- Joined
- 10 Mar 2006
- Posts
- 3,975
That looks very nice.
Bearing in mind I have no experience, and this is only based on a lot of reading, if you want to put a camera in it you'll have to see how much space there is (presumably you'll need to do some chopping of the fuselage if you want it facing downwards), and it will affect the centre of gravity.
Too much at weight at the front and potentially not being able to move things about will restrict you in that regard.
It's made of EPO foam which is (supposedly) very good for strength and seeing as you have 2m wingspan with an efficient puller prop set up (i.e. in front of the plane and not behind like mine, which is less efficient as the air is disturbed by the plane by the time it gets to the propellor) it must be able to haul itself along nicely.
The Skywalker is apparently very good - huge space inside the plane for lots of camera type stuff. It's not as big and again it's a pusher like mine, but it might be more suited for what you want to do with it.
Bearing in mind I have no experience, and this is only based on a lot of reading, if you want to put a camera in it you'll have to see how much space there is (presumably you'll need to do some chopping of the fuselage if you want it facing downwards), and it will affect the centre of gravity.
Too much at weight at the front and potentially not being able to move things about will restrict you in that regard.
It's made of EPO foam which is (supposedly) very good for strength and seeing as you have 2m wingspan with an efficient puller prop set up (i.e. in front of the plane and not behind like mine, which is less efficient as the air is disturbed by the plane by the time it gets to the propellor) it must be able to haul itself along nicely.
The Skywalker is apparently very good - huge space inside the plane for lots of camera type stuff. It's not as big and again it's a pusher like mine, but it might be more suited for what you want to do with it.