I wasn't comparing the 1600 with Intel. 50 - 55fps was actually a great result. My point was, it was far far far lower than what the review showed that I should be getting, cause they tested in a way less cpu bound locationVery true, i have to tho... in same vain, i had a Ryzen 1600, a 4690K before that.
The first image is with that 4690K, the second with the Ryzen 1600. It also depends on the game, i mean notice the 100% load on the 46900K and the 33 FPS.... unplayable, 85 with the 1600 and its not over stressed.