I’m using an alternative form of the phrase, although you don’t have to like it.
I’ve explained before at length why my way of using the phrase is acceptable, backed up by quoted treatises by international university professors of linguistics, I won’t bore everyone with them again.
Just Google “Could care less v Couldn’t care less”, you don’t have to accept what you read about it, but you might understand that I’m not using it to annoy you.
 
As much as I like David Mitchell and admire his humorous expounding on the rights and wrongs of expressing oneself correctly in English, I could care less what he or anyone thinks of my use of “I could care less.”
I know what I mean, everyone in the English speaking world knows what I mean, you know that it’s grammatically incorrect, I know that it’s grammatically incorrect, the difference is that I could care less that it’s grammatically incorrect.
Presumably you will counter that I’m being wilfully ignorant in using language that I know is grammatically incorrect.
I’ll see your counter and raise you that I’m using an alternative form of the phrase, although you don’t have to like it.
I’ve explained before at length why my way of using the phrase is acceptable, backed up by quoted treatises by international university professors of linguistics, I won’t bore everyone with them again.
Just Google “Could care less v Couldn’t care less”, you don’t have to accept what you read about it, but you might understand that I’m not using it to annoy you.

I do understand that you arent using it to annoy me, but this is the internet, so what either of us thinks the other one is on about, neither of us could care less lol
 
As much as I like David Mitchell and admire his humorous expounding on the rights and wrongs of expressing oneself correctly in English, I could care less what he or anyone thinks of my use of “I could care less.”
I know what I mean, everyone in the English speaking world knows what I mean, you know that it’s grammatically incorrect, I know that it’s grammatically incorrect, the difference is that I could care less that it’s grammatically incorrect.
Presumably you will counter that I’m being wilfully ignorant in using language that I know is grammatically incorrect.
I’ll see your counter and raise you that I’m using an alternative form of the phrase, although you don’t have to like it.
I’ve explained before at length why my way of using the phrase is acceptable, backed up by quoted treatises by international university professors of linguistics, I won’t bore everyone with them again.
Just Google “Could care less v Couldn’t care less”, you don’t have to accept what you read about it, but you might understand that I’m not using it to annoy you.
you should chill out and stop caring, life's too short
 
Back
Top Bottom