Soldato
The mod's he did made zero difference btw.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
In his stream (https://www.twitch.tv/buildzoid/v/75850933) he explained at 54mins how AMD mocked up the power delivery on the reference card. I hope for much better OC results and power consumption on custom PCBs.
Calm down lads.
Simple really, a few the extra fps but with benefit of lower temps and avoid throttling for more consistent performance.
Its surprising sometimes when you look at cards like even the beastly Zotac 1080 Amp Extreme how few extra fps in many titles is only gained over the stock/boost.
This is just all wrong, I don't know where to begin. Despite what Gibbo says (hint: he wants to keep selling 480s and doesn't seem to have a good enough grasp of the issue, not his fault, half the people here are posting rubbish and trying to cloud it) this isn't going away. This tosh about minimum IS bunk yet you have the gall to talk about "debunking". If you don't know what you're talking about and are just trying to carry water for AMD out of some butthurt fanboy sentiment, please just be quiet and let the experts hash it out. Someone from pcper even posted here trying to give you the straight dope but you put your hands over your ears and screamed LALALA.
Funnily enough this would have been sorted already if there wasn't so much FUD flying around from the red team trying to cover it up.
Same thing happens with CPU OCing, but people get blinded by the bigger numbers in their Afterburner.
The 480 is about as interesting as piles .
So your saying im wrong and tomshardware is wrong? And Gibbo who has a lot of renown would not stick his neck on the line and say its a no problem, just to sell more gpus if it was really a problem. It would look bad making a statement like that if it was not true. Like i said its a non issue. People exaggerating.
Well going by the guys stream, he managed to get a watercooled reference rx480 to 1410mhz stable on core with fury x performance from the firestrike numbers. he couldn't get it past that even with modding it with more capacitors to smooth the voltage.
he tried to volt mod it, but it appears to be a pain to do, so he didn't manage in the end.
Well going by the guys stream, he managed to get a watercooled reference rx480 to 1410mhz stable on core with fury x performance from the firestrike numbers. he couldn't get it past that even with modding it with more capacitors to smooth the voltage.
he tried to volt mod it, but it appears to be a pain to do, so he didn't manage in the end.
There's always the (high) possibility that it's power limited and the AIB's with 8 pin power will be able to go further.
Sapphire said the card didn't really need an 8pin.
Seemingly the card isn't power limited, it's something else going on.
Sapphire said the card didn't really need an 8pin.
Seemingly the card isn't power limited, it's something else going on.
You can get molex 4 pin to 8 pin adapters.
Don't appear to have any molex connectors either!
Well then sata to molex to pcie
perfect solution lol
That is your own persecution complex speaking.It worries me though how this is much more of an issue to a lot of people than the whole 970 3.5GB thing.