Soldato
- Joined
- 8 Jun 2018
- Posts
- 2,827
Is he being cringy again? LOLwhat an "interesting" watch...(NOT)
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Is he being cringy again? LOLwhat an "interesting" watch...(NOT)
you know you can change the playback speed of youtube videos?
has the RT performance of a last gen nvidia card though, inte's next gen card will probably have better RT than this
It’s a good watch for Nvidia fanboys who can’t afford Rtx 4090 and wants ADA and are justifying Rtx 4080 and realising there is nothing to justify it and so resort to making stuff up!It's a good watch for Nvidia fans who are really trying to find a way to take a competitor to the 4080 and try and force it to be compared to the 4090 instead.
Is he being cringy again? LOL
what an "interesting" watch...(NOT)
Oh, I forgot to tell you about him. He's done this before. The last time he did it he got scolded so much he laid low and deleted the video. And people found out that his "inside sources" all came from someone he knows at MSI. So, I wouldn't worry to much about him. He's certainly doing it for the "clicks".What the heck haha
That guy flipped so hard from amd bandwagon to nvidia bandwagon in 48 hours
And that video title, such clickbait. If people just ignore any rumours they heard in the past about rdna3 and just look at what the $999 7900xtx is right now then it's a very good product and nowhere near what that video title is claiming, I think of several AMD GPUs that launched in actual bad shape, the 7900xtx is not even close to being a bad product
Is Sapphire still the go to vender when buying AMD cards or are there any others that have replaced them?
Rtx 4090 £500 wenSeems everyone annoyed was just hoping for a price cut on the 4090 with no intention of ever buying AMD.
The bigger the GPU the bigger the e-peen and only benchmarks make the e-peen happy?The thing is, I've been on this forum for a long time and it's interesting that the most vocal GPU enthusiasts don't seem to post much in the pc gaming forum. They are extreme benchmark whores and probably don't actually complete half of the stuff they load up.
The raster gap could be as much as 60% in AMDs favor in some titles although I think 30-40% will be the average which would have been the equivalent gap of a 3070 vs a 6900XT, now imagine the 3070 was 1200 quid.4080 16gb at £750-£800 would have probably ended 7900xtx , even with slightly less raster but better RT
This is the observation we have been posting for years! When AMD were weak the excuses were "if only they offered competition.." Then when they give you choice "ahh but my rich feature set and productivity I use once a year, nah I'll pay the extra.."
I have not used CUDA nor other "productivity" features of my 3080Ti even once, since I got it. Neither I did it on 2070S back in the days. And that's on a PC I use for work as well. I simply need none of these, aside proper gaming performance and ability to watch videos. Low power use and silence are nice bonuses!This is the observation we have been posting for years! When AMD were weak the excuses were "if only they offered competition.." Then when they give you choice "ahh but my rich feature set and productivity I use once a year, nah I'll pay the extra.."
Same actually. If I wanted to see someone point all the silly marketing in presentation - I'd watch GN (and I have). At east GN can see both positive and negative bits and present them well.I lasted 30 seconds, then turned it off.
As I said earlier, it's quite clear. They wanted good competitor of 4090, much cheaper than 4090 - just so 4090 would drop in price so they could buy it cheaper (as they would NEVER buy AMD, no matter what). And it's not, it's 4080 competitor, hence salt is everywhere.I don't know if you're being sarcastic or not I mean the 6950 already beats the 3080 as it is.
I don't get why Nvidia fans are so upset by this AMD launch.
You guys chose to spend £1700 on a GPU maybe go and game on it, enjoy your purchase.
It seems very expensive to spend £1700 so you can use those pixels to **** on a product you have no interest in buying.
As I said earlier, it's quite clear. They wanted good competitor of 4090, much cheaper than 4090 - just so 4090 would drop in price so they could buy it cheaper (as they would NEVER buy AMD, no matter what). And it's not, it's 4080 competitor, hence salt is everywhere.
ofcourse they do... nothing about pushing games forward and getting out of the boring stale graphics of the last 5-7 years, held back by cards with poor RT performance.As I said earlier, it's quite clear. They wanted good competitor of 4090, much cheaper than 4090 - just so 4090 would drop in price so they could buy it cheaper (as they would NEVER buy AMD, no matter what). And it's not, it's 4080 competitor, hence salt is everywhere.
I love how people think anyone who can afford to spend 1700 on a graphics card suddenly misses that money and wants it back they probably have another 2k+ since these cards came out burning another hole in their pocket.They're never going to buy AMD in a million years and they know it, they're salty AF right now because AMD just called their bluff, and the mental gymnastics required to justify they 2K they just spent has just gone through the roof.