-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Ryzen "2" ?
- Thread starter beany_bot
- Start date
)
Intel must open its factories and allow AMD to make their CPU there, too. How did AMD give Intel their Vega IP?
Well, here, in the following test, the performance uplift is very high:
Caporegime
Videocardz have put the leaked results up in an article:
https://videocardz.com/75185/first-benchmarks-of-ryzen-7-2000-cpu-have-been-leaked
The most interesting thing for me about the leaks,is the decent decrease in cache and memory latency.
https://videocardz.com/75185/first-benchmarks-of-ryzen-7-2000-cpu-have-been-leaked
The most interesting thing for me about the leaks,is the decent decrease in cache and memory latency.
Soldato
Higher boost clock and IPC improvements, hardly beyond the realm of possibility...
I know - and the 12% Higher single thread and only 8% higher multi-thread. That points to a higher limited core boost. The leak is that this is a 2700 not the flagship either so we should be looking at number higher that that. It is still a ways south of the 8700k single core, but it closes the gap a fair way. I guess we will see soon enough.
Soldato
I reckon this is where we'll end up:
Flagship still a bit south of Intel's single thread (but much closer). Whipping it mercilessly in multi-thread/pretty much everything else. 2 more cores, 4 more threads, similar price.
Flagship still a bit south of Intel's single thread (but much closer). Whipping it mercilessly in multi-thread/pretty much everything else. 2 more cores, 4 more threads, similar price.
Soldato
And people will still say it's no good for gaming
LOL - it is still likely to be 10-15% behind the 8700k on pure single core performance - and I would guess it will stay 10% behind unless something is actually using the 7th&8th core.And people will still say it's no good for gaming
It is going to blow the 8700k away when it comes to multicore though.
It would be very interesting to see what a 2400G scores with 16-16-16-36 timings (as in the leak). My understanding is it has the same IMC improvements and should score similarly, so matching scores would help boost the credibility of the leak.
It makes sense though: AMD knew they'd get something from the process improvement and then picked the 1 thing they knew could have significant impact (IMC) and improved it. This was especially important for the APUs which use system memory for the GPU side so it's a very good use of engineering resources by them.
Soldato
There's genuinely not _that_ much stuff that's purely single core.
Precision boost 2 alone will make things work nicer. As it was, heavy single threaded stuff + smaller workloads on other cores meant a general reduction in core speed - so, the heavy single threaded part of the workload would suck. The newer version is able to balance things much better so "single threaded" performance will be better than just IPC and Ghz indicate. We'll have to wait and see on games benchmarks, all up in the air till then but I think 10-15% behind is a bit pessimistic.
10 days till solid news.
Grrr... I hate waiting. BTW your Sig is epic.
Some people are playing with the new CPUs right now. Great to see they are leaking some fresh information.
Is it possible to expect even better results with the final silicon?
some of the leaks are actual performance . the new chips will obviously be great for gaming just not on par with a 8700k . people who say single core performance doesnt matter in gaming it does a very big deal.thats why intel dominate literally every top game in benchmarks.its nice to see amd bringing good cpus.if they really want to take a big part of the market get that single performance up ! they can do the multi get the single up and people will jump intels ship as fast as they can make em. most people prefer amd as a company. its just the performance of why people choose intel.
A leak of AMD's presentation slides are out: https://videocardz.com/75194/amd-ryzen-2000-series-exposed-pricing-performance-leaked
Associate
- Joined
- 31 Aug 2017
- Posts
- 2,209
10% less single core speed than the 8700 but humiliating it everywhere else is a win if true - i would much rather have a slightly less fast single core chip than one that gets its ass handed to it in many other tasks, especially as zen is likely to still be more affordable and use less power and dump less heat... remember all those things amd gets blamed for in the past.
Associate
- Joined
- 31 Aug 2017
- Posts
- 2,209
Yeah there is still time for them to mess this up, even if those numbers are accurate AMD are capable of messing up the launch - they have history 
No 2800 (at the moment), i wonder if it will be released in a month or two. Maybe waiting for the process to settle a little more to drop a 4.5ghz chip out just to kick intel in the dangly bits.
No 2800 (at the moment), i wonder if it will be released in a month or two. Maybe waiting for the process to settle a little more to drop a 4.5ghz chip out just to kick intel in the dangly bits.