Soldato
- Joined
- 23 Jun 2004
- Posts
- 4,886
- Location
- Blackburn
Also all this talk of "back then" makes me wanna fire up Quake, Heretic, Duke Nukem 3d and Redneck Rampage when I get home
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Thats just it. RT is the future but unfortunately brought to tech too soon that can't handle it properly.
yes but Nvidia claims the shadows will be "physically correct" so it must be worth itBut they are now doing path tracing... at 16 FPS native on a 4090.....but of course if you turn on DLSS3 fake frames (that was meant to double your frame rate) magic happens..it goes to 127FPS...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 outputs as low as 16 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 Overdrive Mode without DLSS - VideoCardz.com
Cyberpunk 2077 Overdrive Mode is the new Crysis Where is the RTX 4090 Ti when you need it? RTX 4090 at 4K in Cyberpunk 2077 Overdrive Mode, Source: NVIDIA The video released by NVIDIA is a technology comparison between full raster mode without raytracing and the upcoming Overdrive Mode, which...videocardz.com
Anyways I'm bored of this FG topic now as it's just unreal to me that performance is now measured in fake frames being inserted. If a GPU can't do 30-60fps native resolution with any new graphics enhancing feature then it needs better hardware before being used. Fake frames and upscaling from lower resolutions is not how we measured GPU performance historically. Apples to apples not apples to coconuts..
They'll probably come out with DLSS4 in another 2 years which will just make each frame repeat to double your fps while then also adding a fake frame between.But they are now doing path tracing... at 16 FPS native on a 4090.....but of course if you turn on DLSS3 fake frames (that was meant to double your frame rate) magic happens..it goes to 127FPS...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 outputs as low as 16 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 Overdrive Mode without DLSS - VideoCardz.com
Cyberpunk 2077 Overdrive Mode is the new Crysis Where is the RTX 4090 Ti when you need it? RTX 4090 at 4K in Cyberpunk 2077 Overdrive Mode, Source: NVIDIA The video released by NVIDIA is a technology comparison between full raster mode without raytracing and the upcoming Overdrive Mode, which...videocardz.com
Anyways I'm bored of this FG topic now as it's just unreal to me that performance is now measured in fake frames being inserted. If a GPU can't do 30-60fps native resolution with any new graphics enhancing feature then it needs better hardware before being used. Fake frames and upscaling from lower resolutions is not how we measured GPU performance historically. Apples to apples not apples to coconuts..
Keep hearing 3090 is only 10% faster than a 3080, 3090's got higher lows than the 3080ti has avg fps?
If I turn off my monitor, I get perfect shadows at infinite FPS!yes but Nvidia claims the shadows will be "physically correct" so it must be worth it
I really hate to be right seeing this coming all the way back when Nvidia first introduced DLSS...But they are now doing path tracing... at 16 FPS native on a 4090.....but of course if you turn on DLSS3 fake frames (that was meant to double your frame rate) magic happens..it goes to 127FPS...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 outputs as low as 16 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 Overdrive Mode without DLSS - VideoCardz.com
Cyberpunk 2077 Overdrive Mode is the new Crysis Where is the RTX 4090 Ti when you need it? RTX 4090 at 4K in Cyberpunk 2077 Overdrive Mode, Source: NVIDIA The video released by NVIDIA is a technology comparison between full raster mode without raytracing and the upcoming Overdrive Mode, which...videocardz.com
Anyways I'm bored of this FG topic now as it's just unreal to me that performance is now measured in fake frames being inserted. If a GPU can't do 30-60fps native resolution with any new graphics enhancing feature then it needs better hardware before being used. Fake frames and upscaling from lower resolutions is not how we measured GPU performance historically. Apples to apples not apples to coconuts..
I really hate to be right seeing this coming all the way back when Nvidia first introduced DLSS...
...same also for Nvidia introduction of first Titan; I saw it coming that it was their first step toward lifting up the pricing cards at all tiers below. Took them 10 years, but they have finally done it with the 4000 series.
Prices have increase by a tier while cards physical specs have reduce by a tier.I really hate to be right seeing this coming all the way back when Nvidia first introduced DLSS...
...same also for Nvidia introduction of first Titan; I saw it coming that it was their first step toward lifting up the pricing cards at all tiers below. Took them 10 years, but they have finally done it with the 4000 series.
I am well aware of this.Prices have increase by a tier while cards physical specs have reduce by a tier.
The 4080 is really a 4070ti but priced like a 4080ti
The 4070ti is really a 4060ti but priced above an 80 class
4070 will be priced like a 4070ti while the spec around a 4060
Prices have increase by a tier while cards physical specs have reduce by a tier.
The 4080 is really a 4070ti but priced like a 4080ti
The 4070ti is really a 4060ti but priced above an 80 class
4070 will be priced like a 4070ti while the spec around a 4060
I am well aware of this.
Nvidia with their smokes and mirrors distractions playing with the naming game.
I am not blind enough to not notice how 1080ti, 980ti where the 80ti was the top card, and now they just called them xx90 to further elevate the pricing.
The RTX 3090 is not really relevant to new buyers these days. Wasn't it priced over £1,000 on launch?Only 10% remember how many said that.
That would be nice wouldn't it.They should sell some cards without RT to get the price down.
The RTX 3090 is not really relevant to new buyers these days. Wasn't it priced over £1,000 on launch?
Edit - The FE was priced at £1,399. So, it's in the >£1000 silly money category.
In comparison, the 3080 TI seemed somewhat impressive when it came out, considering the similar spec.
tbf, the 3080 TI FE was priced just over £1,000, so also silly price.
The 3090 was priced that way because Nvidia knows there are always people who will pay for this amount of VRAM, especially if it launches first.
Also all this talk of "back then" makes me wanna fire up Quake, Heretic, Duke Nukem 3d and Redneck Rampage when I get home
Its still relevant and buyers should absolutely consider it when its beating the 4070ti by over 10% in newly released games, having double the vram while also being available for £150 cheaper.The RTX 3090 is not really relevant to new buyers these days. Wasn't it priced over £1,000 on launch?
get a better monitor, i said the same thing at 60 fps to anyone on higher refresh, cant tell, dont need it blah blah then you see the smoother animations and you realise how wrong you wereRegarding a 'minimum playable framerate' I aim for either 60 or 70 FPS. Any thing over 60 I can't tell much difference, and the max refresh of my monitor is 70 hertz anyway.
Anything over 59 FPS feels very smooth to me, the most important thing is performance consistency.