Russell Brand.

Not from any of the incidents from the programme/article. Some woman has come forward from 2003 though..
Yeah fair enough - I see that. It's interesting that none of the incidents from the original story have yet to come forward, particularly this one:

From the BBC:

One woman alleges that Brand raped her without a condom against a wall in his Los Angeles home. She says Brand tried to stop her leaving until she told him she was going to the bathroom. She was treated at a rape crisis centre on the same day, which the Times says it has confirmed via medical records.

Why on earth is this not a police matter. Of all the accusations against him this would seem to be the most compelling.

The accusation that is actually at the police's door could be genuine - unfortunately, with the media coverage of this now, there is a chance it could not.
 
Yeah fair enough - I see that. It's interesting that none of the incidents from the original story have yet to come forward, particularly this one:

From the BBC:

One woman alleges that Brand raped her without a condom against a wall in his Los Angeles home. She says Brand tried to stop her leaving until she told him she was going to the bathroom. She was treated at a rape crisis centre on the same day, which the Times says it has confirmed via medical records.

Why on earth is this not a police matter. Of all the accusations against him this would seem to be the most compelling.

The accusation that is actually at the police's door could be genuine - unfortunately, with the media coverage of this now, there is a chance it could not.
The incident took place in America didn't it? I believe that also the one with some text messages involved that some people think are a bit suss
 
The incident took place in America didn't it? I believe that also the one with some text messages involved that some people think are a bit suss
Doesn't matter where it happened. American police are perfectly capable of investigating it. So far this whole thing is a complete farce.
 
You realise in context he was 7 years and probably the same size as the dog, people mentioning this are scraping the bottom barrel.

That may well be true. You can't think that behaviour is in any way normal though. Its not remotely like a kid pouring boiling water on an ants nest or shooting a bird with an air rifle. I guess you're now ignoring your claim he only did it once, did you not read the section you linked? To me that reads like it happened quite a few times.

I'm not saying he's a murdering psychopath, I'm saying with what allegedly happened to him as a kid and his behaviour as an adult he isn't what you would call a well rounded human being. Though that is not illegal but addicts don't have the boundaries that non addicts have.
 
That may well be true. You can't think that behaviour is in any way normal though. Its not remotely like a kid pouring boiling water on an ants nest or shooting a bird with an air rifle. I guess you're now ignoring your claim he only did it once, did you not read the section you linked? To me that reads like it happened quite a few times.

I'm not saying he's a murdering psychopath, I'm saying with what allegedly happened to him as a kid and his behaviour as an adult he isn't what you would call a well rounded human being. Though that is not illegal but addicts don't have the boundaries that non addicts have.

If only there was an organisation that could look into these things and determine whether there was any criminal behavior involved......
 
He was a Lib Dem for nearly all of his career :rolleyes:

He was Labour for 10 years but yeah, them too. Although I'm pretty sure RB doesnt have the high level protection that Smith appeared to have had. Making the original comparison idiotic.

The RSPCA?

Yeah, sure, personally I was going to go with the Police leading on this one, but I'm happy for the RSPCA pitch in as well.
 
5m0J7eo.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom