DLSS is better than native, FSR is fuzzy mode.
DLSS is better than TAA and TAAU, it is not better than native and never will be. DLSS has its place but it for sure doesn't make image quality better than native.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
DLSS is better than native, FSR is fuzzy mode.
But why not naming their cards 7800 then? They did that in the past with the RDNA1.Hardware Canucks claim they have spoken to AMD and specifically asked about the RTX4090 and they claim AMD told them they are not trying to compete with the RTX4090, they are competing with the RTX 4080
Theres also a gigantic gap between the price of these cards
So looking at the extrapolated numbers from Linus at min;
The 7900xtx gets 24fps
The 3090Ti gets about 26/27fps
So for the 7900xtx to have 29.4% less RT Intersections per second than the 3090Ti and get basically the same performance is actually pretty solid surely?
Or the 4090 is not 5.8x / 484% faster than the 7900xtx either. It is appearing to be about 2x faster. So diminishing returns for that side of things.
But why not naming their cards 7800 then? They did that in the past with the RDNA1.
This must be said because Nvidia is not the only company trying to sell us a 4070 as a 4080. AMD is also doing this trying to sell a 7800 as a 7900xtx.
That is not too bad, having 3090 TI level of perf in Metro Exodus EE, that is very good perf for the price.PCGH 7900xtx raster and rt estimates.
RDNA 2 had similar raster perf to Nvidia best and similar price gap. And yet it sold very poor. Now, there is a bigger perf gap, the truth is that compared with the 4090 the 7900xtx looks like a 7800xt at most. the 4080 16 gb looks like a 4070.You should be comparing prices with performance
If Nvidia priced the 4080 16gb £750-£800 would be no discussion to be had
That was such a meme I bought a used one cheap to put on the wall.Why does this remind me of Nvidia of old - OMFG WERE GOING TO LOSE SO INFINITE POWER MODE!
*Insert GTX 480 thermi frying an egg meme
RDNA 2 had similar raster perf to Nvidia best and similar price gap. And yet it sold very poor. Now, there is a bigger perf gap, the truth is that compared with the 4090 the 7900xtx looks like a 7800xt at most. the 4080 16 gb looks like a 4070.
You can look at it in another way that uplift from 6000 series without increasing RRP
Will they continue with the next release? Pretty sure Nvidia can't just keep hiking every generation
But why not naming their cards 7800 then? They did that in the past with the RDNA1.
This must be said because Nvidia is not the only company trying to sell us a 4070 as a 4080. AMD is also doing this trying to sell a 7800 as a 7900xtx.
I don't see them bringing a better card to the market, at least in the last year. Maybe after Nvidia is releasing the TI, Super and all the other names Jensen can think at, we will see a 7950 released, as we all prepare for the next gen.Because it looks like they are tried to copy Nvidias dumb naming scheme where the 7900xtx was went to beat the 4080 16gb and 7900xt beat the 4080 12gb and the reason for using the 9 instead of 8 is to signal to buyers we are faster (marketing stuff..). An actual 4090 or 4090ti competitor would be the 7950xt/7950xtx if such a thing is to exist in the future