I mean clearly the 7950x got lonely at being 95c, intel has to beat them in a few more things.100c with an 360 aio btw
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
I mean clearly the 7950x got lonely at being 95c, intel has to beat them in a few more things.100c with an 360 aio btw
Exactly what many were expecting, fastest gaming CPU. Best CPU to pair with a 4090 as well, @Grim5 do you agree?
Well i think most people should be able to see thatReally? You think a 4090 and a 13900k will draw 1k watts. In a game? LOL ok buddy.
On topic, the MT results are very underwhelming. For gaming, yeah it's really really fast, can't see the 3d holding a candle to this - especially with the fast ddr5 adies.
If the cost (CPU + higher end DDR5), power draw and cooling it is of no concern, yeah. Otherwise, there are far better options if you aren't graph watching while gaming.
Really? You think a 4090 and a 13900k will draw 1k watts. In a game? LOL ok buddy.
On topic, the MT results are very underwhelming. For gaming, yeah it's really really fast, can't see the 3d holding a candle to this - especially with the fast ddr5 adies.
100c with an 360 aio btw
Yes, it is, they should have done a better job to keep it cool, But intel have just done worse, so if I was buying one now I would probably inch toward AMD especially since it now being a dead platform. ( The intel platform )Oh okay.... hotter than the 7950X, so are Intel the new king of heat now then? have they taken that heat crown from AMD?
No, while tech journalists made a big thing of 95c on the 7950X with infantile Youtube thumbnails no one cares the Intel CPU is even hotter.
So i'm confused, is 95C a huge problem or not??????
Oh okay.... hotter than the 7950X, so are Intel the new king of heat now then? have they taken that heat crown from AMD?
No, while tech journalists made a big thing of 95c on the 7950X with infantile Youtube thumbnails no one cares the Intel CPU is even hotter.
So i'm confused, is 95C a huge problem or not??????
When Zen 4 CPUs arrived we saw quite a few comments along the lines of, "Why did Intel get so much flack for high temperatures? Because when AMD does it, it's just okay whatever 95c is fine."
The reason for this was simple, Zen 4 CPUs didn't suffer from thermal throttling and power consumption wasn't insane and this should really be the focus, not operating temperatures.
Illustrating this point is this comparison between the 13900K and 7950X, both using the Arctic Liquid Freezer II 120mm AIO liquid cooler. Now, you wouldn't pair either of these CPUs with a 120mm AIO, but with the 7950X you could and still receive performance that's comparable to what's been shown in this review.
Using the very best cooling, the 7950X maintains an all-core frequency of 5.1 GHz, with the 120mm AIO installed that frequency dropped by a mere 2% to 5.0 GHz. The 13900K on the other hand dropped from 5.2 GHz to 4.8 GHz, a more significant 8% decline in operating frequency, while also running 5c hotter.
Yes, it is, they should have done a better job to keep it cool, But intel have just done worse, so if I was buying one now I would probably inch toward AMD especially since it now being a dead platform. ( The intel platform )
Techspot / hub made a big deal about it because the 13900K was throttling.
Intel Core i9-13900K Review: Hot and Hungry
Hot of the heels of AMD's Zen 4 series launch, here comes Intel with their highly anticipated 13th-gen Core series, codenamed Raptor Lake. Today we're reviewing the...www.techspot.com
but hang on guys, several Intel users in this thread were adamant that 13th gen was super efficient, achieved better MT performance for free and would not exceed its 240w PL
What gives guys, why is the 13900k pulling 350w out of the box!??
I mean clearly the 7950x got lonely at being 95c, intel has to beat them in a few more things.
Still not sure if its worth upgrading my 12700k to a 13700k tbh, there's barely anything out.
but hang on guys, several Intel users in this thread were adamant that 13th gen was super efficient, achieved better MT performance for free and would not exceed its 240w PL
What gives guys, why is the 13900k pulling 350w out of the box!??
but hang on guys, several Intel users in this thread were adamant that 13th gen was super efficient, achieved better MT performance for free and would not exceed its 240w PL
What gives guys, why is the 13900k pulling 350w out of the box!?? And why does it run 15c hotter than the 12900k and thermal throttle at 100c on a 360mm AIO??
It's so much worse for the Intel. The 7950x able to hold its MT performance without throttling. The 13900k quickly thermal throttles on liquid cooling and continues to lose performance the longer you use it for
I don't blame reviewers but 10 mins stress test is not really showing what a person who is using it for those purposes will see, very interested now in X3D my 12900k can wait until then.It's so much worse for the Intel. The 7950x able to hold its MT performance without throttling. The 13900k quickly thermal throttles on liquid cooling and continues to lose performance the longer you use it for