Underboss
- Joined
- 20 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 33,729
- Location
- Oxfordshire / Bucks
Who cares about the 7900X3D, its why its still in stock
I'd be interested to know how many 7950X3D's OCUK had.
Is it really worth another £150 ?
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Who cares about the 7900X3D, its why its still in stock
I'd be interested to know how many 7950X3D's OCUK had.
So what's the release date for the cheaper ones?
This is the wrong place to ask these questions. Even if it is worth paying extra to someone, other people won't see the benefit.Is it really worth another £150 ?
Is it really worth another £150 ?
No, he meant 7900x3d, not 7800x3dI watched the Gamers Nexus review on it and he basically said when companies only send out one sample its abit sus. Either the 7800x3d is too good and will take away sales from the higher tier chips or its absolutely pants and abit of an embarrassment . Have to wait and see
Seen it as cheap as under £300. Was really tempted, but figured I'd rather just do a full upgrade.The 5800x3d is looking a very good buy right now. From trying to find places that have the 7950x3d i've seen it down to £330 inc
I watched the Gamers Nexus review on it and he basically said when companies only send out one sample its abit sus. Either the 7800x3d is too good and will take away sales from the higher tier chips or its absolutely pants and abit of an embarrassment . Have to wait and see
Just a reminder that a leaker said that the 7950X3D would be 20-30% ahead of a 13900KS and another said a 7950X3D would be a generation ahead.
HUB did the 7800X3D simulated by turning off the CCD with no cache, its a little better....
They didn't drop the clocks to match the clocks on the 7800X3D (5ghz max boost) so their tests were invalid.HUB did the 7800X3D simulated by turning off the CCD with no cache, its a little better....
They didn't drop the clocks to match the clocks on the 7800X3D (5ghz max boost) so their tests were invalid.
7950x3d vcache ccd max boost is similar to 7800x3d. The reason you see 5.7ghz in specs is because non vcache ccd can clock that highThey didn't drop the clocks to match the clocks on the 7800X3D (5ghz max boost) so their tests were invalid.
Freq max is 5.25ghz on the v cache CCD on the 7950X - multiple outlets have reported this. Whilst the 7800X3D according to AMD's own page has a max of 5.0ghz.What do you have to say the cached chiplet on the 7950X3D isn't the same as the cached chiplet on the 7800X3D
The difference isn't 9%. That's what I'm saying. And in the worst spots the 7600X chokes hard and you go even below 60 fps. THAT'S the issue, and why you can't just look at reviews and take them at face value. You need experience with the game & scenes. (See @Dave2150 's results in the post linked below the article link)Yeah but if the 7600x say isnt good enough for you in games +9% for +£500 isnt going to make a difference. Its not like say 110 fps is unplayable and 120 fps will make the extra £500 worth it.
The 4090 is different. Yes its expensive but it gives you massive gains in return. This dosnt, in strictly gaming only terms.
Cyberpunk in particular isn't a GPU centric title, it's an everything centric title, because it can use more of whatever you have to feed it and spit out more fps, better image quality, faster loading, more & better AI (esp. with mods) etc.This is weird as hell. Cyberpunk is a GPU centric title. And there's next to no difference between any of the AM5 cpus in gaming loads, the 7600x is within a few fps of the 7950x in any title. And unless these new 3D chips are going to take GPU workload onto their cores, it's not going to matter.
What did you do, pick an arbitrary title and fps level to hold against it? Paying 500 bucks for 5 frames is so dumb it almost transitions into immoral wastefulness
Hallelujah. Reviews aren't entirely representative of actual gameplay.The difference isn't 9%. That's what I'm saying. And in the worst spots the 7600X chokes hard and you go even below 60 fps. THAT'S the issue, and why you can't just look at reviews and take them at face value. You need experience with the game & scenes. (See @Dave2150 's results in the post linked below the article link)
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D Review - Best of Both Worlds
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the spearhead of the AMD Zen 4 X3D lineup. In our performance review we test AMD's new 16-core flagship with dozens of applications and 14 games at up to 4K, to see whether AMD can take the performance crown from Intel, how power consumption is affected, and what can be...www.techpowerup.comRyzen 7950X3D, 7900X3D, 7800X3D
You do me a favor? Can you test Cyberpunk 2077 in the tom's dinner area? It's the heaviest area in the game, I wanna see how zen 4 holds up. I know the 3d crumbles. If you want directions how to get there, just ask My R5 7600 is close to 100% all around this area, poor thing! Tried the same...forums.overclockers.co.uk
Cyberpunk in particular isn't a GPU centric title, it's an everything centric title, because it can use more of whatever you have to feed it and spit out more fps, better image quality, faster loading, more & better AI (esp. with mods) etc.
The 7600X isn't within a few fps of the 7950X3D, in fact in games that most demand more CPU power it's very far from it (see above, but there's plenty of other examples like Forspoken, Hogwarts, Factorio, Borderlands 3, Far Cry 6, Age of Empires 4 etc. the list is huge).
Btw I don't understand this focus on the cost of the 7950X3D, if you only care about the gaming performance then obviously wait for the 7800X3D. You get a 16 core beast because you need/want that many cores, not because it's the best bang for your buck.