Don
Well I think we’ll just need to disagree about that one!Agreed, but a background figure depicted as white blonde woman.
Well I think we’ll just need to disagree about that one!Agreed, but a background figure depicted as white blonde woman.
Even though she actually has bleach blonde hair?Agreed, but a background figure depicted as white blonde woman.
Even though she actually has bleach blonde hair?
I know... Not really sure why I'm bothering really. It's like debating with stig in the F1 thread, and I've already learned it's best to just sit back and enjoy the show there.The perpetually offended don't allow facts to get in the way of a good whinge.
Who is the white women in the cartoon anyway?
Well then why isn’t her skin colour the same tone as the umpires? It clearly isn’t. I agree with you that Osaka’s skin colour appears lighter but I’m fairly certain that’s because of the contrast to background colours, however her skin colour is fairly similar to serenas in actuality.Agreed, but a background figure depicted as white blonde woman.
Not a white woman according to the people that will even refuse to believe their eyes as long as it means this illustration isn't seen as culturally rather insensitive.
It's all got very odd in here.
Kinda like how you refuse to believe the posts showing that she isn't white and that she actually has blonde hair in real life?
Definitely odd.
The hair is irrelevant (but still completely wrong if it was meant to be osaka).
Grabbing a swatch of the darkest shaded bit of skin on one and comparing it to the lightest shaded bit of the other is a meaningless comparison
Either the artist is dreadful/colourblind or he intentionally drew the opponent as a white blonde woman.
I'm honestly flummoxed that this is even up for debate.
I dunnooooo are we reading too much into this?
It is, and she is!I thought it's just about Serena being a bad loser.
you are describing how serena williams looks... she had a top knot and she is huge. most powerful women i have ever seen on a sports field.
Ok... If it's irrelevant, why have you mentioned it so many times?
He picked out three shades on Serena, not just the darkest one.
The Osaka drawing is tiny and has barely any paint on it. The only bit that's lighter is a small area by her chin.
You do realise that it isn't meant to be an accurate portrait. It's a cartoon.
Honestly, you really are reaching here.