I demand pics of arknors outfit so we may judge his motivations!
Rachel Riley - political commentator.
- Thread starter h4rm0ny
- Start date
I demand pics of arknors outfit so we may judge his motivations!
No it was for her wit and her ability to complete primary school mathematical problems at speed compared to the average voter.
Her role outside of her TV show job is for her opinions though as a "market influencer " as they are known due to the public perception of her based on her 5v and social media presence .
What are your qualifications to post on politics on ti's social site?
doesn't stop it from looking absolutely ridiculous, she wore that to court ? I assume the pic is of her leaving
these are probably the same women who were happy to get rid of glamour models, grid girls etc because it's sexist but then get the great big baps out to stay relevant.
Because this is what you're saying should happen to these women.
The only difference is people take their opinions seriously and as newsworthy.
Imagine you were famous for whatever arbitrary reason, let's say for the size of your ****, how would you feel or care about some random person on the Internet saying you shouldn't speak about politics?
Would you think "of course they're right I'm listened to because of something other than a political science degree I should say nothing" or would you think "I can say what I want it's not my fault people listen to me and not you"?
Amazing the lengths someone will go to to act willfully blind
Stop this stuff please. It's ******* weird.
So just to be clear here arknor you are annoyed a pregnant woman hoisted her dress belt over her baby bump rather than tying it over her inflated womb?
Also you are annoyed that a woman while pregnant has grown "great big baps" ready to feed her child?
Female biology is somthing alien to you isn't it?
was that the only clean item of clothing available? or was it a choice to look that ridiculous ?
was it a court photo? it's not a very respectable look honestly is it?
Caporegime
- Joined
- 20 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 75,926
- Location
- Wish i was in a Ramen Shop Counter
Who made you the fashion police?
It's a 1 piece dress that is covered from the neck down to the knee? with not breaks to see any skin in between. I am showing more skin now in my T-shirt and PJ bottoms.
What are you suggesting? only woolly jumpers are allowed when you are a woman?
It's a 1 piece dress that is covered from the neck down to the knee? with not breaks to see any skin in between. I am showing more skin now in my T-shirt and PJ bottoms.
What are you suggesting? only woolly jumpers are allowed when you are a woman?
It's a pretty standard dress.
I admit I've never been pregant but I assume comfortable adjustable clothing is imperative to comfort.
I'll wager its a sensible design house unless you can find otherwise too.
But again you're critiquing the dress sense of a pregnant woman after complaining about her "great big baps".
That is beyond ridiculous. I dare you to go say that sentence to any woman you didn't come out of while showing that picture in context of pregnancy and not have them remove you from thier life
no idea... this is the pic I'm talking about btw...
drawn a black line where like a belt or whatever would usually be surely
not sure if trying to make legs look longer or make sure the only thing you notice is her boobs.
I thought she was known for her IQ I bet in reality her and carol are dumb as a brick and someone was telling them in an earpeice the answers
Or trying to avoid crushing her baby
Completely agree. Even the judge remarked to Murray it was the way she replied rather than what she said. Similarly it was the manner of Riley's tweet that won the case. One was implied, the other direct.
I've noticed more and more that rational posts on here get ignored or slated. Then 2 pages of Rileys clothing and physique?
This thread got weird
So everyone who gets an egg thrown at them is a nazi?or are you saying that if you don't want eggs thrown at you don't be a nazi is bad advice?
Was Owen suggesting that Prescott was a nazi?
Well, yes. That's exactly what I'm saying she said.
So Owen needs to be sued for calling corbyn and Prescot a nazi?
Or schwarzenegger nazi too? (Oof that's gonna be a discrimination case)
He was saying it about the BNP guy. That's why context and timing is relevant. Don't be obtuse, this bad faith arguing is tiresome
I 100% agree with you he deserves to be fined for implying somone is a nazi.
And as she has been officially legally cleared of saying corbyn is a nazi you will not argue in bad faith that's what she did will you?
Or will you be tiresome?
Or perhaps you'll jump on the pregant woman body shaming trend .
We can only wait and see*
*not to be obtuse but I'm implying that you like the other people on your side of this hold bizarre and controversial opinions about women and their rights as q satirical device, sue me