• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Ryzen "2" ?

LOLN1 said:
Another reflection:
With windows 10, when I apply "maximum performance" in savings windows ,it does not work
The CPU oscillates 2200,hz +/- but does not perform maximum frequency
Con windows7 works ,the frequency ranges between 4100 and 4350mhz
Click to expand...

That can only be because AMD has not released a Chipset driver yet for the 2700x. Win10 has always needed an AMD cipset driver. Win7 never did need a dedicated chipset driver, AMD or Intel.
 
Zeed said:
What Rock You been living under for last week. Numbers are all over 2700x 2700 2600. as expected 8-10% gain from previous ryzen and better IMC.
Click to expand...

I am being super hopeful for the resolving of the cold boot memory problems. That alone would get me to upgrade.

To note... there is just no way I am buying a new board though. If the issues are board related, then I'm just gonna stick it out lol.
 
Mercutio said:
This keeps appearing in the thread (do a search). It's generally considered long solved. Check your bios/memory/other stuff.
Click to expand...

I already have the latest beta BIOS from MSI for my Tomahawk. It wasn't long solved for this board at all. It had issues (even with zero O/C) with getting and staying at 3200Mhz memory right up until this latest beta from a few weeks back.
 
Zeed said:
What Rock You been living under for last week. Numbers are all over 2700x 2700 2600. as expected 8-10% gain from previous ryzen and better IMC.
Click to expand...

I still haven't seen any side by side comparisons of Gen1 vs Gen2 in both overclocked or standard formats. Overclocking would need to be done at equal clocks and then a "max" clock but the standard non clocked is overlooked even though it is a good benchmark in itself.
 
Steveocee said:
I still haven't seen any side by side comparisons of Gen1 vs Gen2 in both overclocked or standard formats. Overclocking would need to be done at equal clocks and then a "max" clock but the standard non clocked is overlooked even though it is a good benchmark in itself.
Click to expand...
ZERO gain clock for clock (Or in margin error). That enough for You ?? They just clock 300-400mhz higher and can handle faster ram thats it.

was few pages back 4ghz on 1800x vs 4ghz on 2700. 1usmus is testing hes 2700x said not impressed either

Its a die shrink what do people expect ??
 
Zeed said:
ZERO gain clock for clock (Or in margin error). That enough for You ?? They just clock 300-400mhz higher and can handle faster ram thats it.

was few pages back 4ghz on 1800x vs 4ghz on 2700. 1usmus is testing hes 2700x said not impressed either

Its a die shrink what do people expect ??
Click to expand...

quoting for posterity :D

Edit: I'm not expecting much but with the better balanced core boosting/etc involved, it's not going to _quite_ as straight as that.
 
Zeed said:
ZERO gain clock for clock (Or in margin error). That enough for You ?? They just clock 300-400mhz higher and can handle faster ram thats it.

was few pages back 4ghz on 1800x vs 4ghz on 2700. 1usmus is testing hes 2700x said not impressed either

Its a die shrink what do people expect ??
Click to expand...

Calm down Dear, it's only a Processor. :p

I expect a reason to upgrade from my 5930k so hopefully user reviews next week will show performance and RAM is OK. I also want some new features from the new motherboard like dual M.2 and onboard WiFi. For that reason, the new 400 series motherboards will interest me, too.

Oh, and security too?

Not long to wait. :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom