Man of Honour
- Joined
- 21 Nov 2004
- Posts
- 47,958
The text message exchange between the woman who claims he raped her and his response is quite telling imo, of course it needs to be verified as genuine.
In a court of law, not the media.
The text message exchange between the woman who claims he raped her and his response is quite telling imo, of course it needs to be verified as genuine.
Think it's pretty clear by now that such principles are dying if not already dead.In a court of law, not the media.
The text message exchange between the woman who claims he raped her and his response is quite telling imo, of course it needs to be verified as genuine.
Westminster has been gossip central since our glorious Norman cringelord sat his arse there.I don't know why governments seem to stupidly give credibility to conspiracy theories.
If a man is saying he's being tracked by the establishment then we think he's got issues.
But then an elected government writes officially to the mans employers investigating his financial arrangements in a total overreach.
Either the conspiracy is true, or we've got reddit level gossip mongers as government officials now.
I don't know why governments seem to stupidly give credibility to conspiracy theories.
If a man is saying he's being tracked by the establishment then we think he's got issues.
But then an elected government writes officially to the mans employers investigating his financial arrangements in a total overreach.
Either the conspiracy is true, or we've got reddit level gossip mongers as government officials now.
Nearly half of the Brand story now is about big brother government.Who did this happen to? Definitely a topic worth its own thread if true.
Whose to say it isn't?They were all in that it was a government conspiracy to silence him before that stupid letter, to be fair
Whose to say it isn't?
Yeah, I mean you've only got one of the architects of the osb writing directly to social media companies about people that haven't even been charged with anything let alone found guilty in a court of law, ironically the same people that don't seem to care about mp's who've been accused of the same thing. Strange how their concern seems to 'target' a certain sort of individual doesn't it.Common sense and reason? Although both are generally ignored today.
Yeah, I mean you've only got one of the architects of the osb writing directly to social media companies about people that haven't even been charged with anything let alone found guilty in a court of law, ironically the same people that don't seem to care about mp's who've been accused of the same thing. Strange how their concern seems to 'target' a certain sort of individual doesn't it.
To much is coming out about him now and its not just one person. Dispatches alone has four woman willing to testify.Even with the rape centre evidence and texts there is no chance he gets convicted. There is just too much reasonable doubt. Maybe a civil case could get a liability claim given the lower threshold.
Oh and did anyone catch what sir Billy Connolly said about him? He once caught him constantly asking an aid to show him her ****, kept at her until Billy told him to leave her alone, that one thing alone shows him for what he is.
Unnamed source told The Sun, people take it as fact, it's astounding to me that people just take everything as fact. The only direct quotes are Russell Brand saying Billy Connolly is a hero, so I guess he didn't tell him off too badly
How long have D-notices existed?It's a very dangerous precedent the media and the government are setting up.
This....It's a very dangerous precedent the media and the government are setting up.