Been getting a couple of Zwift races under my belt to try and get some legs back - but really lacking some solid outdoor miles so they're a bit of a substitute more than anything else. Just no time! Need to do something epic soon to really get the summer started...
I think I need to upgrade the bike before doing an imperial century though. It is quite heavy (14kg) and I think road wheels and a road bike will help to avoid some of the wind and hopefully give some ‘free’ speed.
Great riding and well done, certainly on a hybrid! You'll find a road bike quite a bit faster - certainly for road use!
As a heads up, i'm a fan of hydration tablets during warmer months, and these are a bargain!
O.R.S Hydration Tablets are a mix of electrolytes combined with a low-calorie small dose of glucose which is not only proven to be the fastest way to restore a healthy level of hydration but it also keeps you hydrated for longer than water alone. Formulated by pharmacists Natural Flavours...
pharmacy4you.co.uk
Great price, postage quite cheap too (£1.99) which is what they normally sting you with things like this. Didn't get some as I'm well stocked and tend to stick to what I know (High5).
Insurance prices seem bonkers in general this year.
After some opinions and insight...
Our home insurance (with AXA) went up by £30 this year which the bikes are on. Up to £246 pa so likely very low compared with most of you on here - I expect! We're on probably one of the lowest bands in the country... Being right next to the SAS camp with lots of MP's in police cars regularly patrolling has it's uses!
Currently has 3 bikes nominated on it, £2500 for my Diverge, turbo bike £350, other halfs commuter £700. Think those last 2 are the wrong way around - but her commuter is higher risk so really not an issue. Garage where they're kept has a £3000 'contents' cover (which doesn't cover bikes, so they're separate). I can't easily tell how much we're paying for the 3 bikes, but would judge it's less than £10-15 a month?
We always have a debate when it comes to cost of bikes on the policy, my other half used to be an insurance broker (car & home) so tends to have it nailed down & researched for the best deals. She still has a few contacts and knows how to 'talk the talk' to get good rates. But our discussions are always pretty awkward when it comes to 'value'. I feel all of our bikes have really 'paid their dues' I've generally argued to insure them for what we paid for them, rather than what they're 'worth' - how do you all do yours...? Specifically older bikes (pre-lockdown) which you've upgraded and the base models have drastically increased in value?!
My argument is - as can only 'prove' what we paid for them with receipts which an insurer would pay out against, rather than current market rate of comparable bikes. How can you 'prove' the worth of something if you paid £1750 for it, it's aged, yet the model has changed and the current 'replacement' is £4500 - when I only paid £1750 enough years ago it should have depreciated to almost nothing. The insurer will not want to pay out more which you can't 'prove' just because the market has gone up in value?! Just doesn't make sense to me otherwise...! Equally, if I had £2500 now I wouldn't be scratching around for another 2k to buy another Diverge, I would quite happily find a 'replacement' bike at that value.
My Zwift frame did 4-5 years of commuting and leisure before being Zwift only, while costing me £900 originally in 2014, then got warranty frame replaced in 2022. The
current replacement comparable (Defy 1) would be £3200! My Diverge cost me £1750 but has a bunch of upgrades - probably need to up the value on it really - but again consider as I commute its cost has mostly been covered the last 6 years by not running a second car (see below).
Replacement would be £4200! Other halfs commuter again, 7-8 years old and around £350-400 original cost.
Replacement now around £600-700.
My thinking on why kinda 'under insuring' (is that a thing?) our bikes is valid - obviously plus point keeps the renewal and premium value down. We've basically used our bikes for (me 95%, her 75%) of our commutes the last ~10 years. This has meant keeping the current 'family car' for 12 years and being able to just have 1 car (a Fiesta Zetec S at that, nothing fancy or expensive!). Being originally mine, it's a 13 year old car if it was used for work, it would've got traded in probably 5-6 years ago and we also would've kept the other halfs she sold 7-8 years ago too. So in my mind, running a single old family car which does 4-5000 miles at most a year, long past it's trade in time when it was worth anything (we'll keep it until it dies), saves us easily 3-4000 a year in maintenance, running costs and fuel of double that mileage by using bikes. So that 'offset' against our bikes I can easily justify 'losing' 1-2000 a year and still be quids in. Does that make sense? So in my mind, once each of our bikes hit 2 or 3 years old, the cost they've saved against their value is basically null. Once over 4-5 years old easy to just 'get another' with any payout to assist (if covered) and something happened, regardless of the market values.