Soldato
- Joined
- 14 Aug 2009
- Posts
- 3,228
Yeah, I do find comments stating the game should run better at ultra a bit odd. Like these settings are in somehow universal across all games. Surely its a judgement on whether you think the performance is good enough for how the game actually looks. Now I'm not necessarrily saying it does look outstanding enough for the lowish fps some people are getting, but there is still no point in "should run better than 60 fps at 4K in Ultra with x hardware"
I think the problem is not with "ultra should run 60fps@4k on a 2080ti", but rather "the image quality gain by using ultra doesn't justify the pefromance penalty (I would dare say is not justified by far)". Also talking about Ultra and Crysis 2, what should be understand from that tweet, that on ultra they overtesselate and use settings with no visual feedback just for the sake of doing it? I mean getting 27fps in a scenario with water physics to maxium and one step down shots the fps to 37fps (37% increase), with nothing easy to spot visually is ... funny.
Don't get me wrong, the game does look nice and probably up to some point the harwdware required to run it is justified, but beyong a certain point...