A more flexible fast travel should be in the game, realism and 'thats not how the game should be played' aren't valid reasons for it not being there. Once you've invested 80 odd hours into the game travelling around constantly isn't remotely fun, games should be fun. It should be there for those who want to use it, don't want to use it then don't, no excuse for it not being in the game.
It's nothing to do with age, or gaming experience, I've been gaming since the 80s so am far away from being a millennial but the travel is 100% tedious after a while. Calling it out as such shouldn't be frowned upon.
AC keeps getting mentioned because it's superior in certain facets, they're both open world games so of course they're going to be compared. There's no need for people to get upset just because that's happening, RDR2 gets mentioned in the ACO thread too.
It's nothing to do with age, or gaming experience, I've been gaming since the 80s so am far away from being a millennial but the travel is 100% tedious after a while. Calling it out as such shouldn't be frowned upon.
AC keeps getting mentioned because it's superior in certain facets, they're both open world games so of course they're going to be compared. There's no need for people to get upset just because that's happening, RDR2 gets mentioned in the ACO thread too.
Last edited: