Would O'Neill be a good alternative to Hodgson?
Roy Hodgeson
- Thread starter TangoSixteen
- Start date
- Status
I don't think so. I want to see us play good attacking football that is not his style.
In fairness, most of the discussion going on in here revolves around Roy Hodgson in one way or another, so its not really a proper club thread in my eyes.
Its inevitable there will be club related discussions cropping up here and there but it isn't doing anyone any harm.
Let the poor Liverpool fans rant away
Soldato
- Joined
- 14 Feb 2004
- Posts
- 14,312
- Location
- Peoples Republic of Histonia, Cambridge
Ok let's bring this back on topic.
I'm getting sick of Hodgson's excuses and defeatism. Every couple of days he comes out with a fresh load of waffle about how there's no quick fix and rebuilding takes time etc etc etc. For a start how does he think that’s going affect the currently players? Gerard, Torres and Reina must be chomping at the bit to hang around for a few more seasons of mid table football. He needs to start being a bit more positive.
Dose he not understand that you don't get time for free at this level. You have to make your own time by showing progress, especially when you’re so far behind your rivals. It's been one step forward, two steps back and his impact has been negligible. The most disappointing thing is I've not seen us play any good football in any competition all season. It's been consistently sloppy, disjointed and toothless.
He maybe a great manager but I'm not prepared to wait 2-3 seasons for results to materialise. It’s time the board started making way for his departure.
Last edited:
Does this read to anyone else as "I was told I couldn't play them as if they get injured we couldn't sell them in January"?
Liverpool threads are allowed
It took Fulham a while (3/4 months iirc) to come round to Woy and his ways.
Might take longer for the players at 'pool.
I'd still stick with him until the summer when you can have a summer of rebuilding.
It took Fulham a while (3/4 months iirc) to come round to Woy and his ways.
Might take longer for the players at 'pool.
I'd still stick with him until the summer when you can have a summer of rebuilding.
Its all ok look !!
Hodgson says just have patience and dont judge him yet, judge him after <insert this weeks decided number of games>
http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11095_6605566,00.html
Hodgson says just have patience and dont judge him yet, judge him after <insert this weeks decided number of games>
http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11095_6605566,00.html
Caporegime
- Joined
- 21 Nov 2005
- Posts
- 41,256
- Location
- Cornwall
If he spent half as much time managing the team has he does talking to the press we might not look such a shambles on the pitch.
I wouldn't say this thread has gone off topic more than any other thread does. 99% of posts are directly related to Hodgson and the odd post that isn't is usually to do with players that Hodgson has signed, which is sort of related anyway.
Wouldn't it just be easier to ban Tummy? He's either baiting you or failing to be funny, both offenses are worthy of a ban.
Wouldn't it just be easier to ban Tummy? He's either baiting you or failing to be funny, both offenses are worthy of a ban.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 9 Mar 2006
- Posts
- 58,011
- Location
- Surrey
Right, so if we had a thread called Fergie where we discussed the games Fergie managed, and the signings Fergie had made and the future signings Fergie might make and the tactics that Fergie employed and the chances that the side that Fergie managed would win the premiership....would that be ok?
Associate
- Joined
- 26 Mar 2009
- Posts
- 1,807
- Location
- State of Volatile Apathy
Thread should be closed not on rule infringement but on the principle of BaZ87 taking up 97% of it disagreeing with people pointing out that Livermule were grainy scat-residue before Woy took over.
You agree with DM and his apprentice? Rotty should ban you too
Might as well ban all the Mancs tbh. The world would be a better place.
I personally don't have an issue with club threads so yes. I'm not sure that it would be quite the same as this thread though.
Associate
- Joined
- 26 Mar 2009
- Posts
- 1,807
- Location
- State of Volatile Apathy
Nope, just think that when joining the Hodgeson-hating manlove pyramid Scousers should remember the problems pre-existing Hodgeson, the foremost of which is that Liverstool are now as ****-poor as the urine-filled bottles thrown out of the Kop End.
I don't think anybody has forgotten our issues before Hodgson took the job. This thread is more to do with the fact that Hodgson was never the right man to take us forward and in fact has done worse than most thought was even possible.
Unfortunately some people ignore that and think Liverpool fans expected Hodgson to win the league.
Unfortunately some people ignore that and think Liverpool fans expected Hodgson to win the league.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 9 Mar 2006
- Posts
- 58,011
- Location
- Surrey
Me neither, see no reason why they shouldn't be allowed but if they're banned for one they should be banned for all
Associate
- Joined
- 26 Mar 2009
- Posts
- 1,807
- Location
- State of Volatile Apathy
Okay, to be fair I think there has been a rather even hand in these threads given that there's occasionally a 'Glazers ruining United GRAB YER GREEN AND GOLD AND LETS SHOW EM from our seats at the Stretford End' or such thread and it's allowed to run itself out of steam without closure.
Perhaps the fact that no other bigger club is really in crisis is more revealing of the recent trend in Quiverpool threads rather than some double standard?
Perhaps the fact that no other bigger club is really in crisis is more revealing of the recent trend in Quiverpool threads rather than some double standard?
Me neither, see no reason why they shouldn't be allowed but if they're banned for one they should be banned for all
They are
This thread has been created to discuss Hodgson's performance as Liverpool manager and whether or not he should have got the job/still be in a job.
You get the odd post that goes off topic but it's not like this thread has been used to discuss specific games, players, injuries etc. The majority of the posts are directly linked to why or why not Hodgson should be Liverpool manager.
- Status