• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Ryzen "2" ?

I'd just do the logical thing and ignore the results.

To be honest, I'm pessimistic about Aprils release. If it's just higher clocking Ryzen then it's just as bad as Kabylake was for me in terms of excitement.
 
gavinh87 said:
Could be 3600 mhz?
Click to expand...

Still doesn't explain why that then does not also transfer to single threaded performance, if you're getting a large boost in performance from very fast ram, much faster than Ryzen can supposedly run, but also lose performance at the same time is all just very much too far fetched. far too much stretching of reality going on to make it fit.

Either its right and Boost is not working / is disabled or i'm with Martini, this should be ignored.
 
Still think its going to be 10% to 15% all in all improvement over last years chips, 15% even with a new boost setup is really good and could put the 8700k in a bit of a difficult position especially if there are a couple of hundred more mhz in the overclock.
Daft numbers like 20%+ aint going to happen, if they do then Intel has a big problem.
 
You can't really compare a single R5 1600 result to a single R5 2600 result, unless they were done by the same person with an overwise similar/same setup. That's why I quoted the (supposedly) average figure before. We won't know for sure until a reviewer has both in their possession.
 
Coming to the benchmark scores, the Ryzen 5 2600 scored 4269 points in the single-core test and 20102 points in the multi-core test. That’s around a 14.5% increase in single-thread 31.5% increase in multi-thread performance over the Ryzen 5 1600 in the same benchmark.

But, these scores are not to be considered final as AMD can still cram in a few improvements and the faster IMC can do even better for these scores.

https://wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-5-2600-pinnacle-ridge-cpu-performance-leak/
 
4K8KW10 said:
Coming to the benchmark scores, the Ryzen 5 2600 scored 4269 points in the single-core test and 20102 points in the multi-core test. That’s around a 14.5% increase in single-thread 31.5% increase in multi-thread performance over the Ryzen 5 1600 in the same benchmark.

But, these scores are not to be considered final as AMD can still cram in a few improvements and the faster IMC can do even better for these scores.

https://wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-5-2600-pinnacle-ridge-cpu-performance-leak/
Click to expand...

That multi-threaded score is very interesting, possibly significant optimizations happening, if true...
 
4K8KW10 said:
Coming to the benchmark scores, the Ryzen 5 2600 scored 4269 points in the single-core test and 20102 points in the multi-core test. That’s around a 14.5% increase in single-thread 31.5% increase in multi-thread performance over the Ryzen 5 1600 in the same benchmark.

But, these scores are not to be considered final as AMD can still cram in a few improvements and the faster IMC can do even better for these scores.

https://wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-5-2600-pinnacle-ridge-cpu-performance-leak/
Click to expand...

The day anyone takes wccftech seriously is a day that Ryzen 2 will overclock to 5.4 on a £50 mobo.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom