Russell Brand.

Looking back, I'm considering that Rumble is rattled because they don't have prepared answers and have knee jerked a poor response.

They mentioned "demanding a ban" which wasn't a thing and the committee has no power to say that. The limit of what they can do is demand information and slap a folder of their findings on the parliament floor and demand that the government look at it.
Goes to show how unprofessional Rumble is and one can only wonder what they've got hidden there under the rug of unmentionables.
 
So has the potential to profit massively?

Russell Brand doesn't run his Youtube channel for "profit". If he wanted to make money he would've stayed in Hollywood making movies, he didn't take a penny from Katy Perry when they divorced despite him being entitled to millions.

I’m just amazed roar sticks up so passionately for someone who is a lifetime member of the small arm gang.

Russell Brand is a purple belt in BJJ, what do you do?
 
Last edited:
Russell Brand doesn't run his Youtube channel for "profit". If he wanted to make money he would've stayed in Hollywood making movies, he didn't take a penny from Katy Perry when they divorced despite him being entitled to millions.
really. Brand doesn't do his videos etc for the money?? bit early in the day for smoking the funny stuff.
 
Russell Brand doesn't run his Youtube channel for "profit". If he wanted to make money he would've stayed in Hollywood making movies, he didn't take a penny from Katy Perry when they divorced despite him being entitled to millions.



Russell Brand is a purple belt in BJJ, what do you do?

Lol at taking my post seriously, you truly are one of a kind.
 
Russell Brand doesn't run his Youtube channel for "profit". If he wanted to make money he would've stayed in Hollywood making movies, he didn't take a penny from Katy Perry when they divorced despite him being entitled to millions.

Struggling to see the relevance TBH. Brand’s newfound fame could easily be turned into financial gain.
 
Not sure if i've been reading too many posts from 'the other side' but this seems.... bizzare? Why are the government writing to social media companies (they also sent one to tiktok apparently) before he's even been convicted of any crime? And what does his unrelated content (other than the reply video) have to do with these allegations?


This is entirely unacceptable and anyone that thinks this is in any way acceptable is an absolute idiot.

This is testing the water.

If you allow this for the likes of Russell make no mistake they will start widening the pool of people the goverment start asking p4ivate cinpanies to demonetise.
 
Struggling to see the relevance TBH. Brand’s newfound fame could easily be turned into financial gain.
What should be done if no charges are brought or if he is found not guilty? Who repays the revenue he would have earned if he had not been demonetised?
 
You could always bung him a few quid.
Why would I do that? That's just avoiding an answer. I don't listen to the guy and am not calling for him to be demonetised.

You seem to be calling for it, or at least agreeing with it. So what should be done if no charges are brought or if he is found not guilty? Who repays the revenue he would have earned if he had not been demonetised?
 
Last edited:
Why would I do that? That's just avoiding an answer. I don't listen to the guy and am not calling for him to be demonetised.

You seem to be calling for it, or at least agreeing with it. So what should be done if no charges are brought or if he is found not guilty? Who repays the revenue he would have earned if he had not been demonetised?

I’d make you pay Brand money. What a silly argument, complete nonsense argument.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom