Are you getting "gang" and "military intelligence" mixed up?
I just read the article on Military Intelligence on wikipedia, and I do not see any correlation between it and any description of my post.
So the short answer to your question is, no.
The longer answer; The fact that some gangs have military-like operational standards does not literally mean they operate under or according to "military intelligence".
Hmm... I think you're having a laugh
. However political parties could be likened to a gang, where the seats they strive for could be considered a metaphorical "territory".
but you have?
and most "big sophisticated" gangs are world known, because well they're big and it's hard to hide your actions when you're moving hundreds of millions of pounds worth of illicit material a year.
The Zetas being one of the more widely known.
I have first hand exposure to "gang" activity, both unstructured small-time rats and highly organised factions, yes.
I never said big sophisticated gangs aren't known. You don't need to be part of the Medellin Cartel to know how exceptionally organised some gangs can be. But it would be an advantage if one trying to gain and share knowledge on gang culture resides in a gang infested city like London rather than live in a secluded village or something.
So you're in a car surrounded by ****ed off bikers, knocking bits off your car and your wife and child are screaming, you just sit there like a tool and do nothing?
Bravo
Exactly. The RR driver should be commended for his patience if anything. I can imagine some people wouldn't have hesitated to side-swipe them into the central reservation, further backing up that he was genuinely only just trying to get away from harm, self defence.
Anyway sorry for evolving this thread into literal criminal gang discussion. I was merely pointing out a simple fact that a gang without a ring leader leads to deindividuation. It should be stressed that the outcome does depend on the sanity of the leader. Yes, according to the group dynamics the situation would most probably descend to chaos and aggression, and this is what happened; but
if a 'sane' leader was present the situation could be controlled...
At 5:05, It was the choice of the person who decided to run up to the car. He could have easily portrayed himself in "reasoning mode" by using simple body language. Instead he went straight for the door handle. He could have walked over slowly and waved to roll the window down. Remember the RR stopped at this point he was willing to talk. This is what my posts are talking about; why didn't a reasonable person be the one to walk to the car at that specific moment at time and what are the chances of any of them being reasonable.
It is clear there was no control in this gang. This is evident merely from the way they were using public highways.
I'm only agreeing with most people, this parade was a free for all shambles and they are 100% at fault, if they were riding properly this simply wouldn't have happened. 30 abreast on a public road
put em all in a line and throw the book at them.
