Soldato
- Joined
- 10 Nov 2003
- Posts
- 14,034
- Location
- Surrey, by the river
Just found an interesting article on cervelo website about the benefits of lightweight bikes vs aero bikes. Seems like quite a nice balanced article and obviously cervelo make both a lightweight frame and an aero frame so they have no reason to skew the results. (linky)
Their conclusion is that for a pro rider who can hold around 400watts, an aero bike is faster on anything up to an 8% climb. For an average rider doing about 250watts, anything up to 5% is faster with an aero frame.
In their simulations, the aero bike was faster on the route of the 2007 etape du tour (which followed the route of the hilliest stage that year).
There was an article in Cyclist a few months back explaining how Brad Wiggins would have been quicker up mountain stages on a recumbent.