Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Makes the 7900XT, with its new lower price, look like better "value".
I think Nvidia do not consider AMD competition so do not care, given there near monopoly, but Intel made the same mistake, on CPUs, and look what happened.
Might be better to wait on the RTX 5000 or RX8000 cards at this point, unless something dramatically changes in regards to pricing, this gen.
For the performance it offers it should be a 4060 Ti.
VideoCardz.com are reporting, Base clock as, 1920MHz, and, Boost Clock as, 2475MHz.
Depressingly, 5,888 CUDA cores, is probably correct.
I thinking, £600/£500/£400, given inflation, but we can hope for lower.
I no longer believe that AMD or Intel will force Nvidia's prices lower and that Nvidia is resting on its current dominance of the market to keep prices high.Once again I'm hearing prayers of AMD pricing their cards lower... to get the desired Nvidia cards lower...
It's definitely got the weight of a prayer. AMD has to drop prices without any benefit to them, for people that won't buy
They can just stay just below Nvidia pricing and the money coming in or not will tell the truth.
That is a good possibility, as there looks like there will be 10GB, 12GB and 16GB models so they may launch the 12GB at £600 to £650 first so it looks better than it is, and see the 10GB model at £500-550 and the 16GB model at, £700-750.
Nvidia do make good products, the 4090 is excellent, the 4080 is also, but the 4070 Ti is debatable, but the specs for the 4070, does not make it premium or better, in comparison the 3070 Ti or more comparable the 3080 are better overall products.Wouldn't say we were "digging it up" tbh given the trend of discussion before hand was about vram.
Whilst it is banter, at the same time, it is a perfectly valid point though in all seriousness, people keep banging on about how nvidia are doing them over so badly yet those same people keep buying nvidia....Why not vote with your wallet and buy from amd, they are providing everything people want/care about i.e. cheaper and more vram. Is it really nvidias problem if they provide a more premium/better product "overall" and people keep supporting their methods by buying said products? Seems to me more like a user base/customer problem.....
It depends on whether you have a 4K monitor, or plan on buying one, that's when a 256bit or higher memory bus and more VRAM come into there own. The 4070 Ti in the more demanding games, Hogwarts Legacy, the most recent example, struggles, whereas the Intel A770 16GB, had less FPS, but had no stuttering other issues as had a larger bus and more VRAM.
I would agree that at 1440p the 4070 TI looks good in most games but many people, including myself, by cards for the long term, 5 years plus, and if the 4070 Ti is close to the limit at launch will it stand up to 5 years,and that is where my main issue is, if I spend £700-£800 on a GPU, will it last.
True, but given the pricing for the 4000 series so far it was not totally beyond belief, which is what is really depressing.
No evidence it was made up but he was wrong and that happens when dealing in rumours but what I was saying was that Nvidia's actions and pricing on the 4000 series did make the rumour not totally implausible, which in of itself not good either.
