• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Poll: Ryzen 7950X3D, 7900X3D, 7800X3D

Will you be purchasing the 7800X3D on the 6th?


  • Total voters
    191
  • Poll closed .
Thing is I take your comment and look at middle intel boards at £500 and highend at £750-£1100 and wonder why those boards are so ridiculous priced as well. In fact at the higher end, in general with like for like spec, I am seeing AM5 boards cheaper than their Intel boards.

If you look at the motherboards most normal people actually buy,the AM5 motherboards with PCI-E 5.0 are ridiculously priced. Very few people I know care about £300+ motherboards,but they do care about stuff between £150~£250.

It gets even worse when you look at the fact A620 is starting at £120,which is twice that of the A520 with no overclocking and last generation connectivity. B550 motherboards started at £100 onwards. It can't be even the cost of DDR5 implementations,because Intel has the same considerations and their motherboards need better VRMs unlike AMD. It can't be even the change to an LGA socket either.


A couple of points worth noting. First, AMD don’t make or sell motherboards that I know of and component costs have massively increased over the last 12 months.

The lower demand for retail parts after the covid driven boom and unprecedented slump in Intel based product sales probably isn’t helping motherboard prices either.

It affects Intel more as their motherboards need better VRMs in the first place due to higher power draw. The reality is AMD split B650 into PCI-E 4.0 B650 and PCI-E 5.0 B650E. B550 wasn't split the same way.

AM5 boards absolutely are more expensive, and i don't know why, its something i might look in to.

What ever it is this is a choice by board vendors.

There was a time when equivalent AM3 and 300 series AM4 boards were cheaper than Intel, but they were also of a lower quality.

Intel B660 Gaming X AX: £190

AMD B650 Gaming X AX: £240

It is.You already saw the last generation,the RX6600/RX6600XT/RTX3050 at upto £350 had PCI-E 8X connections. Nvidia and AMD are slowly pushing up lower end dGPUs to higher price points. The RTX4060 uses the same class of dGPU that was in the RTX3050,etc and only has 8GB of VRAM.

That means as time progresses the RTX5060/RX8600XT will only have PCI-E 8X connections,and limited VRAM. That means more issues,because they will cache into system RAM. Many here have no clue about this because they only buy expensive motherboards and expensive graphics cards,and upgrade quickly.

I had a quick look at some retailers and decided to just look at ASRock as an example.

These 2 B760 motherboards are £160~£170 from loads of retailers:

This Z790 motherboard is £200:

DDR5 and PCI-E 5.0 main graphics slot. Two have WIFI.

Now look at the B650 equivalents from the same company:

The first one costs more than the B760 motherboards and the second costs more than the Z790 equivalent. None of them have PCI-E 5.0 graphics card slots.


Over £250. That is just looking at one company. If you look at lot of manufacturers,there are plenty of DDR4/DDR5 motherboards with PCI-E 5.0 graphics card slots under £200 on the Intel side!

It's even worse with mini-ITX motherboards,as I use SFF systems,and so do quite a few of my friends. t

The cheapest AM5 mini-ITX motherboard is £250(MSI):

Totally PCI-E 4.0 for everything. The cheapest motherboard with PCI-E 5.0 graphics slot is £315(ASUS):

Plus,the need for overbuilt VRMs is less needed for a SFF PC,because you would rather run the CPU in its efficiency sweetspot anyway.

The cheapest B760 DDR5 mini-ITX with a PCI-E 5.0 slot is £230(ASUS):

£85 difference for both Asus ROG Strix motherboards based on midrange chipsets? There is also an ASRock Z790 mini-ITX motherboard for around the same price.

The cheapest DDR4 one is £190,and it has PCI-E 5.0(MSI):

Both are MSI Edge motherboards and the AMD ones removes all PCI-E 5.0! The Intel motherboards need beefier VRMs too.

Probably not, haven't looked. You were 5alking about cheap motherboards though, there are B760M boards for around £130 on the Intel 1700 side but nothing at that level on the AMD AM5 side. Don't they usually release something like a A6xx chipset for AMD board that deal with the cheap end?
Not seeing anyone make those boards at the minute (although I've not looked hard). Although probably not relevant to this conversation as pairing a board like that with a 7950X3D does seem like a bit of a mismatch.

Exactly,as many here don't appear to shop around at different retailers and just go for £300+ motherboards.

It makes the Ryzen 5 7600X and Ryzen 7 7700X look expensive in comparison,ie,the motherboard costs as much or more than the CPU.

People were repeatedly attacking Intel years ago,for doing this. Now the table has turned it's suddenly not the fault of AMD,splitting the B650 into literally a PCI-E 4.0 B650 and a PCI-E 5.0 B650E?! The amount of flip-flopping is amusing.

Remember people defended Zen3 price increases(and I said wait and see how much Zen4 will cost) and then people defended Zen4 pricing at launch. AMD quickly dropped prices,and introduced the non-X and X3D parts very quickly for a reason,ie,sales are not great.

What's even worse is I don't even think the Intel motherboards are that well priced either,but seriously spending £200 on a motherboard to get no PCI-E 5.0 at all??

That was X570 motherboard pricing,where you the latest PCI-E version. Now you get basically low tier stuff with old generation speeds.

I don't see why AM5 boards should be more expensive, look for yourselves, they are almost right across the range.....

AMD needs to be knocking heads together.

Well for me and my mates,we decided to skip Zen4 currently and wait for Zen5. The motherboard prices and feature separation are one of the main reasons,and the whole B650/B650E has put me off,especially as there is zero reason to have this as the chipset is the same Promontory 21. The pair of Promontory 21 chips cost less than the repurposed I/O die used in X570 motherboards. Yet,you could get X570 motherboards for £200. I hope the B750 motherboards are all PCI-E 5.0!

They must realise there are 1000's of us waiting to upgrade once the prices drop a bit, just get on with it already, i want new shinies.

They are probably thinking like Nvidia - less sales but at much bigger margins will even it all out. I think some of these companies need a few more reduced sales. It's not sunk into their heads,that the pandemic and mining booms during 2020/2021/2022 were a one off event,not something that they can continue every year for the next five years.
 
Last edited:
If you look at the motherboards most normal people actually buy,the AM5 motherboards with PCI-E 5.0 are ridiculously priced. Very few people I know care about £300+ motherboards,but they do care about stuff between £150~£250.

It gets even worse when you look at the fact A620 is starting at £120,which is twice that of the A520 with no overclocking and last generation connectivity. B550 motherboards started at £100 onwards. It can't be even the cost of DDR5 implementations,because Intel has the same considerations and their motherboards need better VRMs unlike AMD. It can't be even the change to an LGA socket either.




It affects Intel more as their motherboards need better VRMs in the first place due to higher power draw. The reality is AMD split B650 into PCI-E 4.0 B650 and PCI-E 5.0 B650E. B550 wasn't split the same way.



It is.You already saw the last generation,the RX6600/RX6600XT/RTX3050 at upto £350 had PCI-E 8X connections. Nvidia and AMD are slowly pushing up lower end dGPUs to higher price points. The RTX4060 uses the same class of dGPU that was in the RTX3050,etc and only has 8GB of VRAM.

That means as time progresses the RTX5060/RX8600XT will only have PCI-E 8X connections,and limited VRAM. That means more issues,because they will cache into system RAM. Many here have no clue about this because they only buy expensive motherboards and expensive graphics cards,and upgrade quickly.

I had a quick look at some retailers and decided to just look at ASRock as an example.



The first one costs more than the B760 motherboards and the second costs more than the Z790 equivalent. None of them have PCI-E 5.0 graphics card slots.



Over £250. That is just looking at one company. If you look at lot of manufacturers,there are plenty of DDR4/DDR5 motherboards with PCI-E 5.0 graphics card slots under £200 on the Intel side!

It's even worse with mini-ITX motherboards,as I use SFF systems,and so do quite a few of my friends. t



Plus,the need for overbuilt VRMs is less needed for a SFF PC,because you would rather run the CPU in its efficiency sweetspot anyway.



£85 difference for both Asus ROG Strix motherboards based on midrange chipsets? There is also an ASRock Z790 mini-ITX motherboard for around the same price.



Both are MSI Edge motherboards and the AMD ones removes all PCI-E 5.0! The Intel motherboards need beefier VRMs too.



Exactly,as many here don't appear to shop around at different retailers and just go for £300+ motherboards.

It makes the Ryzen 5 7600X and Ryzen 7 7700X look expensive in comparison,ie,the motherboard costs as much or more than the CPU.

These same people were repeatedly attacking Intel years ago,for doing this. Now the table has turned it's suddenly not the fault of AMD,splitting the B650 into literally a PCI-E 4.0 B650 and a PCI-E 5.0 B650E.

Remember people defending Zen3 price increases(and I said wait and see how much Zen4 will cost) and then people defending Zen4 pricing at launch. AMD quickly dropped prices,and introduced the non-X and X3D parts very quickly for a reason,ie,sales are not great.

What's even worse is I don't even think the Intel motherboards are that well priced either,but seriously spending £200 on a motherboard to get no PCI-E 5.0 at all??

That was X570 motherboard pricing,where you the latest PCI-E version. Now you get basically low tier stuff with old generation speeds.

AMD is allowing PCIE4 and PCIE5, so what. Intel is allowing DDR4 and DDR5 as well as PCIE4 and PCIE5.

Did the same motherboard makers forget to put a premium on new gen features for their Intel boards?
 

AMD is allowing PCIE4 and PCIE5, so what. Intel is allowing DDR4 and DDR5 as well as PCIE4 and PCIE5.

Did the same motherboard makers forget to put a premium on new gen features for their Intel boards?

You clearly haven't read anything I said,so read it again or don't bother if you can't be arsed. Humbug understood it very well - that is telling when Humbug who tends to defend AMD can see it and you can't.

I don't see why AM5 boards should be more expensive, look for yourselves, they are almost right across the range.....

AMD needs to be knocking heads together.
 
Last edited:
You clearly haven't read anything I said,so read it again or don't bother if you can't be arsed. Humbug understood it very well - that is telling when Humbug who tends to defend AMD can see it and you can't.

You have not presented a reason for it besides AMD allowing a compromise tier and I find that greatly lacking.

After all, what's stopping the manufacturer from making the low spec tier cheaper.

Wow ok, instead of replying you're editing two paragraphs into the post 20 minutes after telling me I didn't read it :p

You're 100% right that I didn't read anything you didn't have written at the time.
 
Last edited:
AMD probally got that much stock of AM4 and its still selling well at current price, I bet once that's all gone and if sales are still mediocre for AM5, then they might do something about it.
 
AMD probally got that much stock of AM4 and its still selling well at current price, I bet once that's all gone and if sales are still mediocre for AM5, then they might do something about it.

I don’t think AMD will have any stock of AM4 motherboards. I don’t think AMD even make the chipsets for AM4. I think it’s ASMedia.
 
You clearly haven't read anything I said,so read it again or don't bother if you can't be arsed. Humbug understood it very well - that is telling when Humbug who tends to defend AMD can see it and you can't.

I think there is some big profit making by the manufacturers somewhere. AT least high boards with PCI-e 5 slots and M2 pci-e connectors can justify their costs somewhere as I read in an article that each pci-e m2 connector costs $50 and some high end boards have several on there so I can see why they may well be several hundred pounds more than the lower end boards.

Gigiabyte are off their trolley with their high end boards. You compare them to their mid range board and it might have one or two extra bits on but suddenly its £150 more.

Personally because the current gen socket for Intel is a dead end socket now, I just think they are setting them cheaper because they need to in order to sell them. the new AM5 socket boards are more because people want them with all the nice fast cpu's that AMD have brought out and people will keep them for years.

Prices are falling though, I saw in the states that they are doing Asrock PG Lightning x670E AM5 boards (pic-e 5 gfx slot and 1 MX pcie 5) with a 7700x cpu and 32gb (2 x 16gb) GDDR 5 C32 6000 ram for $500 now with jedi survivor free. Whens Gibbo going to match that for £500 here please? Cheapest i can get to is £768.
 
Last edited:
I don’t think AMD will have any stock of AM4 motherboards. I don’t think AMD even make the chipsets for AM4. I think it’s ASMedia.
Rephrasing it. There's probally that much stock of Zen3 (AMD) CPUs and its still selling well at current price, and plenty of motherboards for AM4 from the various manufacturers, and they appear to be selling reasonably well, most likely down to people seeing the expensive costs associated with the immediate expense of AM5. Are AMD still producing the CPUs? Probally part of their sales strategy - making their previous generation still appealing, once they have milked Zen3 totally dry/all gone and sales are still mediocre for AM5, then AMD might do something about the costs associated with their new platform, then people will end up upgrading quicker again.

Edit: Stinks for the consumer, I'm not really a fan of AMD, Intel or Nvidia, none of them give a crap.
 
Last edited:
Intel seems to feel it'll do well enough to bother with it. As Matt says, AM4 boards are still selling well. Might make it cheaper to transition over if they already have decent DDR4 RAM.
yeah but AM5 cpu's aka Ryzen 7000 series have their memory controller in the I/O die on the CPU which only supports DDR5, so if you drop an AM5 CPU into an AM5 board with DDR4 RAM.... you see where I'm going?
 
It would be interesting to know how much an AM5 board cost to manufacture vs an AM4 at the same level (AM5 Asus Hero vs AM4 Asus Hero). The difference is probably not £350.
 
yeah but AM5 cpu's aka Ryzen 7000 series have their memory controller in the I/O die on the CPU which only supports DDR5, so if you drop an AM5 CPU into an AM5 board with DDR4 RAM.... you see where I'm going?
So if DDR5 support makes the motherboard more expensive and Zen4 forces DDR5, then since AMD make the Zen4 CPUs is it not AMD making them more expensive (at least in the price bracket where people may want to or be happy to use DDR4)?
 
Rephrasing it for you. There's probally that much stock of Zen3 (AMD) CPUs and its still selling well at current price, and plenty of motherboards for AM4 from the various manufacturers, and they appear to be selling reasonably well, most likely down to people seeing the expensive costs associated with the immediate expense of AM5. Are AMD still producing the CPUs? Probally part of their sales strategy - making their previous generation still appealing, once they have milked Zen3 totally dry/all gone and sales are still mediocre for AM5, then AMD might do something about the costs associated with their new platform, then people will end up upgrading quicker again.

Stinks for the consumer, I'm not really a fan of AMD, Intel or Nvidia, none of them give a **** about the average person, skivvying away in **** jobs for peanuts trying to make ends meet, while cost if living has increased like crazy.

I agree the world is at a strange point and some semiconductor sectors are particularly bad.

I would hazard a guess that current prices are in part due to motherboard manufacturers using ronger AMD sales to offset poor Intel figures as mechanism to make up for lost margins. This along with current market conditions (component prices/lower sales) plus maybe a higher unit cost to produce AM5 boards.
 
I think there is some big profit making by the manufacturers somewhere. AT least high boards with PCI-e 5 slots and M2 pci-e connectors can justify their costs somewhere as I read in an article that each pci-e m2 connector costs $50 and some high end boards have several on there so I can see why they may well be several hundred pounds more than the lower end boards.

Gigiabyte are off their trolley with their high end boards. You compare them to their mid range board and it might have one or two extra bits on but suddenly its £150 more.

Personally because the current gen socket for Intel is a dead end socket now, I just think they are setting them cheaper because they need to in order to sell them. the new AM5 socket boards are more because people want them with all the nice fast cpu's that AMD have brought out and people will keep them for years.

Prices are falling though, I saw in the states that they are doing Asrock PG Lightning x670E AM5 boards (pic-e 5 gfx slot and 1 MX pcie 5) with a 7700x cpu and 32gb (2 x 16gb) GDDR 5 C32 6000 ram for $500 now with jedi survivor free. Whens Gibbo going to match that for £500 here please? Cheapest i can get to is £768.

The problem is that a few sub £200 B660/Z690 also supported it so it seems someone is taking the mickey on AM5 and PCI-E 5.0 graphics slots. If you look at the B760 prices they are far more in line with B550 prices,whereas the B650/B650E have just massively gone up in price. Even in the case of the mini-ITX motherboards I am looking at,it's no point if AM5 lasts longer and that is from someone who stays on sockets for 5~7 years and is using the same higher end AM4 mini-ITX motherboard from 2018. For example at nearly £100 more between the B760 and B650E mini-ITX motherboards(the Asus ones),that is a whole chunk of a new motherboard there. So in a few years if I were to get a new CPU,then when you add up the nearly £100 you save there,plus the money you can get back from selling the old motherboard,and it's most of the cost of the new motherboard there.AM4 was great because motherboard prices were more competitive.

WRT to the bundles,the US always gets them - just look at the deals from Microcenter!!
 
Last edited:
If you look at the motherboards most normal people actually buy,the AM5 motherboards with PCI-E 5.0 are ridiculously priced. Very few people I know care about £300+ motherboards,but they do care about stuff between £150~£250.
Personally I went for a X670-E @£315, which is about £90 more than I paid for a good quality X570 AM4

Is it over priced, yeah personally I feel it is £250 is where it should be imho and I rationalise getting it (rightly or wrongly) cos:
- You get more features, it is a better solution vs AM4
- Yes it probably is more expensive to make
- add a bit for inflationary pressures
- X670 will hopefully last at least 2 further CPU generations
- mostly though whilst I could drop in a good value 5800x3D into AM4 that is sunk money on a EoL platform you'd then have to wait up to 4yrs for that to pay off
- there isn't a lot of choice in the matter
- £90 is a trivial sum compared to the GPU component prices
 
Back
Top Bottom