Russell Brand.

She said looking back now that she would have said something and seemed to give off the impression that she is offended watching it

She even gave excuses for him back then, it was entertainment and encouraged.

Why is it 'uncomfortable' to watch now?

It was for me, I don't need to give my reasons.
It's like when you watch Jimmy Savile and you see a little girl sitting on his knee, you bet I feel uncomfortable with it.

So who is offended?

azazi187
 
Last edited:
She said looking back now that she would have said something and seemed to give off the impression that she is offended watching it
she's hardly going to come out and say 'ach catch yourselves on, it was a just wile bit of craic'...........she'd be hung drawn and quartered by the media/social media. daily mail headline of 'LK condones rapist behaviour'.....there'd be so much frothing the UK would look like it was in the middle of a rabies epidemic.
 
"investigative journalists" need an operating budget. An editor will decide what they are allowed to investigate. They are sent out like attack dogs. Don't pretend they have any public interests in mind.

I'm sure some are doing some good work. Its hard not to have doubts about the integrity when you have a supposed legendary investigative journalist in John Sweeney who was outed as potentially racist, homophobic and untrustworthy, then subsequently sacked by the BBC.
 
She even gave excuses for him back then, it was entertainment and encouraged.



It was for me, I don't need to give my reasons.
It's like when you watch Jimmy Savile and you see a little girl sitting on his knee, you bet I feel uncomfortable with it.



azazi187
I wasn't offended. I'm in the innocent until proven guilty camp here
 
she's hardly going to come out and say 'ach catch yourselves on, it was a just wile bit of craic'...........she'd be hung drawn and quartered by the media/social media. daily mail headline of 'LK condones rapist behaviour'.....there'd be so much frothing the UK would look like it was in the middle of a rabies epidemic.

This is a problem in that a lot of people won't risk coming out in his defence.
 
I'm offended by Brand's mere existence.

It is most curious to see righty-tighties defend a commie though, peak enjoyment tbh.

I'm offended too. How can someone so greasy and creepy bed so many women? They couldn't have looked at him and thought..."mmm...".

Just a smooth talker... :D
 
Last edited:
I'm offended too. How can someone so greasy and creepy bed so many women? They couldn't have looked at him and thought..."mmm...".

Just a smooth talker... :D
Weird looking sod imo. Looks like a cross between a gypsy fortune teller and a drag queen.

Edit: I’m not offended by him, maybe a tad jealous :p
 
Last edited:
And neither was she, in her own words today - https://www.dmpoole.co.uk/lorrainebrand.mp4

What she is doing though is judging the past with the standards held today. She's kind of not clear enough on that, despite the "looking back on it NOW" line. She didn't seem bothered at time, so just leave it at that.

In the age of archival footage (other than scrolls, and cave pictures) are we going to perpetually be pulling people up on past behaviour, that at the time was shown on TV and laughed at by all.

Now, if like Savile, it's proven that he's a dirty pervy sexual criminal, then yea, look back at it through dirty revisionist lens.

Edit: with the allegations there's a 'new' reality being formed around this person, with no proof. If it's repeated enough, it starts be accepted as actual reality, even though it isn't (yet ;).
 
Last edited:
It's hardly a new reality is it?

The Media/Entertainment industry has always been an vile, exploitative place and the more time a person spends in it the less clean they are because a moral, reasonable person would have quit very early on. They're all at it and playing defence for one of them may as well be playing defence for the whole lot of them.
 
I'm offended too. How can someone so greasy and creepy bed so many women? They couldn't have looked at him and thought..."mmm...".

Just a smooth talker... :D
Him and the likes of Noel Fielding were "rock stars" of comedy with groupies and the like 20 years ago. Never understood it, but women loved him, I guess it's the whole bad guy thing, plus "funny".
 
Him and the likes of Noel Fielding were "rock stars" of comedy with groupies and the like 20 years ago. Never understood it, but women loved him, I guess it's the whole bad guy thing, plus "funny".

Noel fielding looks creepy, while Brand is a creep lol.

I get that, but it makes you wonder more broadly about how selective some women are. If he was a random guy and not famous - same image and attitude - would he still have got so lucky?

Meh, as long as its consensual it's none of my business.
 
It's hardly a new reality is it?

The Media/Entertainment industry has always been an vile, exploitative place and the more time a person spends in it the less clean they are because a moral, reasonable person would have quit very early on. They're all at it and playing defence for one of them may as well be playing defence for the whole lot of them.

A week ago people weren't looking back at old footage saying "looking back on it now, I'd have said something". The reality is changing before our eyes, until the truth is confirmed one way or another. Would LK be saying that if it transpires these events in question are found to be completely lawful encounters? It doesn't change anything that he was a creepy pest back then (who knows what he's like now), so why judge it differently at this point, unless the way you see this reality has changed?
 
What she is doing though is judging the past with the standards held today. She's kind of not clear enough on that, despite the "looking back on it NOW" line. She didn't seem bothered at time, so just leave it at that.

and that's what she said, she wasn't bothered, she laughed, it was entertainment and it was encouraged but nowadays she might have said something because you know, we should have moved on from that.
She was judging what he did back then and let's face it, it's all about historical cases at this moment.
The only thing that bothered her was making people know she wasn't wearing suspenders for some reason.
You're making more of it than it is because I saw it has defending him.
 
This came up on my socials.

W5Y1AOy.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom