Associate
- Joined
- 9 May 2022
- Posts
- 1,899
- Location
- London
I’m just amazed roar sticks up so passionately for someone who is a lifetime member of the small arm gang.
no doubt he has. and i'm actually happy for you that you were able to forget he existed, wish i could do the same but none of that takes away from the fact that he was already hugely famous.
Goes to show how unprofessional Rumble is and one can only wonder what they've got hidden there under the rug of unmentionables.Looking back, I'm considering that Rumble is rattled because they don't have prepared answers and have knee jerked a poor response.
They mentioned "demanding a ban" which wasn't a thing and the committee has no power to say that. The limit of what they can do is demand information and slap a folder of their findings on the parliament floor and demand that the government look at it.
So has the potential to profit massively?
I’m just amazed roar sticks up so passionately for someone who is a lifetime member of the small arm gang.
really. Brand doesn't do his videos etc for the money?? bit early in the day for smoking the funny stuff.Russell Brand doesn't run his Youtube channel for "profit". If he wanted to make money he would've stayed in Hollywood making movies, he didn't take a penny from Katy Perry when they divorced despite him being entitled to millions.
Russell Brand doesn't run his Youtube channel for "profit". If he wanted to make money he would've stayed in Hollywood making movies, he didn't take a penny from Katy Perry when they divorced despite him being entitled to millions.
Russell Brand is a purple belt in BJJ, what do you do?
Russell Brand doesn't run his Youtube channel for "profit". If he wanted to make money he would've stayed in Hollywood making movies, he didn't take a penny from Katy Perry when they divorced despite him being entitled to millions.
Lol at taking my post seriously, you truly are one of a kind.
really. Brand doesn't do his videos etc for the money?? bit early in the day for smoking the funny stuff.
Not sure if i've been reading too many posts from 'the other side' but this seems.... bizzare? Why are the government writing to social media companies (they also sent one to tiktok apparently) before he's even been convicted of any crime? And what does his unrelated content (other than the reply video) have to do with these allegations?
It's interesting that Roar87 has a direct line in to the brains of the people he defends.
He 100% knows that neither Elon Musk, nor Russell Brand do things for profit.
What should be done if no charges are brought or if he is found not guilty? Who repays the revenue he would have earned if he had not been demonetised?Struggling to see the relevance TBH. Brand’s newfound fame could easily be turned into financial gain.
he was already famous. this isn't newfound fame.Brand’s newfound fame could easily be turned into financial gain.
What should be done if no charges are brought or if he is found not guilty? Who repays the revenue he would have earned if he had not been demonetised?
he was already famous. this isn't newfound fame.
Why would I do that? That's just avoiding an answer. I don't listen to the guy and am not calling for him to be demonetised.You could always bung him a few quid.
do you not have a proper answer to give?You could always bung him a few quid.
I've no idea who you are lmao, why are you making skinny arm jokes? Are you trying to impress the other nerds?
Why would I do that? That's just avoiding an answer. I don't listen to the guy and am not calling for him to be demonetised.
You seem to be calling for it, or at least agreeing with it. So what should be done if no charges are brought or if he is found not guilty? Who repays the revenue he would have earned if he had not been demonetised?